LukasPlatz (Talk | contribs) |
LukasPlatz (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
− | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/1d/T--Heidelberg--CytochromeCRMA.png|Figure 2:|3D structure of the cytochrome c derived from <i>Rhodotermus marinus</i> | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/1d/T--Heidelberg--CytochromeCRMA.png|Figure 2:|3D structure of the cytochrome c derived from <i>Rhodotermus marinus</i> (PDB) that is used as the catalytic unit in the production of organosilicon. Depicted as yellow sticks is the heme prosthetic group of the electron carrier protein. The protein part of the cytochrome c is illustrated as orange ribbon structure.|}} |
As a proof-of-principle, we wanted to show and harness the potential of organosilicon-forming proteins. | As a proof-of-principle, we wanted to show and harness the potential of organosilicon-forming proteins. | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
{{Heidelberg/templateus/Contentsection|{{#tag:html| | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Contentsection|{{#tag:html| | ||
− | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/40/T--Heidelberg--PlateAssay.png|Figure 3:| | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/4/40/T--Heidelberg--PlateAssay.png|Figure 3:|The riboswitch binding assay in a 96 well plate immediately after substrate addition. Rows show biological triplicates (n=3) and riboswitch activators are compound (3) <i>ethyl 2-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)propanoate</i> and compound (1) <i>dimethyl(phenyl)silane</i>.|}} |
The purified construct was retransformed into DH10beta and incubated at 37°C overnight. To carry out the assay in biological triplicates, three clones were picked and inoculated separately overnight in 5ml LB including chloramphenicol. | The purified construct was retransformed into DH10beta and incubated at 37°C overnight. To carry out the assay in biological triplicates, three clones were picked and inoculated separately overnight in 5ml LB including chloramphenicol. | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
Figure 1.1 shows the <i>ethyl 2-((4-aminophenyl)dimethylsilyl)propanoate</i> product with a retention time corresponding to 11.7 minutes. The silicon educt <i>4-(dimethylsilyl)aniline</i> that emerges at 6.9 minutes implies that there is no complete conversion, possibly due to enzyme inactivity or an unfavorable reaction. Indeed, the conversion rate is 47.5%, which differs from the literature value of 70%<x-ref>Kan.2016</x-ref>. Nonetheless, the amount of the product formed was sufficient for all further experiments. | Figure 1.1 shows the <i>ethyl 2-((4-aminophenyl)dimethylsilyl)propanoate</i> product with a retention time corresponding to 11.7 minutes. The silicon educt <i>4-(dimethylsilyl)aniline</i> that emerges at 6.9 minutes implies that there is no complete conversion, possibly due to enzyme inactivity or an unfavorable reaction. Indeed, the conversion rate is 47.5%, which differs from the literature value of 70%<x-ref>Kan.2016</x-ref>. Nonetheless, the amount of the product formed was sufficient for all further experiments. | ||
− | The unconverted diazo educt ethyl 2-diazo propanoate corresponds to the retention time peaks at 7.2 and 7.4 minutes. The small peak at 10.8 minutes is likely a side product of the reaction. | + | The unconverted diazo educt <i>ethyl 2-diazo propanoate corresponds</i> to the retention time peaks at 7.2 and 7.4 minutes. The small peak at 10.8 minutes is likely a side product of the reaction. |
The successful product synthesis was further confirmed by mass spectrometry. Fig. 1.2 shows the mass spectrum of the breakdown of the product and its correct mass of 251 Dalton. | The successful product synthesis was further confirmed by mass spectrometry. Fig. 1.2 shows the mass spectrum of the breakdown of the product and its correct mass of 251 Dalton. | ||
− | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/92/T--Heidelberg--GCAnilineCompound.png|Figure 4:|Gas | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/92/T--Heidelberg--GCAnilineCompound.png|Figure 4:|Gas chromatogram for the reaction of educt (1) and (5) to the product (3). 11.7 minutes retention time, indicates product formation. Unconverted educts converge 6.9 and 7.2, 7.4 minutes|pos = left}} |
− | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/16/T--Heidelberg--MSAnilineCompound.png|Figure 5:|Mass | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/16/T--Heidelberg--MSAnilineCompound.png|Figure 5:|Mass chromatogram shows the breakdown of the product (3) <i>ethyl 2-((4-aminophenyl)dimethylsilyl)propanoate</i>. The product itself corresponds to a mass of 251 dalton|pos = right}} |
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Heidelberg/templateus/Contentsection|{{#tag:html| | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Contentsection|{{#tag:html| | ||
