Difference between revisions of "Team:TU Dresden/Project/Secretion"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<div class="contentbox"> | <div class="contentbox"> | ||
<h1 class="box-heading"> background</h1> | <h1 class="box-heading"> background</h1> | ||
| − | <p>Efficient and low cost production of valuable natural compounds, like proteins, has developed into a leading industry. Starting, by choosing a suitable production host followed by establishing a profitable downstream process, every step is constantly optimized to increase overall yields. | + | <p>Efficient and low cost production of valuable natural compounds, like proteins, has developed into a leading industry. Starting, by choosing a suitable production host followed by establishing a profitable downstream process, every step is constantly optimized to increase overall yields. </p> |
| − | When it comes to choosing a production host, Bacillus subtilis is particularly interesting: the Gram-positive model organism can be easily genetically modified and has powerful secretion capacities. <a target="_blank" href ="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Reindert_Nijland/publication/23656731_Optimization_of_Protein_Secretion_by_Bacillus_subtilis/links/09e415136142e1554c000000/Optimization-of-Protein-Secretion-by-Bacillus-subtilis.pdf">[1]</a> | + | <p>When it comes to choosing a production host, Bacillus subtilis is particularly interesting: the Gram-positive model organism can be easily genetically modified and has powerful secretion capacities. <a target="_blank" href ="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Reindert_Nijland/publication/23656731_Optimization_of_Protein_Secretion_by_Bacillus_subtilis/links/09e415136142e1554c000000/Optimization-of-Protein-Secretion-by-Bacillus-subtilis.pdf">[1]</a></p> |
| − | In this part of EncaBcillus we aimed at making use of the B. subtilis native advantages and combined them with Peptdiosomes – a new innovative cultivation platform for functional co-cultivation. Multiple Peptidosomes, with each encapsulating one specific strain that secrets one protein of interest. By doing so, the production of multi-complex proteins cloud be achieved by separated subpopulations all in one reaction hub. | + | <p>In this part of EncaBcillus we aimed at making use of the B. subtilis native advantages and combined them with Peptdiosomes – a new innovative cultivation platform for functional co-cultivation. Multiple Peptidosomes, with each encapsulating one specific strain that secrets one protein of interest. By doing so, the production of multi-complex proteins cloud be achieved by separated subpopulations all in one reaction hub.</p> |
| − | To ensure the assembly of proteins outside of the Peptidosomes we further characterized the SpyTag/SpyCatcher system. Theses functional units can be attached to any protein of interest and upon secretion will result in a covalent isopeptide bond between the SpyTag/SpyCatcher partners. (2) | + | <p>To ensure the assembly of proteins outside of the Peptidosomes we further characterized the SpyTag/SpyCatcher system. Theses functional units can be attached to any protein of interest and upon secretion will result in a covalent isopeptide bond between the SpyTag/SpyCatcher partners. (2) |
| − | The system originates from Streptococcus pyogenes and since it’s discovery it has been under constant development (3). In our project we applied codon-adapted B. subtilis specific tags and reduced the SpyCatcher in length to enhance it´s usability when translationally fused to a protein of interest. Thus, decreasing the chances of the tag interfering with overall protein folding. (4) | + | The system originates from Streptococcus pyogenes and since it’s discovery it has been under constant development (3). In our project we applied codon-adapted B. subtilis specific tags and reduced the SpyCatcher in length to enhance it´s usability when translationally fused to a protein of interest. Thus, decreasing the chances of the tag interfering with overall protein folding. (4)</p> |
| − | To demonstrate the applicability of both tags we fused them to a green (sfGFP) and a red (mCherry) fluorescent protein, enabling an easy detectable output. (For more details please check our Design section) | + | <p>To demonstrate the applicability of both tags we fused them to a green (sfGFP) and a red (mCherry) fluorescent protein, enabling an easy detectable output. (For more details please check our Design section) |
Since a core part of this project involves secretion, we included a signal peptide in front of all our constructs. (click here to learn more about our Signal Peptide Toolbox). | Since a core part of this project involves secretion, we included a signal peptide in front of all our constructs. (click here to learn more about our Signal Peptide Toolbox). | ||
| − | To evaluate the efficiency of the secretion process we monitored the fluorescence of B. subtilis strains carrying our constructs and compared them to the wild type. In order to prove the functionality of the SpyTag/SpyCatcher system we performed an SDS-Page demonstrating the formation of a fusion protein derived from co-incubated supernatants. | + | To evaluate the efficiency of the secretion process we monitored the fluorescence of B. subtilis strains carrying our constructs and compared them to the wild type. In order to prove the functionality of the SpyTag/SpyCatcher system we performed an SDS-Page demonstrating the formation of a fusion protein derived from co-incubated supernatants. </p> |
</p> | </p> | ||
Revision as of 12:37, 26 October 2017
