Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
<h3><b>1. Determination of Inhibitory Antibiotic Concentrations</b></h3> | <h3><b>1. Determination of Inhibitory Antibiotic Concentrations</b></h3> | ||
<p>Before starting the actual tests regarding the functionality of the beta-lactam biosensor, several pretests have been conducted to determine the optimal antibiotic concentration for the subsequent experiments. Therefore, we analyzed the concentration dependent effect of six different beta-lactam antibiotics on the growth of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> W168 and a strain missing the functional beta-lactamase PenP (W168 <i>penP::kan<sup><i>R</i></sup></i>). The beta-lactams tested in this and the following assays were: Ampicillin, Carbenicillin, Cefoperazone, Cefoxitin, Cefalexin and Penicillin G. As controls we chose water(dH<sub>2</sub>O) and the antibiotic Bacitracin, which does not belong to the group of beta-lactams. </p> | <p>Before starting the actual tests regarding the functionality of the beta-lactam biosensor, several pretests have been conducted to determine the optimal antibiotic concentration for the subsequent experiments. Therefore, we analyzed the concentration dependent effect of six different beta-lactam antibiotics on the growth of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> W168 and a strain missing the functional beta-lactamase PenP (W168 <i>penP::kan<sup><i>R</i></sup></i>). The beta-lactams tested in this and the following assays were: Ampicillin, Carbenicillin, Cefoperazone, Cefoxitin, Cefalexin and Penicillin G. As controls we chose water(dH<sub>2</sub>O) and the antibiotic Bacitracin, which does not belong to the group of beta-lactams. </p> | ||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <figure class="makeresponsive floatright" style="width: 60%"> | ||
+ | <figcaption><b>Table 2: Antibiotic concentrations in [µg µl<sup>-1</sup>] (final concentration in well) used in the killing assay carried out in triplicates. | ||
+ | </b></figcaption> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/86/T--TU_Dresden--P_Biosensor_Table2_betalactamconcentrations.png" | ||
+ | alt="Table 2: Beta-Lactam concentrations tested in preliminary assays" class="zoom"> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Several preliminary plate reader experiments have been implemented using a 96 well plate format, in which we tested at least six different concentrations of each antibiotic. These assays were not performed in triplicates. Finally, the concentrations were narrowed down to two concentrations per antibiotic (see Table 3) that would cause a slight growth inhibition, to use in the following assay performed in triplicates (see Figure 4). All tests regarding antibiotic effects were implemented with Mueller Hinton Medium. The strains were induced after 1 hour of growth at 37°C in the plate reader. The growth was followed by measuring the optical density at OD=600nm for 18 hours every 5 minutes. </p> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <figure class="makeresponsive floatright" style="width: 60%"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://2017.igem.org/File:T--TU_Dresden--P_Biosensor_Figure4_killingassay.png" | ||
+ | alt="Figure 4: Results from growth inhibition experiment" class="zoom"> | ||
+ | <figcaption><b>Figure 4: Growth curves of W168 <b>(1a-f)</b> and W168 <i>penP::kan<sup><i>R</i></sup></i> <b>(2a-f)</b> showing an effect after treatment with the tested antibiotics indicated in the legend above the graphs. </b>Samples were induced after 1 hour with <b>(a)</b> ampicillin 1 and 2, <b>(b)</b> carbenicillin 1 and 2, <b>(c)</b> cefoperazone 1 and 2, <b>(d)</b> cefalexin 1 and 2, <b>(e)</b> cefoxitin 1 and 2 as well as with <b>(f)</b> penicillin G 1 and 2. Every graph shows also the controls, where we induced with bacitracin 1 and 2 and dH<sub>2</sub>O. Number 1 and 2 represent the two different concentrations tested of each antibiotic. The concentrations refer to table 3. | ||
+ | </b></figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
<p>We expected a higher growth inhibition at higher antibiotic concentrations and a higher sensitivity to the antibiotics of the <i>penP</i> mutant. Adding distilled water to the culture should not show any effect on the growth of both tested strains.</p> | <p>We expected a higher growth inhibition at higher antibiotic concentrations and a higher sensitivity to the antibiotics of the <i>penP</i> mutant. Adding distilled water to the culture should not show any effect on the growth of both tested strains.</p> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>As expected, the data from the pretest performed in triplicates in Figure 4 show, that the presence of the beta-lactamase PenP plays a key role in facilitating survival at higher antibiotic concentrations. The wild type strain B. subtilis W168 is therefore able to grow at higher antibiotic concentrations as the mutant W168 <i>penP::kan<sup>R</sup></i> when treated with ampicillin, carbenicillin, cefoperazone, cefoxitin and penicillin G (see Figure 4). However, this was not the case for cefalexin and bacitracin. Here, we could not observe any difference in growth inhibition between the wild type and the <i>penP</i> mutant in regard to the tested concentrations (see Figure 4). Cefalexin showed a very strong inhibitory effect on the growth of both wildtype and the mutant. For this reason, we chose a relatively weak final concentration (see Table 4 below). Furthermore, we noticed a growth inhibition of the mutant W168 <i>penP::kan<sup>R</sup></i> during the stationary phase, especially when treated with Carbenicillin, Cefalexin and Penicillin G (data not shown). For this reason, we selected weaker antibiotic concentrations for the upcoming experiments with this mutant.</p> |
− | < | + | |
+ | <p>From these first experiments, we selected the following antibiotic concentrations for the upcoming plate reader experiments with the biosensor strains:</p> | ||
</div class="contentbox"> | </div class="contentbox"> |
Revision as of 15:27, 29 October 2017