Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Hardware setup"

 
(37 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
margin-left : 5% !important;
 
margin-left : 5% !important;
 
}
 
}
 
+
#scaterringabso {
 +
width : 40%;
 +
margin-left : 30%;
 +
}
  
 
</style>
 
</style>
Line 72: Line 75:
 
<div class=textbody>
 
<div class=textbody>
 
<div class=text2left>
 
<div class=text2left>
<h2> Gel Choice </h2> <br> <br>
+
<h1> Gel & Laser Choice </h1> <br> <br>
 
The optical properties of a gel depends on the gel type, its concentration and the nutrient source. <br>
 
The optical properties of a gel depends on the gel type, its concentration and the nutrient source. <br>
 
In addition, the profile of a laser beam in the gel depends on the laser wavelength, beam diameter and intensity. <br> <br>
 
In addition, the profile of a laser beam in the gel depends on the laser wavelength, beam diameter and intensity. <br> <br>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a0/Lases_Sketch.png"> <span> Characteristics of the lasers used in this study </span></div>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a0/Lases_Sketch.png"> <br><span> Characteristics of the lasers used in this study </span></div>
  
  
Line 124: Line 127:
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
+
<div class=text2>
 +
<div class=text2left> </div>
 +
<div class=text2right><h1> Gel type, concentration & nutrient source</h1></div></div>
 
<div class=text2>  
 
<div class=text2>  
 
<div class=text2left>
 
<div class=text2left>
 
<img class=matlabfig  src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/26/Absorbance_change_with_gel_type_and_concentration.png"></div>
 
<img class=matlabfig  src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/26/Absorbance_change_with_gel_type_and_concentration.png"></div>
 
<div class=text2right>
 
<div class=text2right>
The optical properties of a gel depend on the gel type, its concentration and the nutrient source. <br> <br>
+
 
It is best to use a low gel concentration to reduce absorbance. Conveniently some gels have a higher melting point than solidifying point. This hysteresis phenomenon means that the gel concentration can be lowered and still be kept at in a solid state at 37C by pre-cooling them (to 6-8C) prior to warm incubation.<br><br>
+
It is best to use a low gel concentration to reduce absorbance. Conveniently some gels have a higher melting point than solidifying point. This hysteresis phenomenon means that the gel concentration can be lowered and still be kept at in a solid state at 37<sup>o</sup>C by pre-cooling them (to 6-8<sup>o</sup>C) prior to warm incubation.<br><br>
 
<img class resize src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/4f/Gel_Hysteresis2.PNG" width="pixels">
 
<img class resize src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/4f/Gel_Hysteresis2.PNG" width="pixels">
 +
<br> <span> Gels Melt at a Lower Temperature Than They Melt (L: liquid, T: transition, S: solid </span>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 139: Line 145:
  
 
<div class=text2>
 
<div class=text2>
<div class=text2left></div>
+
<div class=text2left>Alginate gelling is induced by calcium ions which crosslink gelling polymers at room temperature. To get a homogenous gel, calcium ions cannot be mixed with an Alginate solution but must diffuse from an underlying calcium source. Since the optical properties of Alginate depend on the amount of crosslinking, they ultimately depend on calcium diffusion which is a difficult parameter to control. It is important to note that keeping the same diffusion conditions (time, temperature, calcium source concentration etc.) is necessary to maintain identical alginate optical properties between experiments. In addition to the gelling agent, the nutrient source also impacts light absorbance. Conveniently, LB shows less absorbance than M9 media at most visible wavelengths and was therefore added to our gels for our study.</div>
 +
 
 +
<div class=text2right><img class=matlabfig src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8e/Cross_linked_and_uncross_linked_alginate.png">
  
<div class=text2right>
 
Alginate gelling is induced by calcium ions which crosslink gelling polymers at room temperature. To get a homogenous gel, calcium ions cannot be mixed with an Alginate solution but must diffuse from an underlying calcium source (1). Since the optical properties of Alginate depend on the amount of crosslinking, they ultimately depend on calcium diffusion which is a difficult parameter to control. It is important to note that keeping the same diffusion conditions (time, temperature, calcium source concentration etc.) is necessary to maintain identical alginate optical properties between experiments. In addition to the gelling agent, the nutrient source also impacts light absorbance. Conveniently, LB shows less absorbance than M9 media at most visible wavelengths and was therefore added to our gels for our study.
 
