Difference between revisions of "Team:William and Mary/Collaborations"

 
(39 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
{{Team:William_and_Mary/HEADER2}}
 
{{Team:William_and_Mary/HEADER2}}
  
<!--website by John Mitchell, iGEM 2016
+
 
Bootstrap template by creative-tim-->
+
  
 
<html lang="en">
 
<html lang="en">
Line 42: Line 41:
  
 
<br></br>
 
<br></br>
 +
<div style='padding-top: 50px;'></div>
  
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/f9/T--William_and_Mary--interlab4.jpeg" width="380px"/></center>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e1/T--William_and_Mary--collaborate4.jpeg" width="430px"/></center>
  
  
Line 49: Line 49:
 
<div style='padding-top: 50px;'></div>
 
<div style='padding-top: 50px;'></div>
  
<div style = 'padding-left: 190px; padding-bottom: 20px;font-size: 25px' ><b>Introduction</b></div>
+
<div style = 'padding-left: 14%; padding-bottom: 10px;font-size: 25px' ><b>Background</b></div>
  
<div style = 'padding-right: 190px; padding-left: 190px; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >Inter-laboratory studies have great implications in both academia research and industry. Comparison of results can not only help determine the characteristics of certain products, but can also validate the test method and determine the source of uncertainty. Synthetic biology aims to achieve predicable gene expression outcomes <sup>[1]</sup>, but challenges for this goal still exist on every level from parts design, circuity complexity to measurement methods. iGEM InterLab study is exactly designed to unravel the source of unpredictability and to quantify the degree of variability [2], the logical of which William and Mary iGEM team shares deeply. We have been an active participator of the InterLab Study since 2015 (the second year William and Mary joined the iGEM family) and we are very honored to be able to continue to contribute this study. </div>
+
<div style='background: #808080; margin: 0px 14% 20px 14%; height:1px;></div>
  
<div style='padding-top: 40px;'></div>
+
<div style='padding-top: 0px;'></div>
 +
<div style = 'padding-right: 14%; padding-left: 14%; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >This year our team has focused on creating a system that will allow other iGEM teams to easily control the gene expression speed of an arbitrary protein without requiring a costly wholesale redesign of existing architecture. To that end, we characterized how protein degradation tags (pdt) can be used to modularly change the speed of mScarlet-I, a fast folding, high quantum yield red fluorescent protein. We also created a set of easy-cloning parts which enable future iGEM teams to clone our parts without needing intermediates. At the UVA Mid-Atlantic meetup, we were particularly intrigued by University of Maryland iGEM’s copper sensor. After discussing with them, we agreed that we would collaborate on improving the function of their copper sensor (<a href = "http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2477013" style='text-decoration: underline;'>Bba_K2477013</a>). Since they primarily wanted to use their copper sensor as an educational tool, reducing the time required to get results would help them keep students engaged, as well as enable them to use their device in labs or outreach activities that did not have a lot of time. </div>
  
<div style = 'padding-right: 190px; padding-left: 190px; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >This year, the objective of InterLab is to test the precision of gene expression over different RBS devices with a GFP reporter. Teams from around the world are using the standard biological parts, same laboratory bacterium and standardized measurement procedure provided in a detailed protocol. Our team was excited about this year’s project and the improvements that InterLab has made such as the dried down DNA and extra reagents. We started our study on August, 8th.</div>
+
<div style='padding-top: 15px;'></div>
  
 +
<div style = 'padding-right: 14%; padding-left: 14%; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >To help UMD increase their gene expression speed, we proposed that we jointly create and characterize modified versions of their copper sensor parts with pdts (Figure 1). Since time was short and Maryland did not have access to a cell sorter, we simply had them ship us their parts, and then performed the modifications and characterizations at William and Mary, before sending the modified parts back for use. On the other end, William and Mary sent blinded speed constructs to Maryland for testing. We hoped that this would enable us to confirm degradation characterization in platforms other than our own, and potentially show speed change as well.</div>
  
