Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<p>All genetic constructs and plasmids have been created using the RFC10 <a target="_blank" href ="http://parts.igem.org/Help:Standards/Assembly/RFC10">RFC10</a> and/or <a target="_blank" href ="http://parts.igem.org/Assembly_standard_25">RFC25</a>cloning standard. Enzymes used were obtained from New England BioLabs©. Cloning procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer`s protocols. </p> | <p>All genetic constructs and plasmids have been created using the RFC10 <a target="_blank" href ="http://parts.igem.org/Help:Standards/Assembly/RFC10">RFC10</a> and/or <a target="_blank" href ="http://parts.igem.org/Assembly_standard_25">RFC25</a>cloning standard. Enzymes used were obtained from New England BioLabs©. Cloning procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer`s protocols. </p> | ||
<p>For submission of our parts to the registry, all Biobricks were cloned into the pSB1C3 backbone. The created genetic constructs were verified by sequencing (Eurofins or GATC sequencing services). All designed plasmids were stored in <i>Escherichia coli</i> DH10β (see <a target="_blank" href ="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Experiments">Experiments and Protocols</a> for details). In this project, we used integrative single-copy B. subtilis specific vectors that stably integrate into the genome at designated loci.[3]</p> | <p>For submission of our parts to the registry, all Biobricks were cloned into the pSB1C3 backbone. The created genetic constructs were verified by sequencing (Eurofins or GATC sequencing services). All designed plasmids were stored in <i>Escherichia coli</i> DH10β (see <a target="_blank" href ="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Experiments">Experiments and Protocols</a> for details). In this project, we used integrative single-copy B. subtilis specific vectors that stably integrate into the genome at designated loci.[3]</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h3><b>Biosensor Characterization</b></h3> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>First, we investigated the detection range towards different beta-lactam families as well as the sensitivity of the created biosensor. Therefore, we conducted plate reader experiments and disk diffusion assays to test our biosensor in liquid as well as on solid conditions. We recorded the luminescence signal and growth behavior (see <a target="_blank" href ="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Experiments">Experiments and Protocols</a> for details) of our biosensor strains in the presence of six different beta-lactam antibiotics. We also included physiological controls that lack one or two of the genetic constructs of the complete biosensor machinery. | ||
+ | Furthermore, we analyzed the impact of deleting the <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> gene <i>penP</i> - encoding a beta-lactamase (which has not been studied intensively yet) - on the luminescence output. The strain W168 <i>penP::kan<sup>R</sup></i>was created via Long-Flanking Homology PCR (see <a target="_blank" href ="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Experiments">Experiments and Protocols</a> for details). We also investigated, if the different beta-lactam antibiotics induce the promoter driving PenP.</p> | ||
+ | |||
<h3><b>Encapsulation into Peptidosomes</b></h3> | <h3><b>Encapsulation into Peptidosomes</b></h3> |
Revision as of 15:55, 28 October 2017