 
   
 
   
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
<div class=text2>
 +
<div class=text2left> <h1> Data Acquisition Stratgy </h1></div>
 +
<div class=text2right> </div></div>
 
<div class=text2>
 
<div class=text2>
<div class=text2left> We initially attempted to extract the intensity landscape in the gel from a simple picture. The strong diffusion of light from the main laser beam observed  on these pictures suggested that an important scattering was occurring in the gel. <br>
+
<div class=text2left>  
 +
We initially attempted to extract the intensity landscape in the gel from a simple picture. The strong diffusion of light from the main laser beam observed  on these pictures suggested that an important scattering was occurring in the gel. <br> <br>
  
   Since the scattering observed on gel pictures was questioning the viability of Medusa, we further studied the light landscape with a different strategy. Briefly, we captured  the light diffusion at various gels positions on the X-axis (X-axis represents gel depth) by scanning the light intensity along the Z-direction of the gel. </div>
+
   Since the scattering observed on gel pictures was questioning the viability of Medusa, we further studied the light landscape with a different strategy. Briefly, we captured  the light diffusion at various gels positions on the X-axis (X-axis represents gel depth) by scanning the light intensity along the Z-direction of the gel.
 +
<img class=matlabfig src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fb/Acquisition_Strategy.png">
 +
<br>
 +
<span>Data Acquisition Strategy Used in this Study</span>
 +
</div>
  
 
<div class=text2right><img class=matlabfig src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/cd/WebcamSkecth.png">
 
<div class=text2right><img class=matlabfig src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/cd/WebcamSkecth.png">
<img class=matlabfig src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fb/Acquisition_Strategy.png"></div>
+
<br>
 +
<span>Initial Data Acquisition Strategy </span>
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
<img class=matlabfig src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/57/Image_processing.png">
 +
<br>
 +
<span>Gel Images With Light Halo</span>
  
 
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
+
</div>
 +
<div class=text2>
 +
<div class=text2left> </div>
 +
<div class=text2right><h1> Data Fitting and Interpretation </h1> </div></div>
 
<div class=text2>
 
<div class=text2>
  
<div class=text2left> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/bb/Scattering_Absorbance_Sketch.png">
+
<div class=text2left>  
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2c/Width_plot2.png"></div>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2c/Width_plot2.png">
 +
<span> In The Gel The Beam Diameter Is Close to Its  Original Value (black) </span> </br> </div>
  
 
<div id="Fitting_Interpretation" class=text2right>  
 
<div id="Fitting_Interpretation" class=text2right>  
<h3> Data Fitting and Interpretation </h3>
+
<img id=scaterringabso src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/bb/Scattering_Absorbance_Sketch.png"> <br>
The laser is affected within the gel by scattering because photons are redirected after colliding with gel particles. Scattering causes the laser to diffuse and creates a light halo surrounding the main beam.  We found that the intensity of this light halo described a normal distribution on the Z-axis which we fitted a Gaussian equation (See table). The spread of this distribution represents the diameter of the laser beam. In contrast to what the gel pictures suggested, the laser diameter within the gel was actually close to its initial diameter, prior to entering the gel. The large light diffusion observed on gel pictures was probably caused by internal camera corrections which automatically balanced areas of high and low light intensity.  In contrast, the low scattering that we recorded manually is very encouraging as it shows that a high targeting precision can be obtained within a gel which will give a high resolution to Medusa control. <br>
+
The laser is affected within the gel by scattering because photons are redirected after colliding with gel particles.<br> In addition, scattering causes the laser to diffuse and creates a light halo surrounding the main beam.  We found that the intensity of this light halo described a normal distribution on the Z-axis which we fitted a Gaussian equation (See table 2). The spread of this distribution represents the diameter of the laser beam.<br>
 +
In contrast to what the gel pictures suggested, the laser diameter within the gel was actually close to its initial diameter, prior to entering the gel. The large light diffusion observed on gel pictures was probably caused by internal camera corrections which automatically balanced areas of high and low light intensity.  In fact, the low scattering that we recorded manually is very encouraging as it shows that a high targeting precision can be obtained within a gel which will give a high resolution to Medusa control.  
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 223: Line 248:
  
 
</table>
 
</table>
<span> Table2: </span>
+
<br>
 +
<span> Table 2: Scattering and Absorbance Profiles and Fits </span>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 
<div class=text2>
 
<div class=text2>
 
<div class=text2left> In addition, to scattering, the laser beam is also affected by absorbance when photons energy is absorbed by gel particles and converted into heat. As expected, absorbance caused the laser intensity to followed a logarithmic decay. We modeled this trend by rearranging Beer-Lambert’s law with the equation defining absorbance: <br>
 
