Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
− | <div <div class="contentbox"> | + | <div <div <div class="contentbox"><div <div class="contentbox"> |
<h1 class="box-heading">Results</h1> | <h1 class="box-heading">Results</h1> | ||
<h3>Characterization of Peptidosomes </h3> | <h3>Characterization of Peptidosomes </h3> | ||
− | <p>Before we could encapsulate bacteria, we had to establish a robust and reproducible protocol of Peptidosome generation under lab conditions. To tackle this task, we used pH indicator cresol red solutions to visualise generated Peptidosomes (Figure | + | <p>Before we could encapsulate bacteria, we had to establish a robust and reproducible protocol of Peptidosome generation under lab conditions. To tackle this task, we used pH indicator cresol red solutions to visualise generated Peptidosomes (Figure 5). In addition to ease the handling of the Peptidosomes, the pH indicator colour also correlated with the status of the Peptidosomes formation. Prior the CO<sub>2</sub> exposure the indicator was red (Figure 5, A), after sufficient CO<sub>2</sub> exposure (will be discussed later) the solution changed to yellow (Figure 5, B), indicating a self-assembled Fmoc-FF layer and thus ready-to-use Peptidosomes.</p> |
<p>These generated Peptidosomes stayed stable after CO<sub>2</sub> treatment and we were able to transfer them into liquid filled petri-dishes or well plates.</p> | <p>These generated Peptidosomes stayed stable after CO<sub>2</sub> treatment and we were able to transfer them into liquid filled petri-dishes or well plates.</p> | ||
− | <p>After we having established the protocol for the Peptidosome creation, we evaluated if we could vary the size of the Peptidosomes. For testing this, we simply generated Peptidosomes of different volumes and could demonstrate successful created and stable Peptidosomes ranging from 1 to 20 µl (Figure | + | <p>After we having established the protocol for the Peptidosome creation, we evaluated if we could vary the size of the Peptidosomes. For testing this, we simply generated Peptidosomes of different volumes and could demonstrate successful created and stable Peptidosomes ranging from 1 to 20 µl (Figure 6).</p> |
<p> | <p> | ||
− | For discovering the optimal exposure time to CO<sub>2</sub> we varied it between 30 sec and 20 min. We found out, that the ones with an exposure time of 10 min were the most stable ones, showing stability after several days, even under 37°C incubation with shaking (Figure | + | For discovering the optimal exposure time to CO<sub>2</sub> we varied it between 30 sec and 20 min. We found out, that the ones with an exposure time of 10 min were the most stable ones, showing stability after several days, even under 37°C incubation with shaking (Figure 7). </p> |
<figure> | <figure> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive floatleft" style="width:35.5%;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive floatleft" style="width:35.5%;"> | ||
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
alt="The color change of the Peptidosomes with pH indicator during production" | alt="The color change of the Peptidosomes with pH indicator during production" | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 5: The color change of the Peptidosomes with pH indicator during production.</b> <b>A</b> Peptidosomes before exposure to CO<sub>2</sub> the pH indicator is red as a control, Peptidosomes without indicator are shown, these are transparent <b>B</b> Peptidosomes after the exposure, only the Peptidosomes with pH indicator changed color from red to yellow</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<figure style="width:29%;" class="makeresponsive floatleft"> | <figure style="width:29%;" class="makeresponsive floatleft"> | ||
Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
alt="Different sizes of Peptidosomes" | alt="Different sizes of Peptidosomes" | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 6: Different sizes of Peptidosomes</b> </figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive floatleft" style="width:35.5%;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive floatleft" style="width:35.5%;"> | ||
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
alt="Peptidosomes generated with different exposure times." | alt="Peptidosomes generated with different exposure times." | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 7: Peptidosomes generated with different exposure times. </b> Peptidosomes are shown, which were exposed to CO<sub>2</sub> for 30 sec, 3 min, 5 min, 10 min or 20 min.</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
