Moritz P95 (Talk | contribs) m |
Moritz P95 (Talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
The GC-MS analysis of the second organosilicon <i>ethyl 2-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)propanoate</i> is demonstrated in the Figure 6 and 7. The educt dimethyl(phenyl)silane was completely converted, and the product emerges at a retention time of 9.2 minutes (Fig. 8). The mass spectrometry analysis verified the product with a mass of 236 Dalton (Fig. 9). | The GC-MS analysis of the second organosilicon <i>ethyl 2-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)propanoate</i> is demonstrated in the Figure 6 and 7. The educt dimethyl(phenyl)silane was completely converted, and the product emerges at a retention time of 9.2 minutes (Fig. 8). The mass spectrometry analysis verified the product with a mass of 236 Dalton (Fig. 9). | ||
The reaction without the enzyme represents our negative control and is depicted in Figure 9. As expected, only the two educts emerged after their respective retention time. | The reaction without the enzyme represents our negative control and is depicted in Figure 9. As expected, only the two educts emerged after their respective retention time. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | In summary, sufficient concentrations of the organosilicon products were synthesized, and in case of the organosilicon (3) also purified to >98% chemical purity. | ||
{{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/92/T--Heidelberg--GCAnilineCompound.png|Figure 5:|Gas chromatogram for the reaction of educt (1) and (5) to the product (3). 11.7 minutes retention time, indicates product formation. Unconverted educts converge 6.9 and 7.2, 7.4 minutes|}} | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/92/T--Heidelberg--GCAnilineCompound.png|Figure 5:|Gas chromatogram for the reaction of educt (1) and (5) to the product (3). 11.7 minutes retention time, indicates product formation. Unconverted educts converge 6.9 and 7.2, 7.4 minutes|}} | ||
Line 83: | Line 85: | ||
− | + | ||
{{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ef/T--Heidelberg--GCNonAninlineCompound.png|Figure 7:|Gas chromatogram for the reaction of educt (2) and (5) to the product (4). 9.2 minutes retention time indicates product formation.|}} | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ef/T--Heidelberg--GCNonAninlineCompound.png|Figure 7:|Gas chromatogram for the reaction of educt (2) and (5) to the product (4). 9.2 minutes retention time indicates product formation.|}} |
Revision as of 00:13, 2 November 2017
Organosilicons
Synthesis of organosilicons and cytochrome engineering
Introduction
Organosilicons are organometallic compounds that contain carbon-silicon bonds. In comparison to their respective organic analogs, they display different intrinsic properties due to the distinct chemical properties of silicon. The bond formation tendencies of silicon have a significant impact on their bioavailability and their applicability in pharmacyRecent publications cluster their unique features into three categories: The first category comprises the chemical properties of silicon bonds. Typically, silicon forms longer bonds with variable angles, which allows diverse ring conformations and thus alterations in reactivity. Furthermore, its preference to form single bonds leads to chemical compounds that have a higher intrinsic stability than their carbon analogs.
The second category represents the bioavailability of organosilicons. As they are more lipophilic compared to their respective carbon counterparts, they are able to easily overcome the membrane barrier of cells. The third - and most important - category addresses the potential pharmaceutical application of carbon-silicon compounds. Due to their aforementioned tendency to form single rather than double or triple bonds, they display a viable source for stable pharmaceuticals, which are inaccessible as carbon-based molecules. Additionally, the more electropositive characteristic of silicon facilitates hydrogen bond formation and conveniently increases the acidity of compounds. Considering these facts, organosilicons offer major opportunities in the synthesis of bioactive pharmaceuticals, the design of pro-drugs, as well as a safe medicine with a genuine biomedical benefit.
Recently, a cytochrome c variant was described, which is able to catalyze the formation of C-Si bonds (Referenz) and therefore offers the opportunity to further develop C-Si bond catalyzing enzymes.
Our Idea
According to our idea to evolve proteins by PACE and PREDCEL, we also envisioned to further develop the previously engineered cytochrome c. Therefore, we linked organosilicon-production directly to a reporter expression via a small molecule-sensing riboswitchExperimental procedures
Design and cloning of the riboswitch and cytochrome c constructs
The educts for the organosilicon synthesis were commercially available in the case of dimethyl(phenyl)silane (2) and ethyl 2-diazopropanoate (5) or were custom synthesized by Fabian Ebner (Greb group, ACI Heidelberg, Germany) in the case of 4-(dimethylsilyl)aniline (1). The corresponding riboswitch was designed accordingly using the MAWS 2.0 software developed by the iGEM Team Heidelberg 2015. The most favorable sequence (BBa_K2398555) was ordered as oligos, which were annealed in a single-cycle Touch-Down PCR, decreasing the temperature by 0.1°C x sec-1 from 95°C to 10°C. The sequence was ordered as oligos and not as gBlock to ensure overhangs of a specific length at the 5’ and 3’ ends. Vector and reporter were amplified via PCR and purified by gel extraction (Qiagen). The final plasmid was assembled by using equimolar concentrations of vector, reporter, and the riboswitch in a golden gate reaction. The plasmid was transformed into DH10beta cells and purified by plasmid purification (Qiagen).To make organosilicon production more accessible for other iGEM Teams, we codon optimized the wild-type cytochrome c derived from Rhodotermus marinus and cloned it into the pSB1C3 vector. We are proud to present you this part as our best basic part (BBa_K2398000). For our purpose, we used a triple mutant created by F. Arnold
Riboswitch binding assay
Results
Synthesis of the organosilicon compounds
The GC-MS analysis of the second organosilicon ethyl 2-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)propanoate is demonstrated in the Figure 6 and 7. The educt dimethyl(phenyl)silane was completely converted, and the product emerges at a retention time of 9.2 minutes (Fig. 8). The mass spectrometry analysis verified the product with a mass of 236 Dalton (Fig. 9). The reaction without the enzyme represents our negative control and is depicted in Figure 9. As expected, only the two educts emerged after their respective retention time.
In summary, sufficient concentrations of the organosilicon products were synthesized, and in case of the organosilicon (3) also purified to >98% chemical purity.
Validation of the Riboswitch
We further tested our synthesized compounds by using the NanoLuc Reporter linked to our riboswitch. As expected, the addition of 15 mM of the compound (3) resulted in a higher emission rate compared to the sample containing only 5 mM. Remarkably, the specifically designed compound (3) for the riboswitch showed significantly higher activity compared to the original precursor compound (1), indicating a higher binding affinity (Fig. 10). The increase in enzyme activity upon addition of the specific riboswitch activator was determined in relation to the enzyme activity in presence of the initial substrate. The result, demonstrated in Figure 11, shows a 1.5 fold enzyme activity when using the newly synthesized substrate.Outlook