Difference between revisions of "Team:Austin UTexas/Results"

Line 314: Line 314:
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
<p style="font-family: verdana"> In order to grow <i>Lactobacillus plantarum</i>, we used MRS broth in a CO<sub>2</sub> incubator without shaking. After characterizing the growth of the bacteria, we aimed to transform it with pMSP3535. We first attempted several protocols, including Landete 2014 (11) and Speer 2012 (12). However, we found success using a variation of the Welker protocol (13). After preparing the necessary solutions, we followed the Welker protocol with some minor differences, including inoculation of bacterial stocks in 10 mL of MRS broth rather than 25mL; utilizing a CO<sub>2</sub> incubator without shaking; subculturing cells in 0.9M NaCl rather than glycine, transforming with 100 ng of plasmid DNA  instead of the 200 ng that the protocol recommends, and electroporating with a resistance of 3kV and 600Ω.</p> <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Austin_UTexas/Protocols">. For more information about the protocols including broth recipe and transformation procedure, click here!</a></p>
+
<p style="font-family: verdana"> In order to grow <i>Lactobacillus plantarum</i>, we used MRS broth in a CO<sub>2</sub> incubator without shaking. After characterizing the growth of the bacteria, we aimed to transform it with pMSP3535. We first attempted several protocols, including Landete 2014 (11) and Speer 2012 (12). However, we found success using a variation of the Welker protocol (13). After preparing the necessary solutions, we followed the Welker protocol with some minor differences, including inoculation of bacterial stocks in 10 mL of MRS broth rather than 25mL; utilizing a CO<sub>2</sub> incubator without shaking; subculturing cells in 0.9M NaCl rather than glycine, transforming with 100 ng of plasmid DNA  instead of the 200 ng that the protocol recommends, and electroporating with a resistance of 3kV and 600Ω. For more information about the protocols including broth recipe and transformation procedure, <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Austin_UTexas/Protocols">. click here!</a></p>
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
 
<p style="font-family: verdana"> Our first plasmid we chose to transform <i> Lactobacillus plantarum </i> with was pMSP3535. This plasmid expresses erythromycin resistance and contains the pAMB1 origin.  
 
<p style="font-family: verdana"> Our first plasmid we chose to transform <i> Lactobacillus plantarum </i> with was pMSP3535. This plasmid expresses erythromycin resistance and contains the pAMB1 origin.  
After cells were electroporated, they recovered overnight in the appropriate recovery media. They were plated on MRS agar plates supplemented with 10 μg/mL erythromycin and left to grow for 2 days. </p>
+
After cells were electroporated, they recovered overnight in the appropriate recovery media. They were plated on MRS agar plates supplemented with 10 μg/mL erythromycin and left to grow for 2 days. The results of our transformation can be seen in <b>Figure 14</b>.</p>
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
Line 329: Line 329:
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
<p style="font-family: verdana">Colonies from each transformation plate were grown up in MRS broth supplemented with 10 μg/mL erythromycin. The subsequent day, they were streaked on  10μg/mL erythromycin MRS agar plates to verify resistance to erythromycin. The overnight cultures and re-streaks are shown in <b>Figure 15</b> and <b>Figure 16</b> respectively.</p>
+
<p style="font-family: verdana">Colonies from each transformation plate were grown up in MRS broth supplemented with 10 μg/mL erythromycin. The next day, they were streaked on  10μg/mL erythromycin MRS agar plates to verify resistance to erythromycin. The overnight cultures and re-streaks are shown in <b>Figure 15</b> and <b>Figure 16</b> respectively.</p>
  
 
<strong><p style="font-family: verdana"> Genomic and plasmid sequence verification is underway.</p></strong>
 
<strong><p style="font-family: verdana"> Genomic and plasmid sequence verification is underway.</p></strong>

Revision as of 01:11, 2 November 2017


Results

Although bacteria can naturally synthesize GABA, we wanted to increase expression of the gadB gene and subsequently GABA production in order to give our intended probiotic, Lactobacillus plantarum, a more potent medicinal quality, with the idea that this GABA-overproducing probiotic can then be consumed by patients with bowel disorders, hypertension or anxiety (1). Overexpression of the gadB gene will be accomplished by placing it under the control of either the P8 or P32 constitutive promoters from Lactococcus lactis (2).

To make our GABA-producing probiotic, we ultimately needed to assemble a GABA overexpression cassette plasmid. The intention is that bacteria containing this GABA overexpression cassette plasmid should produce high levels of GABA. In order to assemble this plasmid, we decided to utilize the Golden Gate Assembly method. In short, Golden Gate Assembly is a relatively new cloning method that allows for the creation of a multi-part DNA assembly (i.e. cassette plasmid) in a single reaction through the use of DNA parts containing specific, predefined suffixes and prefixes with recognition sites for Type IIs restriction enzymes (e.g. BsmBI and BsaI). The specificity of these suffixes and prefixes provides directionality of the desired DNA parts during the assembly process. For our purposes, we used the MoClo Yeast Tool Kit developed by John Dueber (3).

We decided to first assemble and test our Golden Gate plasmids in E. coli, which was chosen due to the ease in which we could genetically manipulate it. We then wanted to use these Golden Gate plasmids to genetically manipulate L. plantarum. This part of the project required us to assemble a Golden Gate compatible shuttle vector (that is replicable in both E. coli and L. plantarum ) and transform L. plantarum. Our experimental results are detailed below.


Click on one of the images below to learn more about our results!