Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p>With a really straight forward experiment, including the help of the pH-indicator we were able to prove that a diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the surrounding environment is possible. We transferred Peptidosomes to water or LB-Media and measured the time it took for the colour to disappear, or in other words, the time it takes for the coloured solution inside the cage to diffuse out of it. </p> | <p>With a really straight forward experiment, including the help of the pH-indicator we were able to prove that a diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the surrounding environment is possible. We transferred Peptidosomes to water or LB-Media and measured the time it took for the colour to disappear, or in other words, the time it takes for the coloured solution inside the cage to diffuse out of it. </p> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
<p>Proving that diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the environment is possible, we wanted to know next if diffusion between two peptidosomes which are in direct contact is possible. For this experiment only one of the two connected peptidosomes contained coloured solution. Over the lapse of around 1.5 hours, it was possible to observe how the colour was disseminating to the non-coloured peptidosome until it reached an equilibrium (Figure X), proving that there is diffusion, or intercommunication, between the two peptidosomes. </p> | <p>Proving that diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the environment is possible, we wanted to know next if diffusion between two peptidosomes which are in direct contact is possible. For this experiment only one of the two connected peptidosomes contained coloured solution. Over the lapse of around 1.5 hours, it was possible to observe how the colour was disseminating to the non-coloured peptidosome until it reached an equilibrium (Figure X), proving that there is diffusion, or intercommunication, between the two peptidosomes. </p> | ||
− | <figure> | + | <p> </p> |
+ | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 90%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/97/T--TU_Dresden--diffusion.png" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/97/T--TU_Dresden--diffusion.png" | ||
alt="Diffusion between Peptidosomes" | alt="Diffusion between Peptidosomes" | ||
Line 149: | Line 151: | ||
<figcaption><b>Figure 5: Diffusion between Peptidosomes </b> The time sequence of the experiment is shown. The yellow peptidosome (with pH indicator) was fused with an empty peptidosome (transparent) and the change was then observed over time (1.5 h).</figcaption> | <figcaption><b>Figure 5: Diffusion between Peptidosomes </b> The time sequence of the experiment is shown. The yellow peptidosome (with pH indicator) was fused with an empty peptidosome (transparent) and the change was then observed over time (1.5 h).</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
<p>Additionally, to the previous described method, we used a microinjection-technique to inject a coloured solution to the inside of the peptidosome (figure XXX). To close the hole that was probably opened on the membrane by the introducing the glass capillary, the peptidosome was exposed again for 5 min to CO<sub>2</sub>. Afterwards it was transferred to water. As shown in figure XXX D) the peptidosome was stable. </p> | <p>Additionally, to the previous described method, we used a microinjection-technique to inject a coloured solution to the inside of the peptidosome (figure XXX). To close the hole that was probably opened on the membrane by the introducing the glass capillary, the peptidosome was exposed again for 5 min to CO<sub>2</sub>. Afterwards it was transferred to water. As shown in figure XXX D) the peptidosome was stable. </p> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 80%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 80%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | ||
Line 180: | Line 183: | ||
<p>The experiment to test the tolerance was performed as follows: <i>B. subtilis</i> culture was divided in four treatments, varying the pH of the culture in each one; 7 (normal growth condition as a control), 8, 9, and 10. NaOH was used to induce the different changes in the pH for each treatment, and was added after one hour of cultivation. The experiment was carried out in a plate reader to follow the change of the optical density (OD<sub>600</sub>) which correlates with bacterial growth. </p> | <p>The experiment to test the tolerance was performed as follows: <i>B. subtilis</i> culture was divided in four treatments, varying the pH of the culture in each one; 7 (normal growth condition as a control), 8, 9, and 10. NaOH was used to induce the different changes in the pH for each treatment, and was added after one hour of cultivation. The experiment was carried out in a plate reader to follow the change of the optical density (OD<sub>600</sub>) which correlates with bacterial growth. </p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 70%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 70%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e3/T--TU_Dresden--bacillusinpH.png" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e3/T--TU_Dresden--bacillusinpH.png" | ||
Line 186: | Line 190: | ||
<figcaption><b>Figure 7: Comparison of <i><b>B.subtilis</b></i> cell growth at different pH values </b> Shown is the change in optical density over the cultivation period. Each graph represents a culture approach. In all batches, NaOH or water (red dot) was induced after one hour to adjust a certain pH value.</figcaption> | <figcaption><b>Figure 7: Comparison of <i><b>B.subtilis</b></i> cell growth at different pH values </b> Shown is the change in optical density over the cultivation period. Each graph represents a culture approach. In all batches, NaOH or water (red dot) was induced after one hour to adjust a certain pH value.</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | + | <p> </p> | |