 +
<div style='padding-top: 50px;'></div>
 +
<center>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/bc/T--William_and_Mary--circuit4.jpeg' width = "80%"/>
 +
<figcaption><div style='padding-left: 20%;padding-right:20%; padding-top: 15px; color: #808080; font-size: 14px;'>Figure 1: Schematic of University of Maryland's modified copper sensing part </div></figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
</center>
  
 
<div style='padding-top: 80px;'></div>
 
<div style='padding-top: 80px;'></div>
  
  
 +
<div style = 'padding-left: 14%; padding-bottom: 10px;font-size: 25px' ><b>Results</b></div>
  
  
 +
<div style='background: #808080; margin: 0px 14% 20px 14%; height:1px;></div>
  
 +
<div style='padding-top: 0px;'></div>
  
 +
<div style = 'padding-right: 14%; padding-left: 14%; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >We successfully cloned and sequenced all 6 pdt variants of University of Maryland’s copper circuit (<a href = "http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2333437" style='text-decoration: underline;'>K2333437</a>-<a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2333442" style='text-decoration: underline;'>K2333442</a>). We confirmed that they are inducible with copper sulfate and that the RFP produced can be degraded by mf-Lon (Figure 2). We then performed preliminary speed characterization of a subset of the parts before sending them back to Maryland (Figure 3). We also analyzed Maryland’s data of our constructs and found that degradation was in fact occurring (Figure 4). Together these results show that not only can our system degrade in different strains and media conditions, but that it can degrade and change the speed of gene expression for arbitrary proteins. While we didn’t get to characterize the modified parts to the extent that we desired, we did see a noticeable and qualitatively similar speed change in our characterization. We hope that with more testing, we’ll be able to make these parts as consistent as our test parts.</div>
  
 +
<div style='padding-top: 15px;'></div>
  
<!-------Methods------>
 
  
 +
<div style = 'padding-right: 14%; padding-left: 14%; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >We would also like to note that due to a judging form mishap, we did not fill in the Silver Medal parts requirement with any BioBrick IDs. However, since these parts serve as both new parts and functional proofs of concept, they would be sufficient to fulfill the Silver Medal requirement, we would humbly ask that judges evaluate these parts (among others), as proof of our fulfillment of Silver Medal requirement I. More information on this can be found on our for <a href='https://2017.igem.org/Team:William_and_Mary/For_Judges' style='text-decoration: underline;'>Judges</a> page, as well as our other part related pages.</div>
 +
<div style='padding-top: 80px;'></div>
  
<div style = 'padding-left: 190px; padding-bottom: 0px;font-size: 25px' ><b>Methods</b></div>
 
  
 +
<div style = 'padding-left: 14%; padding-bottom: 10px;font-size: 20px' ><b>Degradation Functionality</b></div>
  
 
+
<div style='background: #808080; margin: 0px 14% 18px 14%; height:1px;></div>
 
+
<div style='background: #808080; margin: 40px 190px 10px 190px; height:1px;></div>
+
  
 
<div style='padding-top: 0px;'></div>
 
<div style='padding-top: 0px;'></div>
  
 +
<div style = 'padding-right: 14%; padding-left: 14%; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' > Figure 2 shows the results from our plate reader functionality assay.  Cells were grown for 4 hours then induced with either 500µM or 1mM of CuSO<sub>4</sub> (to induce copper sensing parts). After 2 hours cells were induced further with .01mM IPTG (to induce pLac mf-Lon). Introduction of mf-Lon clearly decreased the fluorescence of the cells, and based upon the results from this assay, we decided to perform speed tests on these constructs with 500µM CuSO<sub>4</sub>, and .01mM IPTG </div>
  
<div style = 'padding-left: 190px; padding-bottom: 30px;font-size: 20px' >Transformation</div>
+
<center>
 +
<figure style='padding-left: px;'>
 +
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/b/b3/T--William_and_Mary--Copper_Timecourse.png' width = "60%"/>
 +
<figcaption><div style='padding-left: 20%;padding-right:20%; padding-top: 15px; color: #808080; font-size: 14px;'>Figure 2: Functional plate reader assay of Copper Sensor pdt parts, values are geometric means of the fluorescence/OD600 of three biological replicates, excitation/emission 584/612, shaded region represents one geometric std above and below mean </div>
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
</center>
  
