Revision as of 01:19, 2 November 2017

Design

The studying of our model resulted in the discovery of 3 ion channels suited for our project. More information on these ion channels is mentioned below. The next step was measuring the rhythm of our transfected cells as well as the influence certain drugs have on this rhythm, With the results from the Patch Clamp showing indeed a change in frequency of the rhythm, the team started looking at the future. We started brainstorming about the theoretical design if our device. Further research brought the encapsulation method to light, the measurement of the rhythm in the human body would be done through a Multi-Electrode Array (MEA), as suggested by the nanotech company IMEC. More information about the in-vivo concept could be found below.

Patch Clamp

Whole-cell patch clamp is an electrophysiological technique to study ionic currents by measuring membrane potential directly on single-cell level. More specific: it allows you to measure the electrical current or voltage differences across the membrane of a single cell. In our HEKcite project, we aimed to create stably oscillating HEK cells, by transfecting three key ion channels. Afterwards we wanted to influence this rhythm by adding drugs. Thus, it is crucial for our project to study our ion channels in the most precise manner.

MEA (referentie: paper Braeken)

A multi-microelectrode array is a device that measures electrical activity in cells, usually neurons. It is a transducer converting the voltage induced by ionic currents through the cell membrane to a current due to the movement of electrons. The MEA that was used for the experiments with the HEK cells can measure both extra- and intracellularly. The array is based on CMOS technology. A wide range of MEAs are commercially available, ranging from a few electrodes to several thousands. One of the most important advantages of MEAs is the possibility to stimulate and record each electrode separately. Sometimes amplification is already included in the chip, as is the case for the one from IMEC. The MEA chip is mounted on a printed circuit board and has a small glass chamber on top where the cells go. The intracellular measurement is made possible by the MEA’s option to create nanopores in the cell’s membrane by applying voltage pulses. These holes are so small, they hardly affect the cell’s survival chance and the cell membrane repairs itself quickly. For measurement with the MEA, the peaks of the membrane potential of the cells need to be sharp/steep enough. This has to be verified before measuring. The output of the MEA is an analog signal.

In order to use cells with an oscillating membrane potential as a means of continuous drug monitoring in the blood, a method needed to be established via which the cells could efficiently and safely be employed in a medical context. We first performed a preliminary investigation, during which various strategies were explored and evaluated for their potential clinical applicability.

To successfully measure the concentration of different drugs in the blood, the HEKcite cells have to be in perpetual contact with the bloodstream. As one might expect, simply injecting these cells was ruled out quite early in the evaluation process, as this would be both dangerous to the patient and would generate a situation in which it would be an absurdly difficult (if not impossible) task to measure the membrane potential of the circulating cells.

Further downstream the screening process, we stumbled upon the cell encapsulation technique. This method not only seemed promising for our project, but was already being investigated by multiple research groups for potential future applications. Furthermore, we were able to schedule appointments with two different experts willing to advance our understanding of in vitro encapsulation of living cells.

Before these meetings, we assessed the possible dangers and implications regarding capsules. This exploratory analysis revealed a list of primary risk factors associated with capsule implantation. This list includes (but is not limited to): Possible viral infections, risk of thrombosis, DNA leakage out of the capsule, and an immune response against the foreign material. Bernard Schneider, a senior scientist in the neurodegenerative studies laboratory in the university of Lausanne, was able to provide us with a list of answers to various questions like the ones listed above.

Type of cell

First of all, we made an inquiry about the type of cells we would use. HEK 293 cells, like the ones we created a sinus rhythm in, are known to have a high growth rate. This would result in the cells completely filling the capsule, which would cause them to starve and die. Furthermore, they contain adenoviral DNA, which makes them unacceptable for entering the human body. These two factors reduce the applicability of our HEK cells strictly to this proof of concept study. For this reason, we started looking for other cells.

As noted by professor Cosson, the key decision criteria for choosing new cells are: (1) the ease with which they are engineered, (2) the ability to store them in vitro in large batches, (3) the ease to be cultured in cheap media, and finally (4), the cells need to be in biosafety category 1 to comply with regulation. Two cell types that meet these requirements, human myoblasts and ARPE-19 cells, were investigated to be used in the finalized capsule.

Specifics of chip in capsule

Secondly, we asked professor Schneider about the possibility of a chip in a capsule, and whether drugs could enter it through the bloodstream. The answer was that, in principle, these should both be possible. The implant itself could be quite simple, as it could simply be an empty space that can be filled with a gel and cells. Electrodes, used for the continuous measurements of the changing membrane potential, could be introduced, with the cells being measured on an electrode array. As noted by Schneider however, one should keep in mind that the cells need oxygen and nutrients. Thus, when a chip is inserted, the exchange surface should be large enough to accommodate for the number of cells in the capsule.