<div class=text2left> In addition, to scattering, the laser beam is also affected by absorbance when photons energy is absorbed by gel particles and converted into heat. As expected, absorbance caused the laser intensity to followed a logarithmic decay. We modeled this trend by rearranging Beer-Lambert’s law with the equation defining absorbance: <br>
<p> A(x)= εCx </p> and  <p> A=Log(I<sub>0</sub>/I)  (See parameters in Table I) </p>
+
<p> A(x)= εCx </p> and  <p> A=Log(I<sub>0</sub>/I)  (See parameters in Table 2) </p> <br><br>
 
In contrast to scattering, the absorbance was high inducing a rapid loss of intensity in the gels. In all gels, the blue laser was more adsorbed than the red. For example, the red laser could reach almost 19.4mm before losing half its initial intensity in Alginate while the blue laser only reached 6.8mm in the same medium. In addition, Agar was the worst performing gel. For example, the blue laser lost half its initial intensity at an Agar depth of only 3.2mm. The absorbance being high, it is necessary to adapt the laser intensity to the gel depth targeted to obtain the right intensity at this depth which will activate the bacteria without bleaching their photoreceptors. </div>
 
In contrast to scattering, the absorbance was high inducing a rapid loss of intensity in the gels. In all gels, the blue laser was more adsorbed than the red. For example, the red laser could reach almost 19.4mm before losing half its initial intensity in Alginate while the blue laser only reached 6.8mm in the same medium. In addition, Agar was the worst performing gel. For example, the blue laser lost half its initial intensity at an Agar depth of only 3.2mm. The absorbance being high, it is necessary to adapt the laser intensity to the gel depth targeted to obtain the right intensity at this depth which will activate the bacteria without bleaching their photoreceptors. </div>
  
<div class=text2right><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a4/05absbarplot.png"></div>
+
<div class=text2right><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a4/05absbarplot.png">
 +
<span>Distance At Which The Laser Looses Half Its Initial Intensity</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
  
 
<div class=text2>
 
<div class=text2>
<div class=text2left>We can extrapolate from the scattering and absorbance fits a light intensity landscape for each gel. This data can be used to predict the light intensity within the direct path and around the laser beam in all positions of the gel volume. <br> The data and fitting parameters for all gel tested are available in our summarizing PDF documents:  
+
<div class=text2left>We can extrapolate from the scattering and absorbance fits a light intensity landscape for each gel. This data can be used to predict the light intensity within the direct path and around the laser beam in all positions of the gel volume.
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/bb/Landscape_Red.png">
 +
<span>Red Laser Profile In 1% Agar</span>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class=text2right>
 +
 
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/86/Profile_and_Data_AGR1_Red.png">
 +
<span>Red Laser Profile In 1% Agar</span>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
<div class=text6>
 +
 +
<b>The data and fitting parameters for all gel tested are available in our summarizing PDF documents:</b> <br> <br>
  
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
Line 245: Line 285:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
+
<div class=text2>
</div>
+
<div class=text2left><h1>Data validation</h1> </div>
 +
<div class=text2right></div></div>
  
 
  <div class=text2>
 
  <div class=text2>
<div class=text2right>
+
<div class=text2left>
<h2>Data validation</h2> <br>
+
<br><br>
Although our light intensity recording strategy was simple, we confirmed the accuracy of our data by comparing the absorbance predicted by our fit at a gel depth of 10mm to the absorbance reading obtained with a cuvette of 10mm path length. We found that the absorbance predicted by our fits matched remarkably well the spectrophotometer absorbance measures for all gels but Alginate R<sup>2</sup>=0.77 with Alginate,R<sup>2</sup>=0.94 without Alginate) . This is probably because of the shape difference between a cuvette the gel mold used in our laser study. The different shapes allowed for different calcium ion diffusion rate which impacted the degree of Alginate crosslinking and, ultimately, its absorbance.<br><br>
+
Although our light intensity recording strategy was simple, we confirmed the accuracy of our data by comparing the absorbance predicted by our fit at a gel depth of 10mm to the absorbance reading obtained with a cuvette of 10mm path length. We found that the absorbance predicted by our fits matched remarkably well the spectrophotometer absorbance measures for all gels but Alginate (R<sup>2</sup>=0.77 with Alginate,R<sup>2</sup>=0.94 without Alginate) . This is probably because of the shape difference between a cuvette the gel mold used in our laser study. The different shapes allowed for different calcium ion diffusion rate which impacted the degree of Alginate crosslinking and, ultimately, its absorbance.<br><br>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
   