alt="Diffusion between the inside of the Peptidosomes and the surrounding environment." | alt="Diffusion between the inside of the Peptidosomes and the surrounding environment." | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 8: Diffusion between the inside of the Peptidosomes and the surrounding environment. </b> The Peptidosomes are shown directly after transfer in water (transparent liquid) or LB medium (yellowish liquid) and after 30 minutes.</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
<p>Using a straight forward experiment, applying the pH-indicator we were able to prove that a diffusion between the inside of the Peptidosome and the surrounding environment is possible. We transferred Peptidosomes to water or LB medium and monitored the time the pH indicator needed to diffuse outside of the Peptidosomes. </p> | <p>Using a straight forward experiment, applying the pH-indicator we were able to prove that a diffusion between the inside of the Peptidosome and the surrounding environment is possible. We transferred Peptidosomes to water or LB medium and monitored the time the pH indicator needed to diffuse outside of the Peptidosomes. </p> | ||
− | <p>The yellow color of both Paptidosomes (in water and LB) faded over time (Figure | + | <p>The yellow color of both Paptidosomes (in water and LB) faded over time (Figure 8). In water (left panel), the yellow color completely vanished after about 25-30 minutes. In LB the same effect was visible after 45-50 minutes (right panel). |
These observations met our expectations, as the Fmoc-FF membrane is a network of tiny pores, rather than a closed shell. These pores allow the exchange with the surrounding liquid.</p> | These observations met our expectations, as the Fmoc-FF membrane is a network of tiny pores, rather than a closed shell. These pores allow the exchange with the surrounding liquid.</p> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <p>Proving that diffusion between the inside of the Peptidosome and the surrounding is possible, we next tested if diffusion between two Peptidosomes which are in direct contact is possible. For this experiment only one of the two connected Peptidosomes contained the coloured pH indicator solution. Over the lapse of 1.5 hours, it was possible to observe a diffusion of the colour between both peptidosome until it reached an equilibrium (Figure | + | <p>Proving that diffusion between the inside of the Peptidosome and the surrounding is possible, we next tested if diffusion between two Peptidosomes which are in direct contact is possible. For this experiment only one of the two connected Peptidosomes contained the coloured pH indicator solution. Over the lapse of 1.5 hours, it was possible to observe a diffusion of the colour between both peptidosome until it reached an equilibrium (Figure 9). This proved that there is intercommunication, between the two Peptidosomes. </p> |
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 65%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;""> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 65%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;""> | ||
Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
alt="Diffusion between Peptidosomes" | alt="Diffusion between Peptidosomes" | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 9: Diffusion between Peptidosomes </b> Different time points of the experiment are shown. The yellow peptidosome (with pH indicator) was fused with an empty Peptidosome (transparent). The color change was then observed over time (1.5 h).</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
− | <p>Additionally, to the previous described method of Peptidosome generation, we also tried a microinjection-technique. By doing so, we injected a coloured solution to the inside of the Peptidosome (Figure | + | <p>Additionally, to the previous described method of Peptidosome generation, we also tried a microinjection-technique. By doing so, we injected a coloured solution to the inside of the Peptidosome (Figure 10). To close the membrane hole that was introduced by the thin glass capillary, the Peptidosome was after injection again exposed to CO<sub>2</sub> for 5 min. Followed by this procedure, the Peptidosome was transferred to water and as shown in Figure 10 E) the peptidosome was stable. </p> |
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 60%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 60%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/be/T--TU_Dresden--microinjection.png" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/be/T--TU_Dresden--microinjection.png" | ||
alt="Microinjection of stained water into a Peptidosome" | alt="Microinjection of stained water into a Peptidosome" | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 10: Microinjection of stained water into a Peptidosome </b> A), B), C), D): injection of the solution with a glass capillary E) in water tranferred Peptidosome of this method.</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
Line 190: | Line 190: | ||