The implantable device we eventually aim to create consists of several parts. First and foremost, there is the multi-microelectrode array (MEA) for which we collaborated with IMEC, a leading research center in micro- and nanoelectronics. The output of this chip still needs amplification, filtering and conversion from analog to digital. This all will be included in a second chip. This second chip will also include Bluetooth to send the signal to for example a bracelet the patient is wearing, and components for power supply. The cells and the electronics are then encapsulated by two membranes. The purpose of these membranes is to keep the cells from escaping while letting nutrients and the medication to be measured in. All of these components will now be discussed in more detail.

The signal processing of the MEA output includes amplification of the signal, filtering and DC to AC conversion. This can all be included in one integrated circuit. There are some companies on the market that produce these, Intan being one example. The output of this chip is digital.

Membranes (bronnen: prof+paper)

An obvious design parameter for the capsules is the biocompatibility of the membranes to minimize host response. To help us decide on a suitable material we spoke to prof. Patterson of the department of Materials Engineering. Together we decided on the following specifications of the membrane: the material should be inert, non-degradable, cheap and of course biocompatible. Taking all this into account we landed on Polypropylene (PP). This polymer is a well-known biocompatible material which is commercially available. Because of its use in multiple applications it is well characterized. It is also relatively non-degradable and inert. The two membranes that encapsulate the chips and cells should be adhered to each other with welding techniques, since glues don’t tend to hold on PP. To manufacture the membranes in the desired shape, injection molding could be used. A hydrogel to grow the cells on, is not needed since the device only needs a sheet shaped 2D layer of cells. It could however be useful to place between the cells and the membranes to keep everything in place. A commonly used hydrogel that could be used is Polyethylene Glycol (PEG). Since PP is commercially available, the membranes could just be ordered and not custom made and designed, which reduces cost.

Entry of drugs and nutrients into the device

Regarding the entry of drugs into the device, the answer lies within neovascularization, according to Schneider. The formation of new blood vessels and their subsequent contact with the membrane should allow tight contact between blood and device. To establish whether a specific molecule can enter the capsule however, the structure of the semipermeable membrane and the size of its pores are determinant. Before commercial application of such an apparatus, these parameters should first be assessed.

While entry of drugs is an important parameter, the possible leakage of DNA out of the capsule is another. It has, however, been proved in multiple clinical trials, that the amount of DNA released from capsules is negligible. Professor Schneider (and we agree on this) thus believes the use of such capsules as ethically acceptable.

Advection

The change of oxygen concentration over time can partly be attributed to advection over the cells. The following equation accounts for this phenomenon.\[\frac{\partial C_{O_2}}{\partial t}=-\nabla V-V\nabla C_{O_2}\] If the liquid is incompressible, we can assume that \[\nabla V=0\] Blood is slightly compressible, but for simplicity make this approximation. We can do this because the Mach number is very small and the blood thus behaves as incompressible. \[Ma=\frac{V}{C}=\frac{1\rightarrow100 ^{cm}/_s}{1540 ^m/_s}\] Hence, we can state that \[\frac{\nabla C_{O_2}}{\nabla t}=-V\nabla C_{O_2}\]

Navier-Stokes

Navier-Stokes can be used only for Newtonian fluids. Blood is a non-Newtonian fluid which means we again have to make an approximation.
\[\rho\displaystyle(\frac{\nabla V}{\nabla t}+v\nabla v)=\underbrace{-\nabla p}_\text{forces due to pressure differences}+\underbrace{\mu\nabla^2v}_\text{forces due to viscosity}+\underbrace{f}_\text{body force}\] The left hand side is equal to zero since the blood has a constant velocity on average. This means that the Navier-Stokes equation can be simplified to \[\nabla p=\mu\nabla^2v+f\]

Blood through membrane: Darcy

Since the membrane is a semi-permeable and thus prous, the flow of the blood through it can be describes by Darcy’s law: \[Av=-\kappa(\nabla p-fg)\] with A, the cross-sectional area of the pores, equal to 0,45 μm, g=9,81 N/kg and κ???? NINA HELP!

Diffusion: Fick

Besides active flow through the membrane, there’s also diffusion. This process can be described by Fick’s law of diffusion: \[\frac{\nabla C_{O_2}}{\nabla t}=\nabla(D_{O_2}\nabla C_{O_2})\] We can approximate that the oxygen is distributed homogeneously around the membrane and thus the equation becomes \[\frac{\nabla C_{O_2}}{\nabla t}=D_{O_2}\nabla^2 C_{O_2})\] We assume steady state \[\implies C_{O_2}(x)=C_0+(C_1-C_0)\frac{x}{d}\]in which C₀ is equal to the C_0₂ outside the membrane and C₁ is the C_0₂ inside the membrane.

