Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong HKU/HP/Silver"

 
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{:Team:Hong_Kong_HKU/Templates/NavBar}}
 
{{:Team:Hong_Kong_HKU/Templates/NavBar}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 
<head>
 
<head>
 
<style>
 
<style>
 +
 +
.body {
 +
    margin-top: 200px;
 +
}
 +
 
.button {
 
.button {
 
     background-color: #4CAF50;
 
     background-color: #4CAF50;
Line 18: Line 31:
 
</head>
 
</head>
 
<body>
 
<body>
 +
<p style="margin-top:200px">Having done the experiments to put our diagnostic tool to the test, we needed to know what our end-users and the general public thought about our design. Through the activities conducted in the Human practices we tried to answer the aforementioned question. Our Human practice is divided into 3 sections
 +
<ul></p>
 +
  <li>Public Engagement </li>
 +
  <li>Collaboration </li>
 +
  <li>Integration</li>
 +
  <li>Safety</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
 +
<p>In order to widen our reach we made a <a href="https://www.facebook.com/igemhku2017/">facebook page</a>in which we shared articles and our progress we made through the iGEM project.</p>
 +
 +
 +
<p> Click the links below to explore </p>
  
−
<h2>CSS Buttons</h2>
+
<div style=" right: 0;  bottom: 0;  left: 0;  padding: 1rem;  text-align: center;">
−
<button onlick="#"><a href="http://google.com/"> Open this website</a></button>
+
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Hong_Kong_HKU/Engagement" class="button">Engagement</a>  
−
<a href="#" class="button">Engagement</a>  
+
  
−
<a href="#" class="button">Safety</a>  
+
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Hong_Kong_HKU/safety" class="button">Safety</a>  
  
−
<a href="#" class="button">integration</a>
+
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Hong_Kong_HKU/HP/Gold_Integrated" class="button">Integration</a>  
  
 +
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Hong_Kong_HKU/HP/Gold_Integrated" class="button">Collaboration</a>
 +
</div>
  
 
</body>
 
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 15:10, 1 November 2017

Having done the experiments to put our diagnostic tool to the test, we needed to know what our end-users and the general public thought about our design. Through the activities conducted in the Human practices we tried to answer the aforementioned question. Our Human practice is divided into 3 sections

  • Public Engagement
  • Collaboration
  • Integration
  • Safety

In order to widen our reach we made a facebook pagein which we shared articles and our progress we made through the iGEM project.

Click the links below to explore