alt="Comparison of B.subtilis cell growth at different pH values" | alt="Comparison of B.subtilis cell growth at different pH values" | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 11: Comparison of <i><b>B.subtilis</b></i> cell growth at different pH values </b> Shown is the change in optical density over the cultivation period. Each graph represents a culture approach. In all batches, NaOH or water (red dot) was induced after one hour to adjust a certain pH value.</b> </figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Line 209: | Line 209: | ||
<p>For the first experiments of encapsulation, we used the <i>B. subtilis</i> strains TMB4131 W168 <i>lacA::erm Pveg_sfGFP</i> and TMB3090 W168 <i>sacA::cat Pveg_luxABCDE</i>. The first strain has the characteristic of expressing sfGFP in a constitutive way, which was useful to prove the presence of bacteria in the Peptidosomes by detecting the fluorescence expressed by the cells. TMB3090 expresses luciferase in a constitutive way, which makes a detection of a luminescence signal possible. | <p>For the first experiments of encapsulation, we used the <i>B. subtilis</i> strains TMB4131 W168 <i>lacA::erm Pveg_sfGFP</i> and TMB3090 W168 <i>sacA::cat Pveg_luxABCDE</i>. The first strain has the characteristic of expressing sfGFP in a constitutive way, which was useful to prove the presence of bacteria in the Peptidosomes by detecting the fluorescence expressed by the cells. TMB3090 expresses luciferase in a constitutive way, which makes a detection of a luminescence signal possible. | ||
We performed a plate reader assay using the well-scan-mode. In this mode, the whole well is scanned to detect the exact position of a signal, either fluorescence or luminescence. Its absence is displayed in a map with a green colour, while the position of the fluorescence/luminescence source appears as red. Please check ot the concerning <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Experiments">protocol</a>.</p> | We performed a plate reader assay using the well-scan-mode. In this mode, the whole well is scanned to detect the exact position of a signal, either fluorescence or luminescence. Its absence is displayed in a map with a green colour, while the position of the fluorescence/luminescence source appears as red. Please check ot the concerning <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Experiments">protocol</a>.</p> | ||
− | <p>In figure | + | <p>In figure 12 examples of the well scans of different samples are displayed.</p> |
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 60%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 60%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | ||
Line 215: | Line 215: | ||
alt="Overview Well-scans of the Plate Reader Assay " | alt="Overview Well-scans of the Plate Reader Assay " | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><br><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><br><b>Figure 12: Overview of well-scans of the Plate Reader Assay </b> The results of the well-scan measurements for the detection of fluorescence and luminescence are shown. If no signal is detected, the field of the matrix is green, otherwise red.</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
alt="Peptidosome with encapsulated fluorescent bacteria" | alt="Peptidosome with encapsulated fluorescent bacteria" | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 13: Peptidosome with encapsulated fluorescent bacteria </b></figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <p>The encapsulation of <i>B. subtilis</i> expressing sfGFP in a constitutive way was also demonstrated by the fluorescence microscopy. In this experiment, the bacteria were encapsulated as described. As shown in Figure | + | <p>The encapsulation of <i>B. subtilis</i> expressing sfGFP in a constitutive way was also demonstrated by the fluorescence microscopy. In this experiment, the bacteria were encapsulated as described. As shown in Figure 13, the Peptidosome emitted green light what proved the existence of sfGFP-expressing bacteria inside of the Peptidosome. </p> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Line 293: | Line 293: | ||
class="makeresponsive zoom"> | class="makeresponsive zoom"> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <figcaption> <b>Figure | + | <figcaption> <b>Figure 14: SEM pictures</b> A) whole Peptidosome B),C) Details of the membrane D),E),F) Details of the bacteria trapped in the Peptidosome membrane </figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Line 345: | Line 345: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <figcaption> <b>Figure | + | <figcaption> <b>Figure 15: SEM pictures</b> A), B) Membrane overview C),D) Membrane details; A), C) washings steps B), D) pH treatment </figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
