Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Caffeine undergoes degradation by CYP1A2 through an initial N3- demethylation into three xanthine derivates, 81.5% paraxanthine, 10.8% theobromine and 5.4% theophylline <x-ref>perera2010caffeine</x-ref>. The chemical structure of these three primary metabolites of caffeine only differ in their methylation pattern (Fig.3). | Caffeine undergoes degradation by CYP1A2 through an initial N3- demethylation into three xanthine derivates, 81.5% paraxanthine, 10.8% theobromine and 5.4% theophylline <x-ref>perera2010caffeine</x-ref>. The chemical structure of these three primary metabolites of caffeine only differ in their methylation pattern (Fig.3). | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
{{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox| | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox| | ||
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/76/T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_Caffeine_3.png| | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/76/T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_Caffeine_3.png| | ||
Figue 2: Chemical structure of caffeine| Caffeine is a substrate of CYP1A2 <x-ref>perera2010caffeine</x-ref>.| pos = left }} | Figue 2: Chemical structure of caffeine| Caffeine is a substrate of CYP1A2 <x-ref>perera2010caffeine</x-ref>.| pos = left }} | ||
− | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox| | |
+ | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/95/T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_Theobromine_Praxanthin_Theophylline.png| | ||
+ | Figue 3: Chemical structures of Paraxanthine, Theobromine and Theophylline | By N3 demethylation caffeine is metabolized into these three xanthine derivates by CYP1A2 <x-ref>perera2010caffeine</x-ref>.| pos = left }} | ||
}}}} | }}}} | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
{{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/2/2d/T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_CYP_dithinide_geschnitten_MK.png/139px-T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_CYP_dithinide_geschnitten_MK.png| | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/2/2d/T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_CYP_dithinide_geschnitten_MK.png/139px-T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_CYP_dithinide_geschnitten_MK.png| | ||
Figue 4: Test of CYP1A2 conformation by sodium dithionite| | Figue 4: Test of CYP1A2 conformation by sodium dithionite| | ||
− | After the addition of sodium dithionite to the E.coli cell lysate (expressing CYP1A2) a color change could be detected as the solution turned darker/brown. |pos = right}} | + | After the addition of sodium dithionite to the E.coli cell lysate (expressing CYP1A2) a color change could be detected as the solution turned darker/brown. |pos = right |
+ | }} | ||
}}}} | }}}} | ||
Revision as of 18:37, 1 November 2017
Cytochrome Engineering
Modulating CYP1A2 product specifity
Introduction
Enzymes, i.e. proteins mediating specific, catalytic functions, are amongst the most powerful molecular machines invented by nature. Since decades, humans utilize naturally occurring enzymes as bio detergents (e.g. in washing powderThe engineering of novel enzymes catalyzing reactions that do not or only inefficiently occur in nature holds great promise for biotechnological production of regenerative fuel, biomaterials and novel pharmaceuticals, e.g. based on Organosilicons. However, so far, enzyme engineering has typically been a time-consuming, elaborate, expensive and inefficient process, usually requiring laborious, iterative trial-and-error optimization of engineered candidates
To accelerate the development of novel enzymes, our team harnessed the engineering strategy nature uses: Evolution.