− | The GC-MS analysis of the organosilicon ethyl 2-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)propanoate is demonstrated in Fig. 2. Hereby, Fig. 2.1 shows the complete conversion of the silicon educt dimethyl(phenyl)silane. The product emerges at a retention time of 9.2 minutes. With >99% conversion rate the product was obtained in high quantity. As described before, the MS analysis verified the product and its correct mass of 236 Dalton (Fig. 2.2). | + | The GC-MS analysis of the organosilicon <i>ethyl 2-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)propanoate</i> is demonstrated in Fig. 2. Hereby, Fig. 2.1 shows the complete conversion of the silicon educt dimethyl(phenyl)silane. The product emerges at a retention time of 9.2 minutes. With >99% conversion rate the product was obtained in high quantity. As described before, the MS analysis verified the product and its correct mass of 236 Dalton (Fig. 2.2). |
− | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ef/T--Heidelberg--GCNonAninlineCompound.png|Figure 6:|Gas | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ef/T--Heidelberg--GCNonAninlineCompound.png|Figure 6:|Gas chromatogram for the reaction of educt (2) and (5) to the product (4). 9.2 minutes retention time, indicates product formation.|pos = left}} |
− | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2b/T--Heidelberg--MSNonAnilineCompound.png|Figure 7:|Mass | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2b/T--Heidelberg--MSNonAnilineCompound.png|Figure 7:|Mass chromatogram shows the breakdown of the product (4) <i>ethyl 2-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)propanoate</i>. The product itself corresponds to a mass of 236 dalton|pos = right}} |
The reaction without the enzyme present served as negative control and is depicted in Fig. 3. As expected, only the two educts emerged after their respective retention time and no product was obtained. | The reaction without the enzyme present served as negative control and is depicted in Fig. 3. As expected, only the two educts emerged after their respective retention time and no product was obtained. | ||
− | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/12/T--Heidelberg--GCBlank.png|Figure 8:|Gas | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/12/T--Heidelberg--GCBlank.png|Figure 8:|Gas chromatogram for the control reaction where the enzyme has been substituted.|}} |
Conclusively, satisfactory concentrations of the products could be achieved and, in case of the organosilicon (3), it could be purified to >98% chemical purity. | Conclusively, satisfactory concentrations of the products could be achieved and, in case of the organosilicon (3), it could be purified to >98% chemical purity. | ||
− | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/79/T--Heidelberg--RawDataAptamer.png|Figure 9:| | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/79/T--Heidelberg--RawDataAptamer.png|Figure 9:|Light emission detection of the NanoLuc reaction for different riboswitch activators and concentrations. Addition of compound (3) to the reaction resulted in increased enzyme activity as indicated by the two bars on the left-hand side compared to the compound (1) reaction.|}} |
− | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8d/T-Heidelberg--FoldActivityProductEduct.png|Figure 10:|Fold activity | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/8d/T-Heidelberg--FoldActivityProductEduct.png|Figure 10:|Fold enzyme activity upon addition of compound (3) compared to compound (1) at either 5 mM concentration (left bar) or 15 mM concentration (right bar). At both concentrations, compound (3) exceeded the reaction activity of compound (1) by 1.5 fold.|}} |
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 20:15, 31 October 2017
Organosilicons
Synthesis of organosilicons and cytochrome engineering
Introduction
Organosilicons are organometallic compounds that consist of carbon-silicon bonds. They are comparable to their corresponding organic analogs but differ in their intrinsic properties. These differences, especially the chemical properties of silicon and its bond formation tendencies, have a significant impact on their bioavailability and their application in medicine. Recent publications cluster their unique features into three categories: The first category comprises the chemical properties of silicon bonds. Typically, silicon forms longer bonds at different angles, which leads to diverse ring conformations and thus, alterations in reactivity. Furthermore, its preference to form single bonds leads to chemical compounds that have a higher intrinsic stability than their carbon analogs. The second category represents the bioavailability of organosilicons. They are more likely to overcome the membrane barrier of cells as they are more lipophilic compared to their respective carbon counterparts. The third - and most important - category deals with the medical application of these compounds. Due to their aforementioned tendency to form single rather than double or triple bonds, they display a viable source for stable pharmaceuticals, which are inaccessible as carbon-based molecules. Additionally, the more electropositive nature of silicon facilitates hydrogen bond formation and conveniently increases the acidity of the compounds. As a result, organosilicons address the major issue in the synthesis of bioactive pharmaceuticals, the design of pro-drugs, as well as a safe medicine with a genuine biomedical benefit. Thus, their main advantage is to operate as pro-drugs due to their thermodynamic stability, but aqueous and acidic instability. On top, as we know so far, silicon is nonhazardous by itself, which makes it a valuable source for further biomedical research.Our Idea
