Figure : Measurements of the fluorescence (A) or the steady state normalized fluorescence (B) over time of BBa_K2333432 (pTet mScarlet-I pdt E), with and without Lon at 50ng/mL ATC, and with Lon readjusted at 85ng/mL ATC. Each data point represents the geometric mean of 10,000+ cells from each of three biological replicates, with at least 10,000 cells collected for each replicate. Shaded region represents +/- standard deviation. Reporter constructs were used on 1C3 while a 3K3 version of BBa_K2333434 (pLac mf-Lon) was used, <a href='https://2017.igem.org/Team:William_and_Mary/Readjustment' style='text-decoration: underline;'>click</a>, through modeling
<figcaption><div style='padding-left: 5px;padding-top: 15px; color: #808080; width = "80%; font-size: 14px;'>Figure 3: Measurements of the fluorescence (A) or the steady state normalized fluorescence (B) over time of BBa_K2333432 (pTet mScarlet-I pdt E), with and without Lon at 50ng/mL ATC, and with Lon readjusted at 85ng/mL ATC. Each data point represents the geometric mean of 10,000+ cells from each of three biological replicates, with at least 10,000 cells collected for each replicate. Shaded region represents +/- standard deviation. Reporter constructs were used on 1C3 while a 3K3 version of BBa_K2333434 (pLac mf-Lon) was used.
+
</figure>
<div style='padding-top: 60px;'></div>
<div style='padding-top: 60px;'></div>
Revision as of 01:42, 1 November 2017
Degradation Rates
Although Cameron and Collins already demonstrated the functionality of protein degradation tags (pdt), and the Mesoplasma florum Lon (mf-Lon) protease in E. coli, we noted that they did their work exclusively using genomically integrated constructs. Since the majority of iGEM teams work exclusively or close to exclusively on plasmid constructs, we first wanted to confirm and characterize the parts using iGEM backbones. To do this we assembled constitutive and ATC inducible constructs carrying the red fluorescent protein mScarlet-I, tagged with each of our six different pdts, or left untagged as a control. Further, to ensure that our project will work with a variety of different proteins, we made identical constructs encoding for superfolder GFP (sfGFP), and preformed preliminary characterization.
Text here
Construct schematics here
Results and graphs here.
Speed Control
Once we confirmed that degradation was working reliably, and that we did in fact have a variety of different strength tags, we then tested whether or not we could change gene expression speed. Using the ATC inducible mScarlet-I constructs from the previous section, we confirmed that we could change the gene expression speed of our constructs. Further, we then compared our observed results to our mathematical predictions based on degradation rate and found that the speed change appeared to be 1/degradation rate, exactly as our model would predict. Together, this represents the first experimental confirmation of the relationship between gene expression speed and degradation rate.
While we have demonstrated that we can see a real speed change, you might remember that in our math section we noted that the steady state value is given as the production rate divided by the degradation rate. This means that though we are increasing the speed of gene expression, we are also decreasing the steady-state value. While some applications may only care about a gene’s expression an on or off signal, and not about the magnitude of expression, we wanted our system to be usable in any system. Since in our model gene expression speed is only regulated by degradation, it should be possible to readjust our steady-state value back up to its original expression. Using pdt E as an example, we measured the time to steady state with and without mf-Lon at a given ATC induction level. We then showed that by increasing the ATC concentration (increasing production rate), we can return the steady state of the protease condition to the no protease condition while maintaining the same speed change, exactly as our model predicts.