<p>The graph shows the growth of the organisms under each condition. It can be observed that from pH 7 to 9, no significant change in the growth is observed. However, under pH 10, the organism stops its growth. To check if the bacteria was still viable after the high pH treatment, it was transferred to growth plates with neutral pH. There, it was observed that <i>B. subtilis</i> was able to recover and growth normally, meaning that the organism can survive the process of encapsulation. </p> | <p>The graph shows the growth of the organisms under each condition. It can be observed that from pH 7 to 9, no significant change in the growth is observed. However, under pH 10, the organism stops its growth. To check if the bacteria was still viable after the high pH treatment, it was transferred to growth plates with neutral pH. There, it was observed that <i>B. subtilis</i> was able to recover and growth normally, meaning that the organism can survive the process of encapsulation. </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 255: | Line 259: | ||
<p>When performing that experiment, we discovered bacterial growth in the supernatant where the peptidosomes were incubated. To figure out the reason for this, cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy (<b>cryo-SEM</b>) was used to image bacteria-loaded peptidosomes. The results are showed below. </p> | <p>When performing that experiment, we discovered bacterial growth in the supernatant where the peptidosomes were incubated. To figure out the reason for this, cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy (<b>cryo-SEM</b>) was used to image bacteria-loaded peptidosomes. The results are showed below. </p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
<figure> | <figure> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/53/T--TU_Dresden--sem1.png" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/53/T--TU_Dresden--sem1.png" | ||
Line 261: | Line 266: | ||
<figcaption><b>Figure 9: SEM pictures</b> A) whole peptidosome, B); C); D) Details of the membrane, E); F); G); H) Details of the bacteria in the peptidosome membrane</figcaption> | <figcaption><b>Figure 9: SEM pictures</b> A) whole peptidosome, B); C); D) Details of the membrane, E); F); G); H) Details of the bacteria in the peptidosome membrane</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
<p>As observed in the images, some cells are completely or only partially integrated into the membrane, composed by a mesh of fibers. This cells found on the outer surface of the membrane, if released, can be responsible for the bacterial growth on the supernatant. Therefore we designed a second growth experiment, in which also the whole supernatant of each peptidosome was plated with the purpose of observing the amount of bacteria released there. </p> | <p>As observed in the images, some cells are completely or only partially integrated into the membrane, composed by a mesh of fibers. This cells found on the outer surface of the membrane, if released, can be responsible for the bacterial growth on the supernatant. Therefore we designed a second growth experiment, in which also the whole supernatant of each peptidosome was plated with the purpose of observing the amount of bacteria released there. </p> | ||
<p>Two extra treatments were tested, the first one consisted in adding “washing” steps, meaning that the peptidosomes were transferred twice to fresh media before their incubation. We hypothesized that the bacteria on the outer membrane would be released and left behind after the transfers. The second treatment that we tested consisted in pre-incubating the peptidosome in LB broth adjusted to have an acid pH, this with the finality of closing the membrane to entrap even more the cells, triggering the self-assembly of the unreacted Fmoc-FF solution still present in the peptidosome. </p> | <p>Two extra treatments were tested, the first one consisted in adding “washing” steps, meaning that the peptidosomes were transferred twice to fresh media before their incubation. We hypothesized that the bacteria on the outer membrane would be released and left behind after the transfers. The second treatment that we tested consisted in pre-incubating the peptidosome in LB broth adjusted to have an acid pH, this with the finality of closing the membrane to entrap even more the cells, triggering the self-assembly of the unreacted Fmoc-FF solution still present in the peptidosome. </p> | ||
Line 322: | Line 328: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p>In conclusion, here we proved the possibility of Peptidosome surface decoration with histidine-tagged molecules that can be used for various applications where enzymatic activity of the surface of Peptidosome or Peptidosome immobilization is required. Surface decoration protocol is compatible with almost any goals due to its flexibility, as the decoration procedure can be performed before and after Peptidosome formation in the specific Binding/Washing buffer or just in the LB media. </p> | <p>In conclusion, here we proved the possibility of Peptidosome surface decoration with histidine-tagged molecules that can be used for various applications where enzymatic activity of the surface of Peptidosome or Peptidosome immobilization is required. Surface decoration protocol is compatible with almost any goals due to its flexibility, as the decoration procedure can be performed before and after Peptidosome formation in the specific Binding/Washing buffer or just in the LB media. </p> | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 14:25, 31 October 2017