Experimental procedures
Design and cloning of the riboswitch and cytochrome c constructs
The educts for the organosilicon synthesis were commercially available in the case of compound dimethyl(phenyl)silane (2) and ethyl 2-diazopropanoate (5) or were custom synthesized by Fabian Ebner (Greb group, ACI Heidelberg, Germany) in the case of compound 4-(dimethylsilyl)aniline (1). The corresponding riboswitch was designed accordingly using the MAWS software developed by the iGEM Team Heidelberg 2015. To obtain the riboswitch sequence, the chemical structure of the desired product was in silico aligned to randomly generated RNA sequences which were scored according to their ability to form hydrogen bonds with the product. The most favorable sequence (BBa_K2398555) was ordered as oligos which were annealed in a single-cycle Touch-Down PCR, diminishing the temperature by 0.1°C x sec-1 95°C to 10°C. The sequence was ordered as oligos and not as gBlock to ensure overhangs of a specific length and sequence at the 5’ and 3’ ends. The vector and reporter were amplified via PCR and purified by gel extraction (Qiagen). The final plasmid was assembled by using an equimolar concentration of the vector, reporter, and the riboswitch in a golden gate reaction. The plasmid was amplified after transformation in DH10beta cells and purified via plasmid purification (Qiagen). To make organosilicon production more approachable for other iGEM Teams, we codon optimized the wild-type cytochrome c derived from Rhodotermus marinus and cloned it into the pSB1C3 vector. We are proud to present you this part as our desired best basic part. For cloning purposes, we ordered the optimized version as gBlock containing a biobrick prefix and suffix for restriction cloning. We were using this part as a triple mutant, created by F. ArnoldRiboswitch binding assay
Results
Synthesis of the organosilicon compounds
Following the successful synthesis of the two compounds (3) and (4), they were subjected to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for the analysis of validation and calculation of the conversion rate.
Figure 1.1 shows the ethyl 2-((4-aminophenyl)dimethylsilyl)propanoate product with a retention time corresponding to 11.7 minutes. The silicon educt 4-(dimethylsilyl)aniline that emerges at 6.9 minutes implies that there is no complete conversion, possibly due to enzyme inactivity or an unfavorable reaction. Indeed, the conversion rate is 47.5%, which differs from the literature value of 70%Kan.2016 . Nonetheless, the amount of the product formed was sufficient for all further experiments.
The unconverted diazo educt ethyl 2-diazo propanoate corresponds to the retention time peaks at 7.2 and 7.4 minutes. The small peak at 10.8 minutes is likely a side product of the reaction.
The successful product synthesis was further confirmed by mass spectrometry. Fig. 1.2 shows the mass spectrum of the breakdown of the product and its correct mass of 251 Dalton.
The GC-MS analysis of the organosilicon ethyl 2-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)propanoate is demonstrated in Fig. 2. Hereby, Fig. 2.1 shows the complete conversion of the silicon educt dimethyl(phenyl)silane. The product emerges at a retention time of 9.2 minutes. With >99% conversion rate the product was obtained in high quantity. As described before, the MS analysis verified the product and its correct mass of 236 Dalton (Fig. 2.2).
The reaction without the enzyme present served as negative control and is depicted in Fig. 3. As expected, only the two educts emerged after their respective retention time and no product was obtained.
Conclusively, satisfactory concentrations of the products could be achieved and, in case of the organosilicon (3), it could be purified to >98% chemical purity.
Outlook
The increase in enzyme activity upon addition of the specific riboswitch activator was determined in relation to the enzyme activity in presence of the initial substrate. This is demonstrated in Fig. y that shows the 1.5 fold enzyme activity when using the newly synthesized substrate. Overall, these results show the proof-of-principle of the application of organosilicons in the use of riboswitches. Moreover, it presents the promising opportunity to further subject small molecule-sensing riboswitches to an enzyme PACE approach (PREDCEL) for the enhancement of downstream reactions such as gene III activity to facilitate phage propagation.