Team:Heidelberg/Collaborations

iGEM TEAM HEIDELBERG 2017

---

COLLAPSE NAVIGATION

---

• People
  • Team
  • Attributions
  • Sponsoring
  • For Judges
  • Giant Jamboree
• Project
  • Overview
  • Background & Design
  • PACE
  • PREDCEL
  • Results Summary
  • Software Validation
  • Organosilicons
  • Protein Interaction
  • Cytochrome Engineering
  • Optogenetics
  • CRISPR Cas9
  • InterLab Study
  • Achievements
• Parts
  • Overview
  • Basic Parts
  • Composite Parts
  • Improved Part
  • Parts Collection
  • Part List
  • RFC
• Modeling
  • Overview
  • Phage Titer
  • Mutagenesis Induction
  • Mutation Rate Estimation
  • Lagoon Contamination
  • Medium Consumption
  • Interactive Web Tools
• Software
  • AiGEM Overview
  • DeeProtein
  • GAIA
  • SafetyNet
  • MAWS 2.0
• Human Practices
  • Overview
  • Integrated Human Practices
  • Expert Interviews
  • Safety & Security
  • Public Engagement
  • Education
  • Collaborations
• Notebook
  • Overview
  • Methods
  • Materials
  • Notebook Database
• Toolbox Guide

COLLABORATIONS

Mutagenesis Plasmid Inter-Lab Study

In our directed evolution approaches PREDCEL and PACE, we select for beneficial mutations in a protein of interest encoded on a M13 phage genome. In order to generate a pool of protein mutants to select from in the first place, the efficient introduction of mutations during phage genome replication is essential. Mutagenesis-inducing plasmids (MPs) that enhance the mutation rate in E. coli by inhibiting DNA repair mechanisms have been described badran2015development. When transformed into E. coli hosts, these plasmids should cause mutation rates several orders of magnitude higher than usually expected under laboratory conditions. The exact mutation rate induced by different mutagenesis plasmids could, however, vary between laboratories, as E. coli growth conditions and hence expression strength of the mutagenic proteins (e.g. error-prone polymerase subunits) could differ. However, robust induction of high mutation rates are critical for the success of PREDCEL and PACE and hence of major importance for other teams to reproduce our directed evolution methods. Therefore, we performed a small inter-lab study to evaluate the performance of different mutagenesis inducing plasmids and find the construct setup most robust and hence suitable for future iGEM teams to use for in vivo directed evolution. To enable an inter-lab comparison, we developed a standardized mutagenesis plasmid test kit and assay and distributed it to iGEM team BOKU Vienna, ETH Zurich, Freiburg and Stuttgart. We are very grateful for their kind support and excited to share the results from this small inter lab study with all iGEM teams

Mutagenesis Assay Kit
We shipped 3 mutagenesis plasmids (#1-3). All mutagenesis inducing plasmids contain an arabinose inducible promoter P_BAD. Upstream of P_BAD the araC protein is encoded in the opposite direction and regulates the activity of the P_BAD promoter. The expression cassette downstream P_BAD comprises multiple, different mutagenesis supporting elements, e.g. error-prone polymerase subunits. According to literature badran2015development the mutagenesis plasmids #1-3 were expected to cause increasingly high mutation rates.

Mutagenesis Assay – Spontaneous Resistance Acquisition
Due to exceptionally high mutagenesis levels of E. coli cells transformed with one of the mutagenesis plasmids, these cells can more quickly adopt to environmental changes. Hence, one way to measure the mutagenesis levels is simply to quantify the level of spontaneous antibiotic resistance acquisition. Therefore, E. coli were transformed with mutagenesis plasmids or remain untransformed (as control) followed by incubation in presence or absence of different antibiotics on agar plates. After 18-21 hours of incubation at 37 °C, colonies are counted. A higher number of colonies (i.e. clones with spontaneous resistance acquired) thereby indicates a higher mutation rate in the corresponding E. coli population due to the presence of the mutagenesis plasmid.

Results from the Study
To decide which mutagenesis plasmid to recommend to future iGEM teams for in vivo directed evolution approaches such as PREDCEL, it was essential to determine the mutagenesis plasmid setup most robustly functioning across different laboratories. The results of iGEM team BOKU Vienna, ETH Zürich, Freiburg and Stuttgart indicate that MP #1 induces mutations most reliably . Hence, we recommend to use mutagenesis plasmid #1 for PREDCEL experiments, which is also noted in our corresponding RFC. The results are shown and described on our MP InterLab page

Collaboration 2

As a first step to contribute to this year's iGEM competition we decided to participate in iGEM's fourth International Interlaboratory Study along with many other teams from around the world. This study is organized by iGEM's measurement committee in an effort to establish standardized, reliable and repeatable measurement tools for the iGEM community and the synthetic biology community as a whole. This year's iGEM InterLab study is about establishing a standardized protocol for the measurement of GFP using a plate reader. To start things off we needed a plate reader that is qualified to measure GFP fluorescence. Namely, Tecan Infinite M200 Pro plate reader. Additionally, we needed competent E.coli DH5. These were prepared from glycerol stocks. Together with the material iGEM had provided we were ready for work. Throughout our experiments, we tested 8 plasmids (2 controls and 6 test devices) by measuring the OD₆₀₀ and the fluorescence of the cells carrying the constructs. The workflow can be separated into four segments. The first segment is the transformation of all plasmids into competent DH5 cells.

Collaboration 2

As a first step to contribute to this year's iGEM competition we decided to participate in iGEM's fourth International Interlaboratory Study along with many other teams from around the world. This study is organized by iGEM's measurement committee in an effort to establish standardized, reliable and repeatable measurement tools for the iGEM community and the synthetic biology community as a whole. This year's iGEM InterLab study is about establishing a standardized protocol for the measurement of GFP using a plate reader. To start things off we needed a plate reader that is qualified to measure GFP fluorescence. Namely, Tecan Infinite M200 Pro plate reader. Additionally, we needed competent E.coli DH5. These were prepared from glycerol stocks. Together with the material iGEM had provided we were ready for work. Throughout our experiments, we tested 8 plasmids (2 controls and 6 test devices) by measuring the OD₆₀₀ and the fluorescence of the cells carrying the constructs. The workflow can be separated into four segments. The first segment is the transformation of all plasmids into competent DH5 cells.

Collaboration 2

As a first step to contribute to this year's iGEM competition we decided to participate in iGEM's fourth International Interlaboratory Study along with many other teams from around the world. This study is organized by iGEM's measurement committee in an effort to establish standardized, reliable and repeatable measurement tools for the iGEM community and the synthetic biology community as a whole. This year's iGEM InterLab study is about establishing a standardized protocol for the measurement of GFP using a plate reader. To start things off we needed a plate reader that is qualified to measure GFP fluorescence. Namely, Tecan Infinite M200 Pro plate reader. Additionally, we needed competent E.coli DH5. These were prepared from glycerol stocks. Together with the material iGEM had provided we were ready for work. Throughout our experiments, we tested 8 plasmids (2 controls and 6 test devices) by measuring the OD₆₀₀ and the fluorescence of the cells carrying the constructs. The workflow can be separated into four segments. The first segment is the transformation of all plasmids into competent DH5 cells.