Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
<h1>Optimized PREDCEL Workflow</h1> | <h1>Optimized PREDCEL Workflow</h1> | ||
− | The used PREDCEL workflow in general is described in the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Heidelberg/Predcel">PREDCEL Protocol</a>. However, we had to conduct some adaptations for a successful PREDCEL run: Once the culture is grown to an OD600 of 0.6, the Mutagenesis Plasmid was activated by exchanging the initial medium containing glucose (repressing the MP) by medium containing arabinose. Then the culture is inoculated and incubated for three hours to propagate the phages before the supernatant containing the phages is transferred for the first time. After three rounds of passaging, the obtained phage supernatant is used to infect another E.coli strain, ensuring fast propagation of phages without selection pressure over night. This intermediate step prevents a phage washout and ensures a sufficient phage titer that is needed for the inoculation of the next PREDCEL culture. This procedure has to be repeated after each round until the evolution process is completed | + | The used PREDCEL workflow in general is described in the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Heidelberg/Predcel">PREDCEL Protocol</a>. However, we had to conduct some adaptations for a successful PREDCEL run: Once the culture is grown to an OD600 of 0.6, the Mutagenesis Plasmid was activated by exchanging the initial medium containing glucose (repressing the MP) by medium containing arabinose. Then the culture is inoculated and incubated for three hours to propagate the phages before the supernatant containing the phages is transferred for the first time. After three rounds of passaging, the obtained phage supernatant is used to infect another E.coli strain, ensuring fast propagation of phages without selection pressure over night. This intermediate step prevents a phage washout and ensures a sufficient phage titer that is needed for the inoculation of the next PREDCEL culture. This procedure has to be repeated after each round until the evolution process is completed (Fig. 5). To get to know more about on how phage titers behaves under different conditions, have a closer look on our <a href=https://2017.igem.org/Team:Heidelberg/Model/Phage_Titer#cyp_model>Modeled Phage Titers</a>. |
}}}} | }}}} | ||
Revision as of 19:49, 1 November 2017
Cytochrome Engineering
Modulating CYP1A2 product specifity
Introduction
Enzymes, i.e. proteins mediating specific, catalytic functions, are amongst the most powerful molecular machines invented by nature. Since decades, humans utilize naturally occurring enzymes as bio detergents (e.g. in washing powderThe engineering of novel enzymes catalyzing reactions that do not or only inefficiently occur in nature holds great promise for biotechnological production of regenerative fuel, biomaterials and novel pharmaceuticals, e.g. based on Organosilicons. However, so far, enzyme engineering has typically been a time-consuming, elaborate, expensive and inefficient process, usually requiring laborious, iterative trial-and-error optimization of engineered candidates
To accelerate the development of novel enzymes, our team harnessed the engineering strategy nature uses: Evolution.