<div style = 'padding-right: 190px; padding-left: 190px; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >We transformed the plasmids (listed below) resuspended from the Distribution Kit into E. coli DH5-alpha cells. Colonies were given 16 hours to grow.</div>
+
<div style='padding-top: 80px;'></div>
  
<div style='padding-top: 30px;'></div>
+
<div style = 'padding-left: 14%; padding-bottom: 10px;font-size: 20px' ><b>Preliminary Speed Tests</b></div>
  
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/94/T--William_and_Mary--construct.jpeg" width="500px"/></center>
+
<div style='background: #808080; margin: 0px 14% 18px 14%; height:1px;></div>
  
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/51/T--William_and_Mary--equation2.jpeg" width="380px"/></center>
+
<div style='padding-top: 0px;'></div>
  
 +
<div style = 'padding-right: 14%; padding-left: 14%; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' > Figure 3 shows the results from our FACS speed tests, which were performed in the same manner as previously <a href="2017.igem.org/Team:William_and_Mary/Speed_Control" style='text-decoration: underline;'>described</a>. We were able to see a significant, but somewhat noisy speed change. While it was clear that parts with increased degradation rate were reaching steady state faster, it was fairly hard to distinguish them from one another. This is likely because we experienced cell death and toxicity issues with higher concentrations of copper sulfate (1mM lead to extreme cell death), and because we were unable to test parameters as thoroughly as we would have liked due to time concerns. Never the less, we feel that this data still shows that our work is generalizable, and usable in circuits under imperfect real-world conditions</div>
  
<div style='background: #808080; margin: 40px 190px 10px 190px; height:1px;></div>
+
<center>
 
+
<figure style='padding-left: px;'>
<div style='padding-top: 10px;'></div>
+
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/da/T--William_and_Mary--Copper_Normalized_V1.png'width = "50%"/>
 
+
<figcaption><div style='padding-left: 20%;padding-right:20%; padding-top: 15px; color: #808080; font-size: 14px;'>Figure 3: Time course assay of Copper Sensor pdt parts, values are steady state normalized geometric means of of three biological replicates taken on the FL3 channel. Shaded region represents one geometric std above and below mean</div></figcaption>
 
+
</figure>
 
+
</center>
<div style = 'padding-left: 190px; padding-bottom: 30px;font-size: 20px' >Calibration</div>
+
 
+
<div style = 'padding-right: 190px; padding-left: 190px; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >Before we started plate reader measurement, we obtained the OD600 reference point and the fluorescein fluorescence curve in the microplate reader to standardize the absorbance reading and cell-based fluorescence reading. Our model was a Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader. Ludox-S40 silica nanoparticles were used to calculate the correction factor of OD600. Black 96-well plates with clear bottoms were used. For the plate reader our excitation and emission setting were 485 nm and 528 nm respectively (Same setting was used for all experiments below).</div>
+
 
+
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 25px;'></div>
+
 
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/51/T--William_and_Mary--equation2.jpeg" width="380px"/></center>
+
<div style='padding-top: 25px;'></div>
+
 
+
<div style = 'padding-right: 190px; padding-left: 190px; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >The dilution curve of fluorescein was performed by carrying out a 11-step, 2-fold serial dilution of green fluorescein. Final scaling level was determined from medium-high points in the dilution that is likely to be less impacted by saturation or pipetting error. The μM Fluorescein/a.u.is defined as mean of mid-high level fluorescein concentration divided by the obtained plate reader reading. </div>
+
 
+
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 25px;'></div>
+
 
+
 
+
<div style='background: #808080; margin: 40px 190px 10px 190px; height:1px;></div>
+
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 10px;'></div>
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
<div style = 'padding-left: 190px; padding-bottom: 30px;font-size: 20px' >Cell Measurement</div>
+
 