Total

When we combine all these equations, we get the following equations: \[\begin{cases} \frac{\partial C_{O_2}}{\partial t}=D_{O_2}\nabla^2C_{O_2}-v\nabla C_{O_2}-\underbrace{QC_{cell}}_\text{consumption}\\ \frac{\partial C_{cell}}{\partial t}=\underbrace{AC_{cell}(1-\alpha C_{cell}}_\text{proliferation}-\underbrace{dC_{cell}}_\text{death} \end{cases}\] If the oxygen consumption follows the Michaelis-Menten kinetic then \[Q=\frac{C_{O_2}}{K_m+C_{O_2}}\] The death rate of the cells is a function of the oxygen concentration and can for example be described by the following equation: \[d=f(C_{O_2})=1-\frac{C_{O_2}}{K_d+C_{O_2}}\].

Risk of thrombosis

When implanting small capsules, one should always consider the risk of that device ending up in the bloodstream, and causing thrombosis. In our case, the macro-capsule would be relatively big (bigger than a 2€ coin in general). This makes it physically improbable that such a device could enter the blood stream and cause thrombosis.

Immune reaction

Last but not least, we inquired about possible dangers associated with immune responses against such an implanted device. When implanting a device (or something else that is considered ‘foreign’) into the human body, the typical reaction will be the foreign body response. To avoid going into great detail, the endpoint of this reaction is the formation of fibrous tissue that encapsulates the foreign body. Important to note, is that a low level of inflammation would help this kind of neovascularization (which is positive), but chronic inflammation caused by cellular hypoxia will cause an excess of fibrosis which will prevent oxygen and nutrients from entering the capsule.

References:

1. Sulfi, S. and Timmis, A. (2006). Ivabradine - the first selective sinus node If channel inhibitor in the treatment of stable angina. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 60(2), pp.222-228.

2. White, H. (1997). Clinical Significance of Animal Seizure Models and Mechanism of Action Studies of Potential Antiepileptic Drugs. Epilepsia, 38(s1), pp.S9-S17.
Patsalos, P. (2005). Properties of Antiepileptic Drugs in the Treatment of Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsies. Epilepsia, 46(s9), pp.140-148.
Huguenard, J. (2002). Block of T -Type Ca2+ Channels Is an Important Action of Succinimide Antiabsence Drugs. Epilepsy Currents, 2(2), pp.49-52.

3. Onuma, H., Lu, Y., Tomizawa, K., Moriwaki, A., Tokuda, M., Hatase, O. and Matsui, H. (1998). A calcineurin inhibitor, FK506, blocks voltage-gated calcium channel-dependent LTP in the hippocampus. Neuroscience Research, 30(4), pp.313-319.
Panyi, G., Gáspár, R., Krasznai, Z., ter Horst, J., Ameloot, M., Aszalós, A., Steels, P. and Damjanovich, S. (1996). Immunosuppressors Inhibit Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 221(2), pp.254-258.
Lee, S., Hahn, S., Min, G., Kim, J., Jo, S., Choe, H. and Choi, B. (2011). Inhibitory Actions of HERG Currents by the Immunosuppressant Drug Cyclosporin A. The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 15(5), p.291.

4. Lathuilière, A., Cosson, S., Lutolf, M., Schneider, B. and Aebischer, P. (2014). A high-capacity cell macroencapsulation system supporting the long-term survival of genetically engineered allogeneic cells. Biomaterials, 35(2), pp.779-791.

5. Lathuilière, A., Mach, N. and Schneider, B. (2015). Encapsulated Cellular Implants for Recombinant Protein Delivery and Therapeutic Modulation of the Immune System. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(5), pp.10578-10600.

6. Uludag, H., De Vos, P. and Tresco, P. (2000). Technology of mammalian cell encapsulation. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 42(1-2), pp.29-64.

7. Steele, J., Hallé, J., Poncelet, D. and Neufeld, R. (2014). Therapeutic cell encapsulation techniques and applications in diabetes. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 67-68, pp.74-83.

8. Jans, D., Callewaert, G., Krylychkina, O., Hoffman, L., Gullo, F., Prodanov, D. and Braeken, D. (2017). Action potential-based MEA platform for in vitro screening of drug-induced cardiotoxicity using human iPSCs and rat neonatal myocytes. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 87, pp.48-52.

Difference between revisions of "Team:KU Leuven/Design"