 
   
Line 257: Line 298:
 
<div class=text2right>
 
<div class=text2right>
 
<img class=matlabfig src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/d4/Abs_fit.png">
 
<img class=matlabfig src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/d4/Abs_fit.png">
<img class=matlabfig src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8e/Cross_linked_and_uncross_linked_alginate.png">
+
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 
<div class=text2>
 
<div class=text2>
<div class=text2right><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/28/Resin_Mass.png"></div>
+
<div class=text2right>In addition, to the absorbance, we seeked to demonstrate that our prediction of the laser diameter at a given gel depth was also accurate. To do so, we exposed the high resolution light curing resin S-Pro (kindly provided by our industrial sponsor Spot-A Materials) to our laser after passing through a range of gel thicknesses or a range of optical filters of equivalent absorbance . S-pro is a 3D printing resin which cures at our blue laser’s wavelength. We measured the diameter of the resin particles solidified after 1 minute exposure to the blue laser. This gave us a proxy of the laser beam diameter after its path through the gel. Here again, we found that the diameter of the particle solidified (ranging from 2.6 to 1.9mm) was in excellent agreement with the diameter of light the diffusion predicted by our model (diameter 2.0mm). <br><br>
<div class=text2left>
+
In addition, to the absorbance, we seeked to demonstrate that our prediction of the laser diameter at a given gel depth was also accurate. To do so, we exposed the high resolution light curing resin S-Pro (kindly provided by our industrial sponsor Spot-A Materials) to our laser after passing through a range of gel thicknesses or a range of optical filters of equivalent absorbance . S-pro is a 3D printing resin which cures at our blue laser’s wavelength. We measured the diameter of the resin particles solidified after 1 minute exposure to the blue laser. This gave us a proxy of the laser beam diameter after its path through the gel. Here again, we found that the diameter of the particle solidified (ranging from 2.6 to 1.9mm) was in excellent agreement with the diameter of light the diffusion predicted by our model (diameter 2.0mm). <br><br>
+
  
Altogether, our results show that, despite its simplicity, our data acquisition and fitting strategy could accurately quantify absorption and scattering within our gels.  
+
Altogether, our results show that, despite its simplicity, our data acquisition and fitting strategy could accurately quantify absorption and scattering within our gels. </div>
</div>
+
<div class=text2left><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/28/Resin_Mass.png"></div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
<div class=text2>
 
<div class=text2left>
 
<h2> Model prediction and 3D Beam modelling. </h2> <br><br>
 
Since the absorbances of the different gels predicted by our model were accurate, we tested whether we could predict the intensity landscape of 0.5% Gelrite based on a simple absorbance reading. <br> <br>
 
The absorbance readings were used to find parameter ‘ε<sub>*</sub>C’ (mm<sup>-1</sup>) which governs the logarithmic decrease of the laser. Concerning the prediction of the laser diffusion, we assumed the light scattering in 0.5% Gelrite to be the same as in 1% Gelrite. This is an oversimplification but predicting the scattering of a gel based on its concentration would make it necessary to acquire light diffusion data for a range of gel concentrations which was outside the scope of our model development. <br><br>
 
We observed that our predicted light profiles were close to the one fitted to the intensity data recorded for 0.5% Gelrite.  We also noticed that the predicted profiles showed slightly less light extinction than recorded. This could be due to the fact that more scattering is occurring along greater gel lengths,  which is not captured in a 10mm wide optical cuvette.
 
</div>
 
  
 +
<div class=text6> <h1>Conclusions</h1> <br><br>
 +
We have developed a simple yet powerful way of measuring and fitting the light profile of a laser in a gel. Our data, which accuracy was confirmed, show that little light scattering can be obtained. The high absorbance limited the outreach of the laser beam but this can be corrected by using a stronger laser or a lower gel concentrations to reach a depth greater than 10cm. <br> <br>
  
<div><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c7/Predict_Data_GLR05.png"></div>
+
Together, these results confirm the feasibility of achieving a high targeting resolution at significant length  within the gel medium.
<span> Fig: </span>
+
 
+
</div>
+
 
+
<div class=text2>
+
<div class=text2left>
+
 
+
Finally, to predict and visualize the volume of gel in which the immobilized bacteria would be activated, we modelled the 3D shapes of the laser in the different gels. We assumed that bacteria would be sharply activated in an ON/OFF manner when light reached an intensity threshold equal to 80% the intensity used in their optogenetic work of Fernandez-Rodriguez et al. This allowed us to predict the volume activated by our two intersecting laser at any point within the three gel characterized.
+
 