+
<div style = 'padding-right: 190px; padding-left: 190px; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >2 colonies of each device was inoculated over night into 5 ml Luria- Bertani medium with 25 μg/mL Chloramphenicol in a 37°C, 220 rpm shaking incubator. Cell cultures were diluted to a target OD600 of 0.02 into same LB medium in 50 mL falcon tube covered with foil before use Diluted cultures were further grown at 37°C and 220 rpm. At 0, 2, 4, and 6 hours of incubation, 500 μL aliquot was taken from each two colonies of the 8 devices and were placed immediately on ice to prevent further growth. At the end of sampling point, 4 replicates 100 μl of each sample was pipetted into a 96-well microplate with the arrangement as below. Data was imported into the <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tC-dW10aiqVDURof4HZY8bNCsF5Hvz-XXzgJwrXNu1I/edit#gid=1645629887" style='text-decoration: underline;'> Excel Sheet for submission.</a></div>
+
  
 
<div style='padding-top: 40px;'></div>
 
<div style='padding-top: 40px;'></div>
  
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b2/T--William_and_Mary--96wells.jpeg" width="600px"/></center>
 
  
<div style='padding-top: 80px;'></div>
+
<div style = 'padding-left: 14%; padding-bottom: 10px;font-size: 20px' ><b>Maryland's Tests</b></div>
  
<!-----Results/Discussion----->
+
<div style='background: #808080; margin: 0px 14% 18px 14%; height:1px;></div>
  
<div style = 'padding-left: 190px; padding-bottom: 0px;font-size: 25px' ><b>Results and Discussion</b></div>
+
<div style='padding-top: 0px;'></div>
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 30px;'></div>
+
 
+
<div style = 'padding-right: 190px; padding-left: 190px; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >Below is the Fluorescein Standard Curve we obtained, from which we can still see the problem of saturation. We also converted the calibrated data of the time-measurement into a uM Fluorescence a.u./ OD600  versus time graph. Besides Device 1 and Device 4, all the others constructs show consistency of standardized fluorescence level in the two colonies over time. </div>
+
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 30px;'></div>
+
 
+
<div class="row">
+
<div class="col-sm-6" style=''><span class="pull-right">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2c/T--William_and_Mary--graph1.jpeg" width="300px"/></span></div>
+
<div class="col-sm-6" style=''>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/15/T--William_and_Mary--graph2.jpeg" width="300px"/></div>
+
 
+
</div>
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 30px;'></div>
+
 
+
 
+
<div style = 'padding-right: 190px; padding-left: 190px; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >From our experiment, we conclude that that BBa_J364100 is a stronger RBS, with an increase of 32.0%, 74.2% and 16.2% expression under J23101, J23106 and J23117 respectively compared to BBa_B0034.</div>
+
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 30px;'></div>
+
 
+
<div style = 'padding-right: 190px; padding-left: 190px; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >The Standardized RBS tested in this experiment, BCD (bicistronic design) 2 is a synthetic cistron leader peptide region that contains two Shine Dalgano sequences that is reported to have increased precise and reliable translation initiation [3]. Device1 and 4, 2 and 5 and Device 3 and 6 features the same strong (J23101), medium (J23106) and weak (J23117) promoters from the well-characterized Anderson promotor family in iGEM registry. Device 1-3 are under standard RBS BBa_B0034, (which William_and_Mary iGEM 2016 has proudly characterized), while Device 4-6 incorporate the test subject BBa_J364100 (BCD2). </div>
+
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 30px;'></div>
+
 
+
<div class="row">
+
<div class="col-sm-6" style=''><span class="pull-right">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/38/T--William_and_Mary--graph3.jpeg" width="450px"/></span></div>
+
<div class="col-sm-6" style=''>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8e/T--William_and_Mary--graph4.jpeg" width="450px"/></div>
+
 
+
</div>
+
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 30px;'></div>
+
 
+
<div style = 'padding-right: 190px; padding-left: 190px; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >Since all of the devices are under constitutive promoters, we assumed that fluorescence expression to be consistent over time in an optimal growth condition (37°C in LB medium). we compiled a total of 48 data of all 4 time points and 2 colonies of the same RBS and did an anova test for BBa_B0034 and BBa_J364100 and obtained a p-value of .085. </div>
+
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 15px;'></div>
+
 
