Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong HKU/HP/Gold Integrated"

m (Add nav bar removed judge box)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
<div class="column full_size">
 +
<h1> Marketing research - End user surveys </h1>
 +
 +
<h2> Why, Who and What of our survey </h2> 
 +
 +
<p>We aim to make our diagnostic method as user-friendly as possible, hence, we conducted a marketing research to better understand the concerns of frontline medical workers. Among the survey takers were medical workers from various fields (General Physician, Neurosurgeon, Paediatrician, and intern). They reflected that the accuracy of the diagnostic tests is the most important, followed by the ease of implementing the test. Cost-effectiveness is also considered. </p>
 +
 +
<h2> Integrating the result into our project </h2>
 +
 +
<p> Modifications were then made to our DNA nanostructure design after obtaining the above invaluable feedback. Our design is optimized to improve the absolute readout, and we aim to further improve the signal: noise ratio to reduce false positives. Instead of ABTS, we will use a simpler fluorescent-based assay for speedier results. We are also looking into result indicators as simple as a color change, as well as prototyping our product as a diagnostic kit that can be used easily by frontline medical workers. </p>
 +
  
−
<h1>Gold Medal and Integrated Human Practices</h1>
 
  
−
<p>This page will contain information for your Gold medal Human Practices work, which you can also use to nominate your team for the Best Integrated Human Practices page. To make things easier, we have combined the Gold medal page with the Best Integrated Human Practices page since we expect the work to overlap considerably. </p>
 
−
<p>iGEM teams are unique and leading the field because they "go beyond the lab" to imagine their projects in a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.</p>
 
−
<p>Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest. </p>
 
−
<p>For more information, please see the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Competition/Human_Practices">Human Practices page</a>.</p>
 
−
</div>
 
−
<div class="clear"></div>
 
  
  
−
<div class="column half_size">
 
−
<h3>Gold Medal Criterion #1</h3>
 
−
<p>Expand on your silver medal activity by demonstrating how you have integrated the investigated issues into the design and/or execution of your project.</p>
 
  
−
</div>
 
  
−
<div class="column half_size">
 
−
<h3>Best Integrated Human Practices Special Prize</h3>
 
  
−
<p>
 
−
To compete for the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Judging/Awards">Best Integrated Human Practices prize</a>, please describe your work on this page and also fill out the description on the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Judging/Judging_Form">judging form</a>.
 
−
<br><br>
 
−
You must also delete the message box on the top of this page to be eligible for this prize.
 
−
</p>
 
−
</div>
 
−
<div class="clear"></div>
 
−
<div class="column full_size">
 
−
<h5>Inspiration</h5>
 
−
<p>Here are a few examples of excellent Integrated Human Practices work:</p>
 
−
<ul>
 
−
<li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:INSA-Lyon/Integrated_Practices">2016 INSA Lyon</a></li>
 
−
<li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:UofC_Calgary/Integrated_Practices">2016 UofC Calgary</a></li>
 
−
<li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Practices">2015 Bielefeld</a></li>
 
−
<li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Practices">2015 Edinburgh</a></li>
 
−
</ul>
 
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 14:48, 28 October 2017

Marketing research - End user surveys

Why, Who and What of our survey

We aim to make our diagnostic method as user-friendly as possible, hence, we conducted a marketing research to better understand the concerns of frontline medical workers. Among the survey takers were medical workers from various fields (General Physician, Neurosurgeon, Paediatrician, and intern). They reflected that the accuracy of the diagnostic tests is the most important, followed by the ease of implementing the test. Cost-effectiveness is also considered.

Integrating the result into our project

Modifications were then made to our DNA nanostructure design after obtaining the above invaluable feedback. Our design is optimized to improve the absolute readout, and we aim to further improve the signal: noise ratio to reduce false positives. Instead of ABTS, we will use a simpler fluorescent-based assay for speedier results. We are also looking into result indicators as simple as a color change, as well as prototyping our product as a diagnostic kit that can be used easily by frontline medical workers.