+
</div>
+
</div>
+
 
+
<div class=text3>
+
 
+
<div class=text3left style="width:50%">
+
  <div class="container">
+
  <video loop id="glass" width="1376" height="720" autoplay>
+
      <source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/97/PBGraphPaul2.mp4" type="video/mp4">
+
    </video>
+
  </div>
+
  </div>
+
 
+
<div class=text3center>
+
  <div class="container">
+
    <video loop id="glass" width="1376" height="720" autoplay>
+
        <source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/51/PBGraphPaul4.mp4" type="video/mp4">
+
    </video>
+
  </div>
+
</div>
+
 
+
<div class=text3right>
+
  <div class="container">
+
    <video  loop id="glass" width="1376" height="720" autoplay>
+
        <source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/83/PBGraphPaul3.mp4" type="video/mp4">
+
    </video>
+
  </div>
+
</div>
+
  
  

Latest revision as of 17:32, 12 December 2017

GEL OPTICS
Medusa aims at optically controlling bacteria immobilized in a gel with two intersecting lasers. Two questions are important to address to achieve this goal:

  • How far can a laser go in a gel?
  • What resolution can the laser achieve?

In this page, we present our study on the optical properties of three commonly used culture gels. We develop a simple strategy to record and model the light profiles of our lasers and show that a clean light signal can be obtained at significant gel depths (>10cm).

Gel & Laser Choice



The optical properties of a gel depends on the gel type, its concentration and the nutrient source.
In addition, the profile of a laser beam in the gel depends on the laser wavelength, beam diameter and intensity.


Characteristics of the lasers used in this study
Alginate Agar Gelrite
Key advantage Solidifies at room temperature
by adding calcium ion
Most ubiquitous microbiology gel Low absorbance
Recommended concentration 1.75-4% 1-1.5% 0.15-0.25%
Melting-Gelling Point NA 0.5%: 85-20C
1%: 90-35C
0.5%: 65-15
1%: 100-35C
Key disadvantage Properties depend on calcium ion diffusion
which is hard to control
High absorbance Melts less well than agar
Concentration studied 1% with LB 1% with LB 1% & 0.5% with LB
Table 1: Gel Included in this Study

Gel type, concentration & nutrient source

It is best to use a low gel concentration to reduce absorbance. Conveniently some gels have a higher melting point than solidifying point. This hysteresis phenomenon means that the gel concentration can be lowered and still be kept at in a solid state at 37oC by pre-cooling them (to 6-8oC) prior to warm incubation.


Gels Melt at a Lower Temperature Than They Melt (L: liquid, T: transition, S: solid
Alginate gelling is induced by calcium ions which crosslink gelling polymers at room temperature. To get a homogenous gel, calcium ions cannot be mixed with an Alginate solution but must diffuse from an underlying calcium source. Since the optical properties of Alginate depend on the amount of crosslinking, they ultimately depend on calcium diffusion which is a difficult parameter to control. It is important to note that keeping the same diffusion conditions (time, temperature, calcium source concentration etc.) is necessary to maintain identical alginate optical properties between experiments. In addition to the gelling agent, the nutrient source also impacts light absorbance. Conveniently, LB shows less absorbance than M9 media at most visible wavelengths and was therefore added to our gels for our study.

Data Acquisition Stratgy

We initially attempted to extract the intensity landscape in the gel from a simple picture. The strong diffusion of light from the main laser beam observed on these pictures suggested that an important scattering was occurring in the gel.

Since the scattering observed on gel pictures was questioning the viability of Medusa, we further studied the light landscape with a different strategy. Briefly, we captured the light diffusion at various gels positions on the X-axis (X-axis represents gel depth) by scanning the light intensity along the Z-direction of the gel.
Data Acquisition Strategy Used in this Study

Initial Data Acquisition Strategy

Gel Images With Light Halo

Data Fitting and Interpretation

In The Gel The Beam Diameter Is Close to Its Original Value (black)