+
 
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/10/T--William_and_Mary--anova.jpeg" width="600px"/></center>
+
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 15px;'></div>
+
 
+
<div style = 'padding-right: 190px; padding-left: 190px; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >The failure of getting a significant difference between groups may be due to a small sample size and limitation of place reader measurement. Since Device 1 and Device 4 accounts for most of the variation, and both of which are under the same promoter, another possible explanation would be the context dependent performance of J23101, and an insulator part may be needed to further investigate property of this RBS if the same problem occurs across different teams [4]. We thank the iGEM Measurement Committee again for providing us an excellent opportunity to be part of this study and look forward to see the study results when data from all participating teams are put together.</div>
+
 
+
<div style='padding-top: 70px;'></div>
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
<!---References----->
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
<div style = 'padding-left: 280px; padding-bottom: 0px;font-size: 25px' ><b>References</b></div>
+
<div style='padding-top: 30px;'></div>
+
 
+
<div style=  'padding-right: 300px; padding-left: 300px; text-indent: px;line-height: 25px;' >
+
 
+
[1] Kwok, R. (2010). Five hard truths for synthetic biology. Nature, 463(7279), 288-290. doi:10.1038/463288a
+
<div style='padding-top: 15px;'></div>
+
 
+
[2] Beal, J., Haddock-Angelli, T., Gershater, M., Mora, K. D., Lizarazo, M., Hollenhorst, J., & Rettberg, R. (2016). Reproducibility of Fluorescent Expression from Engineered Biological Constructs in E. coli. Plos One, 11(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150182
+
<div style='padding-top: 15px;'></div>
+
 
+
 
+
[3] Mutalik, V. K., Guimaraes, J. C., Cambray, G., Lam, C., Christoffersen, M. J., Mai, Q., . . . Endy, D. (2013). Precise and reliable gene expression via standard transcription and translation initiation elements. Nature Methods, 10(4), 354-360. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2404
+
<div style='padding-top: 15px;'></div>
+
 
+
 
+
[4] Davis, J. H., Rubin, A. J., & Sauer, R. T. (2011). Design, construction and characterization of a set of insulated bacterial promoters. Nucleic Acids Research, 39(3), 1131–1141. http://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq810
+
 
+
</div>
+
  
 +
<div style = 'padding-right: 14%; padding-left: 14%; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;' >We also had <a href='https://2017.igem.org/Team:UMaryland' style='text-decoration: underline;'>University of Maryland</a> confirm degradation of our pTet mScarlet-I constructs in their plate reader. They transformed each one of our blinded constructs into a DH5-alpha derivative along with our pLac mf-Lon construct, and then did fluorescence time course measurements of cells in LB in their plate reader. Since their plate reader could only take density measurements at the beginning and end of the time course, we analyzed the relative expression of our constructs (fluorescence/OD700) at the final measurement. When unblinded, we observed that all but one of the pdts that we sent them degraded as expected. The difference in the remaining construct could be due to differences in growth conditions (LB vs. M9 media), plate reader conditions, or growth phase of measurement (Figure 4).</div>
  
 +
<center>
 +
<figure style='padding-left: px;'>
 +
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/e9/T--William_and_Mary--mScarlet-UMD.png' width = "45%"/>
 +
<figcaption><div style='padding-left: 20%;padding-right:20%; padding-top: 15px; color: #808080; font-size: 14px;'>Figure 4: Geometric mean of three biological replicates of each of the tested constructs.</div></figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
</center>
  
<div style='padding-top: 60px;'></div>
 
  
 