− | <p>In the second measurement the number of detectable bacteria that lie or are integrated on the membrane is significantly lower. Only a few individual fibers are visible and the surface is wrinkled. ( | + | <p>In the second measurement the number of detectable bacteria that lie or are integrated on the membrane is significantly lower. Only a few individual fibers are visible and the surface is wrinkled. (Figure 15 A), B)) </p> |
<p>Only on the Peptidosome with the low pH treatment, a cell that was not integrated in the membrane was observed (D). </p> | <p>Only on the Peptidosome with the low pH treatment, a cell that was not integrated in the membrane was observed (D). </p> | ||
<p>The results of the growth experiment with the additional treatments were confirmed microscopically. There was no significant improvement in the Peptidosomes treated with acid LB medium compared to the sole integration of wash steps. Only a single cell, which could relieve from the Peptidosome, was detected. This confirms the reduced number of colonies in the supernatant of the growth experiment when carrying out the additional treatment methods. </p> | <p>The results of the growth experiment with the additional treatments were confirmed microscopically. There was no significant improvement in the Peptidosomes treated with acid LB medium compared to the sole integration of wash steps. Only a single cell, which could relieve from the Peptidosome, was detected. This confirms the reduced number of colonies in the supernatant of the growth experiment when carrying out the additional treatment methods. </p> | ||
Line 364: | Line 364: | ||
</video> | </video> | ||
− | <p>Nevertheless, the surface of DynaBeads can be decorated with His-Tag protein. For the “proof of principle” experiments His-Tag GFP were selected due to its availability and easy imaging procedure. First, the Invitrogen Protocol was optimized for our goals and tested for DynaBeads decoration with histidine-tagged GFP (Figure | + | <p>Nevertheless, the surface of DynaBeads can be decorated with His-Tag protein. For the “proof of principle” experiments His-Tag GFP were selected due to its availability and easy imaging procedure. First, the Invitrogen Protocol was optimized for our goals and tested for DynaBeads decoration with histidine-tagged GFP (Figure 16). </p> |
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 65%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 65%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | ||
Line 370: | Line 370: | ||
alt="Dynabeads labeled with histidine-tagged GFP in the Binding/Wash buffer." | alt="Dynabeads labeled with histidine-tagged GFP in the Binding/Wash buffer." | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 16: Dynabeads labeled with histidine-tagged GFP in the Binding/Wash buffer. </b> A) transmitted light B) fluorenscence </figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <p>To prove the surface of the Dynabeads enveloped to the Peptidosome membrane availability for the decoration the labeling procedure was applied after the Peptidosome formation in both Binding/Wash Buffer and LB media ( | + | <p>To prove the surface of the Dynabeads enveloped to the Peptidosome membrane availability for the decoration the labeling procedure was applied after the Peptidosome formation in both Binding/Wash Buffer and LB media (Figure 17). </p> |
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | ||
Line 379: | Line 379: | ||
alt="Peptidosome with Dynabeads labeled with His-Tag GFP in Binding/Wash Buffer (A) or LB media (B)" | alt="Peptidosome with Dynabeads labeled with His-Tag GFP in Binding/Wash Buffer (A) or LB media (B)" | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 17: Peptidosome with Dynabeads labeled with His-Tag GFP in Binding/Wash Buffer (A) or LB media (B) </b> </figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p>In conclusion, here we proved the possibility of Peptidosome surface decoration with histidine-tagged molecules that can be used for various applications where enzymatic activity of the surface of Peptidosome or Peptidosome immobilization is required. Surface decoration protocol is compatible with almost any goals due to its flexibility, as the decoration procedure can be performed before and after Peptidosome formation in the specific Binding/Washing buffer or just in the LB media. </p> | <p>In conclusion, here we proved the possibility of Peptidosome surface decoration with histidine-tagged molecules that can be used for various applications where enzymatic activity of the surface of Peptidosome or Peptidosome immobilization is required. Surface decoration protocol is compatible with almost any goals due to its flexibility, as the decoration procedure can be performed before and after Peptidosome formation in the specific Binding/Washing buffer or just in the LB media. </p> |
Revision as of 14:06, 1 November 2017