The laser is affected within the gel by scattering because photons are redirected after colliding with gel particles.
In addition, scattering causes the laser to diffuse and creates a light halo surrounding the main beam. We found that the intensity of this light halo described a normal distribution on the Z-axis which we fitted a Gaussian equation (See table 2). The spread of this distribution represents the diameter of the laser beam.
In contrast to what the gel pictures suggested, the laser diameter within the gel was actually close to its initial diameter, prior to entering the gel. The large light diffusion observed on gel pictures was probably caused by internal camera corrections which automatically balanced areas of high and low light intensity. In fact, the low scattering that we recorded manually is very encouraging as it shows that a high targeting precision can be obtained within a gel which will give a high resolution to Medusa control.
Absorption Scattering
Profile
Trend Logarithmic decay Normal distribution
Axis of Occurrence X-axis Z-axis
Equation Fit I(x)=I0*10*C*x I(z)=Imax*e((z-z0)2/s))
Parameters
  • I0: laser intensity before entering the gel
  • ε: extinction coefficient (mm-1.%-1)
  • C: concentration of the absorptive medium (%)
  • x: depth in gel (mm)
  • Imax: intensity maxima of diffusion halo in the path of the laser (W.m-2)
  • z0: laser beam position (zero on Z-axis, mm)
  • S: controls the spread of the distribution (mm)

Table 2: Scattering and Absorbance Profiles and Fits
In addition, to scattering, the laser beam is also affected by absorbance when photons energy is absorbed by gel particles and converted into heat. As expected, absorbance caused the laser intensity to followed a logarithmic decay. We modeled this trend by rearranging Beer-Lambert’s law with the equation defining absorbance:

A(x)= εCx

and

A=Log(I0/I) (See parameters in Table 2)



In contrast to scattering, the absorbance was high inducing a rapid loss of intensity in the gels. In all gels, the blue laser was more adsorbed than the red. For example, the red laser could reach almost 19.4mm before losing half its initial intensity in Alginate while the blue laser only reached 6.8mm in the same medium. In addition, Agar was the worst performing gel. For example, the blue laser lost half its initial intensity at an Agar depth of only 3.2mm. The absorbance being high, it is necessary to adapt the laser intensity to the gel depth targeted to obtain the right intensity at this depth which will activate the bacteria without bleaching their photoreceptors.
Distance At Which The Laser Looses Half Its Initial Intensity
We can extrapolate from the scattering and absorbance fits a light intensity landscape for each gel. This data can be used to predict the light intensity within the direct path and around the laser beam in all positions of the gel volume. Red Laser Profile In 1% Agar
Red Laser Profile In 1% Agar
The data and fitting parameters for all gel tested are available in our summarizing PDF documents:

Data validation



Although our light intensity recording strategy was simple, we confirmed the accuracy of our data by comparing the absorbance predicted by our fit at a gel depth of 10mm to the absorbance reading obtained with a cuvette of 10mm path length. We found that the absorbance predicted by our fits matched remarkably well the spectrophotometer absorbance measures for all gels but Alginate (R2=0.77 with Alginate,R2=0.94 without Alginate) . This is probably because of the shape difference between a cuvette the gel mold used in our laser study. The different shapes allowed for different calcium ion diffusion rate which impacted the degree of Alginate crosslinking and, ultimately, its absorbance.

In addition, to the absorbance, we seeked to demonstrate that our prediction of the laser diameter at a given gel depth was also accurate. To do so, we exposed the high resolution light curing resin S-Pro (kindly provided by our industrial sponsor Spot-A Materials) to our laser after passing through a range of gel thicknesses or a range of optical filters of equivalent absorbance . S-pro is a 3D printing resin which cures at our blue laser’s wavelength. We measured the diameter of the resin particles solidified after 1 minute exposure to the blue laser. This gave us a proxy of the laser beam diameter after its path through the gel. Here again, we found that the diameter of the particle solidified (ranging from 2.6 to 1.9mm) was in excellent agreement with the diameter of light the diffusion predicted by our model (diameter 2.0mm).

Altogether, our results show that, despite its simplicity, our data acquisition and fitting strategy could accurately quantify absorption and scattering within our gels.

Conclusions



We have developed a simple yet powerful way of measuring and fitting the light profile of a laser in a gel. Our data, which accuracy was confirmed, show that little light scattering can be obtained. The high absorbance limited the outreach of the laser beam but this can be corrected by using a stronger laser or a lower gel concentrations to reach a depth greater than 10cm.

Together, these results confirm the feasibility of achieving a high targeting resolution at significant length within the gel medium.


Centre for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI)
Faculty of Medicine Cochin Port-Royal, South wing, 2nd floor
Paris Descartes University
24, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques
75014 Paris, France
bettencourt.igem2017@gmail.com