</body>
 
</body>

Latest revision as of 03:47, 2 November 2017




Background
This year our team has focused on creating a system that will allow other iGEM teams to easily control the gene expression speed of an arbitrary protein without requiring a costly wholesale redesign of existing architecture. To that end, we characterized how protein degradation tags (pdt) can be used to modularly change the speed of mScarlet-I, a fast folding, high quantum yield red fluorescent protein. We also created a set of easy-cloning parts which enable future iGEM teams to clone our parts without needing intermediates. At the UVA Mid-Atlantic meetup, we were particularly intrigued by University of Maryland iGEM’s copper sensor. After discussing with them, we agreed that we would collaborate on improving the function of their copper sensor (Bba_K2477013). Since they primarily wanted to use their copper sensor as an educational tool, reducing the time required to get results would help them keep students engaged, as well as enable them to use their device in labs or outreach activities that did not have a lot of time.
To help UMD increase their gene expression speed, we proposed that we jointly create and characterize modified versions of their copper sensor parts with pdts (Figure 1). Since time was short and Maryland did not have access to a cell sorter, we simply had them ship us their parts, and then performed the modifications and characterizations at William and Mary, before sending the modified parts back for use. On the other end, William and Mary sent blinded speed constructs to Maryland for testing. We hoped that this would enable us to confirm degradation characterization in platforms other than our own, and potentially show speed change as well.
Figure 1: Schematic of University of Maryland's modified copper sensing part
Results
We successfully cloned and sequenced all 6 pdt variants of University of Maryland’s copper circuit (K2333437-K2333442). We confirmed that they are inducible with copper sulfate and that the RFP produced can be degraded by mf-Lon (Figure 2). We then performed preliminary speed characterization of a subset of the parts before sending them back to Maryland (Figure 3). We also analyzed Maryland’s data of our constructs and found that degradation was in fact occurring (Figure 4). Together these results show that not only can our system degrade in different strains and media conditions, but that it can degrade and change the speed of gene expression for arbitrary proteins. While we didn’t get to characterize the modified parts to the extent that we desired, we did see a noticeable and qualitatively similar speed change in our characterization. We hope that with more testing, we’ll be able to make these parts as consistent as our test parts.
We would also like to note that due to a judging form mishap, we did not fill in the Silver Medal parts requirement with any BioBrick IDs. However, since these parts serve as both new parts and functional proofs of concept, they would be sufficient to fulfill the Silver Medal requirement, we would humbly ask that judges evaluate these parts (among others), as proof of our fulfillment of Silver Medal requirement I. More information on this can be found on our for Judges page, as well as our other part related pages.
Degradation Functionality
Figure 2 shows the results from our plate reader functionality assay. Cells were grown for 4 hours then induced with either 500µM or 1mM of CuSO4 (to induce copper sensing parts). After 2 hours cells were induced further with .01mM IPTG (to induce pLac mf-Lon). Introduction of mf-Lon clearly decreased the fluorescence of the cells, and based upon the results from this assay, we decided to perform speed tests on these constructs with 500µM CuSO4, and .01mM IPTG
Figure 2: Functional plate reader assay of Copper Sensor pdt parts, values are geometric means of the fluorescence/OD600 of three biological replicates, excitation/emission 584/612, shaded region represents one geometric std above and below mean
Preliminary Speed Tests
Figure 3 shows the results from our FACS speed tests, which were performed in the same manner as previously described. We were able to see a significant, but somewhat noisy speed change. While it was clear that parts with increased degradation rate were reaching steady state faster, it was fairly hard to distinguish them from one another. This is likely because we experienced cell death and toxicity issues with higher concentrations of copper sulfate (1mM lead to extreme cell death), and because we were unable to test parameters as thoroughly as we would have liked due to time concerns. Never the less, we feel that this data still shows that our work is generalizable, and usable in circuits under imperfect real-world conditions
Figure 3: Time course assay of Copper Sensor pdt parts, values are steady state normalized geometric means of of three biological replicates taken on the FL3 channel. Shaded region represents one geometric std above and below mean
Maryland's Tests
We also had University of Maryland confirm degradation of our pTet mScarlet-I constructs in their plate reader. They transformed each one of our blinded constructs into a DH5-alpha derivative along with our pLac mf-Lon construct, and then did fluorescence time course measurements of cells in LB in their plate reader. Since their plate reader could only take density measurements at the beginning and end of the time course, we analyzed the relative expression of our constructs (fluorescence/OD700) at the final measurement. When unblinded, we observed that all but one of the pdts that we sent them degraded as expected. The difference in the remaining construct could be due to differences in growth conditions (LB vs. M9 media), plate reader conditions, or growth phase of measurement (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Geometric mean of three biological replicates of each of the tested constructs.