Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<p>All genetic constructs and plasmids have been created using the RFC10 <a target="_blank" href ="http://parts.igem.org/Help:Standards/Assembly/RFC10">RFC10</a> and/or <a target="_blank" href ="http://parts.igem.org/Assembly_standard_25">RFC25</a>cloning standard. Enzymes used were obtained from New England BioLabs©. Cloning procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer`s protocols. </p> | <p>All genetic constructs and plasmids have been created using the RFC10 <a target="_blank" href ="http://parts.igem.org/Help:Standards/Assembly/RFC10">RFC10</a> and/or <a target="_blank" href ="http://parts.igem.org/Assembly_standard_25">RFC25</a>cloning standard. Enzymes used were obtained from New England BioLabs©. Cloning procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer`s protocols. </p> | ||
<p>For submission of our parts to the registry, all Biobricks were cloned into the pSB1C3 backbone. The created genetic constructs were verified by sequencing (Eurofins or GATC sequencing services). All designed plasmids were stored in <i>Escherichia coli</i> DH10β (see <a target="_blank" href ="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Experiments">Experiments and Protocols</a> for details). In this project, we used integrative single-copy B. subtilis specific vectors that stably integrate into the genome at designated loci.[3]</p> | <p>For submission of our parts to the registry, all Biobricks were cloned into the pSB1C3 backbone. The created genetic constructs were verified by sequencing (Eurofins or GATC sequencing services). All designed plasmids were stored in <i>Escherichia coli</i> DH10β (see <a target="_blank" href ="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Experiments">Experiments and Protocols</a> for details). In this project, we used integrative single-copy B. subtilis specific vectors that stably integrate into the genome at designated loci.[3]</p> | ||
− | + | <hr> | |
<h3><b>Biosensor Characterization</b></h3> | <h3><b>Biosensor Characterization</b></h3> | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Furthermore, we analyzed the impact of deleting the <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> gene <i>penP</i> - encoding a beta-lactamase (which has not been studied intensively yet) - on the luminescence output. The strain W168 <i>penP::kan<sup>R</sup></i>was created via Long-Flanking Homology PCR (see <a target="_blank" href ="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Experiments">Experiments and Protocols</a> for details). We also investigated, if the different beta-lactam antibiotics induce the promoter driving PenP.</p> | Furthermore, we analyzed the impact of deleting the <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> gene <i>penP</i> - encoding a beta-lactamase (which has not been studied intensively yet) - on the luminescence output. The strain W168 <i>penP::kan<sup>R</sup></i>was created via Long-Flanking Homology PCR (see <a target="_blank" href ="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Experiments">Experiments and Protocols</a> for details). We also investigated, if the different beta-lactam antibiotics induce the promoter driving PenP.</p> | ||
− | + | <hr> | |
<h3><b>Encapsulation into Peptidosomes</b></h3> | <h3><b>Encapsulation into Peptidosomes</b></h3> | ||
<p>Finally, we could demonstrate a fully functional biosensor encapsulated in Peptidosomes. For this we used the strain showing the strongest response, broadest detection range and the highest viability when tested with different beta-lactams. Peptidosomes containing the biosensor, were exposed to different beta-lactams and development of the luminescence signal was obtain every hour over a time period of 5 hours.</p> | <p>Finally, we could demonstrate a fully functional biosensor encapsulated in Peptidosomes. For this we used the strain showing the strongest response, broadest detection range and the highest viability when tested with different beta-lactams. Peptidosomes containing the biosensor, were exposed to different beta-lactams and development of the luminescence signal was obtain every hour over a time period of 5 hours.</p> |
Revision as of 16:07, 28 October 2017