Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Contribution"

Line 19: Line 19:
 
<h1>Protocol design for PHA production characterisation BBa_K1149051</h1>
 
<h1>Protocol design for PHA production characterisation BBa_K1149051</h1>
  
−
<div class=text2><div class=text2left>We decided to characterize the biobrick <a href=”http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051”>BBa_K1149051</a> (<a href=”https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College”>Imperial College London 2013</a>) using flow cytometry. By staining our cells with a Nile Red solution (0.3mg/mL of DMSO), this technique of Fluorescence-activated cell sorting allowed us to measure the intensity of the Nile Red stained cell containing P3HB. </br></br></div></div>
+
<div class=text2><div class=text2left>We decided to characterize the biobrick <a href=”http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051”>BBa_K1149051</a> (<a href=”https://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College”>Imperial College London 2013</a>) using flow cytometry. By staining our cells with a Nile Red solution (0.3mg/mL of DMSO), this technique allowed us to measure the intensity of the Nile Red stained cell containing P3HB. </br></br></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class=text2right><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/51/P3HBPARISBETTENCOURT.png"><span>Flow cytometer analysis of cell stained with NileRed with BBa_K1149051</span></div></div>
  
 
<div class=text2><div class=text2left>Protocol for staining:
 
<div class=text2><div class=text2left>Protocol for staining:
Line 40: Line 42:
 
<div class=text1>Then we used a Beckman Coulter Life Science ® flow cytometer machine to measure the intensity. We took 1 µL of every sample including a negative control (from an overnight culture of wild type <i>E.Coli DH5 α</i>), and analyse them through the FL2 (575 BP filter) and FL3 (620 BP filter) channel.<div>
 
<div class=text1>Then we used a Beckman Coulter Life Science ® flow cytometer machine to measure the intensity. We took 1 µL of every sample including a negative control (from an overnight culture of wild type <i>E.Coli DH5 α</i>), and analyse them through the FL2 (575 BP filter) and FL3 (620 BP filter) channel.<div>
  
−
<div class=text1>Flow Cytometry was used to characterize the part as we believe it is the best technique. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting allows for the measurement of hundreds of samples each day at a minimal cost, whereas using GC/MS is not only expensive, but you can only run a few samples a day.</div>
+
<div class=text1>Flow Cytometry was used to characterize the part as we believe it is the best technique. Using this technique allows for the measurement of hundreds of samples each day at a minimal cost, whereas using GC/MS is not only expensive, but you can only run a few samples a day.</div>
  
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 23:49, 1 November 2017

CONTRIBUTION

Protocol design for PHA production characterisation BBa_K1149051

We decided to characterize the biobrick BBa_K1149051 (Imperial College London 2013) using flow cytometry. By staining our cells with a Nile Red solution (0.3mg/mL of DMSO), this technique allowed us to measure the intensity of the Nile Red stained cell containing P3HB.

Flow cytometer analysis of cell stained with NileRed with BBa_K1149051
Protocol for staining:
  • Thaw the samples on ice for 10 minutes
  • Take 1mL of solution
  • Centrifuge for 5 minutes at 3000g at 4°C
  • Discard the supernatant
  • Resuspend the cells with 1 mL of ice-cold TSE Buffer
  • Thaw on ice for 10 minutes
  • Centrifuge for 5 minutes at 3000g at 4 degree Celsius
  • Resuspend the cells with 1mL of ice-cold sterile water
  • Add 1µL of Nile Red solution Vortex the tubes
  • Place the tubes 5 minutes in the dark
  • Centrifuge for 5 minutes at 3000g at 4°C
  • Resuspend the cells with 1mL of ice cold water and centrifuge (twice)


Then we used a Beckman Coulter Life Science ® flow cytometer machine to measure the intensity. We took 1 µL of every sample including a negative control (from an overnight culture of wild type E.Coli DH5 α), and analyse them through the FL2 (575 BP filter) and FL3 (620 BP filter) channel.
Flow Cytometry was used to characterize the part as we believe it is the best technique. Using this technique allows for the measurement of hundreds of samples each day at a minimal cost, whereas using GC/MS is not only expensive, but you can only run a few samples a day.

Centre for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI)
Faculty of Medicine Cochin Port-Royal, South wing, 2nd floor
Paris Descartes University
24, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques
75014 Paris, France
bettencourt.igem2017@gmail.com