Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
{{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/66/T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_Bar_chart_2.png| | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/66/T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_Bar_chart_2.png| | ||
− | Figure 6: Plaque assays performed after two passages of CYP1A2 PREDCEL | + | Figure 6:| Plaque assays performed after two passages of CYP1A2 PREDCEL |
with either adding 100 µM theophylline or 300 µM demonstrating the | with either adding 100 µM theophylline or 300 µM demonstrating the | ||
functionality of the Accessory Plasmid and the Selection Plasmid, | functionality of the Accessory Plasmid and the Selection Plasmid, | ||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c1/T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_Mutationen_PREDCEL_MP.png| | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c1/T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_Mutationen_PREDCEL_MP.png| | ||
− | Figure 7: Sequencing results of eight plaques after 6 iterations of | + | Figure 7: |Sequencing results of eight plaques after 6 iterations of |
the PREDCEL workflow with MP4 illustrating recurrently appearing | the PREDCEL workflow with MP4 illustrating recurrently appearing | ||
mutations of the CYP1A2 gene. Recurrent mutations with amino acid | mutations of the CYP1A2 gene. Recurrent mutations with amino acid | ||
exchange are indicated in red, without amino acid exchange in orange. | exchange are indicated in red, without amino acid exchange in orange. | ||
Single mutations with amino acid exchange are shown in yellow, and | Single mutations with amino acid exchange are shown in yellow, and | ||
− | without amino acid exchange in blue. | + | without amino acid exchange in blue.| |
}} | }} | ||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
{{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b7/T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_HPLC_results_MK.png| | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b7/T--Heidelberg--Team_Heidelberg_2017_HPLC_results_MK.png| | ||
− | Figure 8: | + | Figure 8:| |
Cell lysates were used for high-performance liquid chromatography to | Cell lysates were used for high-performance liquid chromatography to | ||
distinguish theophylline (left peak) from caffeine (right peak). This | distinguish theophylline (left peak) from caffeine (right peak). This | ||
assay allows a quantification of the educt and the product of CYP1A2 | assay allows a quantification of the educt and the product of CYP1A2 | ||
− | and thus a conclusion about the conversion efficiency can be made. | + | and thus a conclusion about the conversion efficiency can be made.| |
}} | }} |
Revision as of 00:16, 2 November 2017
Cytochrome Engineering
Directing CYP1A2 product specificity
Introduction
Enzymes, i.e. proteins mediating specific, catalytic functions, are amongst the most powerful molecular machines invented by nature. Since decades, humans utilize naturally occurring enzymes as bio detergents (e.g. in washing powderThe engineering of novel enzymes catalyzing reactions that do not or only inefficiently occur in nature holds great promise for biotechnological production of regenerative fuel, biomaterials and novel pharmaceuticals, e.g. based on Organosilicons. However, so far, enzyme engineering has typically been a time-consuming, elaborate, expensive and inefficient process, usually requiring laborious, iterative trial-and-error optimization of engineered candidates
To accelerate the development of novel enzymes, our team harnessed the engineering strategy nature uses: Evolution.