alt="Figure 4: Results from growth inhibition experiment" class="zoom">
alt="Figure 4: Results from growth inhibition experiment" class="zoom">
−
<figcaption><b>Figure 4: Growth curves of W168 <b>(1a-f)</b> and W168 <i>penP::kan<sup><i>R</i></sup></i> <b>(2a-f)</b> showing an effect after treatment with the tested antibiotics indicated in the legend above the graphs. </b>Samples were induced after 1 hour with <b>(a)</b> ampicillin 1 and 2, <b>(b)</b> carbenicillin 1 and 2, <b>(c)</b> cefoperazone 1 and 2, <b>(d)</b> cefalexin 1 and 2, <b>(e)</b> cefoxitin 1 and 2 as well as with <b>(f)</b> penicillin G 1 and 2. Every graph shows also the controls, where we induced with bacitracin 1 and 2 and dH<sub>2</sub>O. Number 1 and 2 represent the two different concentrations tested of each antibiotic. The concentrations refer to table 3.
+
<figcaption><b>Figure 4: Growth curves of W168 <b>(1a-f)</b> and W168 <b><i>penP::kan<sup><b><i>R</i></b></sup></i></b> <b>(2a-f)</b> showing an effect after treatment with the tested antibiotics indicated in the legend above the graphs. </b>Samples were induced after 1 hour with <b>(a)</b> ampicillin 1 and 2, <b>(b)</b> carbenicillin 1 and 2, <b>(c)</b> cefoperazone 1 and 2, <b>(d)</b> cefalexin 1 and 2, <b>(e)</b> cefoxitin 1 and 2 as well as with <b>(f)</b> penicillin G 1 and 2. Every graph shows also the controls, where we induced with bacitracin 1 and 2 and dH<sub>2</sub>O. Number 1 and 2 represent the two different concentrations tested of each antibiotic. The concentrations refer to table 3.
</b></figcaption>
</b></figcaption>
</figure>
</figure>
Revision as of 17:31, 29 October 2017
Short Description
Worldwide, multidrug-resistant germs are on the rise and provoke the intensive search for novel effective compounds. To simplify the search for new antibiotics and to track the antibiotic pollution in water samples, whole-cell biosensors constitute a helpful investigative tool. In this subproject, we developed a functional and complete heterologous Beta-lactam biosensor in Bacillus subtilis. By the time these specified cells sense a compound of the beta-lactam family, they will respond by producing a measurable luminescence signal. Thereby, we analyzed the detection range and sensitivity of the biosensor in response to six different Beta-lactam antibiotics from various subclasses. The evaluated Biosensor was then encapsulated into Peptidosomes to proof the concept of our project EncaBcillus. The trapping of engineered bacteria thus will allow for increased control and simplified handling, potentially raising the chances for their application in e.g. sewage treatment plants.
Background
Design
Genetic engineering
To achieve our goal of encapsulating bacteria into Peptidosomes that can sense antibiotics of the beta-lactam family, we first needed to develop a reliable biosensor strain.
In Staphylococcus aureus the bla-operon encodes a one-component system, which is responsible for sensing and mediating resistance against beta-lactam antibiotics. The idea was to transfer the regulatory elements of this operon to Bacillus subtilis and replace the native output – being the beta-lactamase BlaZ – by an easy detectable signal. Thus, making Bacillus subtilis a beta-lactam sensing biosensor. (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: Overall concept showing the components and the molecular mechanism of the Biosensor in B. subtilis.Upon binding of a beta-lactam to the receptor BlaR1 (1), due to the receptors c-terminal proteolytic activity, the repressor BlaI is degraded and frees the target promoter (2) enabling the expression of an easy detectable reporter (3).
Figure 3: Genetic constructs necessary for the functional Biosensor strain:(A)blaR1 under control of the constitutive promoter Pveg or the inducible promoter PxylA, (B)blaI downstream of the promoter PlepA, and (C) the promoters PblaZ or PblaR1I controlling the expression of the luxABCDE operon.
For the creation of our biosensor in B. subtilis, the bla-operon from S. aureus was split into three genetic constructs: (A) The Receptor gene blaR1 under control of a strong constitutive promotor (Pveg), (B) the Repressor gene blaI under control moderate strong constitutive promoter (PlepA) and (C) the target promoter region of the bla-operon (PblaZ and PblaR1I) in front of the lux-operon (luxABCDE) (see Figure 3). In addition, an inducible version of the blaR1 construct was made by placing the PxylA promoter upstream of the blaR1 gene (A).[5]
For submission of our parts to the registry, all Biobricks were cloned into the pSB1C3 backbone. The created genetic constructs were verified by sequencing (Eurofins or GATC sequencing services). All designed plasmids were stored in Escherichia coli DH10β (see Experiments and Protocols for details). In this project, we used integrative single-copy B. subtilis specific vectors that stably integrate into the genome at designated loci.[6]
Biosensor Characterization
First, we investigated the detection range towards different beta-lactam families as well as the sensitivity of the created biosensor. Therefore, we conducted plate reader experiments and disk diffusion assays to test our biosensor in liquid as well as on solid conditions. We recorded the luminescence signal and growth behavior (see Experiments and Protocols for details) of our biosensor strains in the presence of six different beta-lactam antibiotics. We also included physiological controls that lack one or two of the genetic constructs of the complete biosensor machinery.
Furthermore, we analyzed the impact of deleting the Bacillus subtilis gene penP - encoding a beta-lactamase (which has not been studied intensively yet) - on the luminescence output. The strain W168 penP::kanR was created via Long-Flanking Homology PCR (see Experiments and Protocols for details). We also investigated, if the different beta-lactam antibiotics induce the promoter driving PenP.[7]
Encapsulation into Peptidosomes
Finally, we could demonstrate a fully functional biosensor encapsulated in Peptidosomes. For this we used the strain showing the strongest response, broadest detection range and the highest viability when tested with different beta-lactams. Peptidosomes containing the biosensor, were exposed to different Beta-lactams and development of the luminescence signal was obtain every hour over a time period of 5 hours.
Results
1. Determination of Inhibitory Antibiotic Concentrations
Before starting the actual tests regarding the functionality of the beta-lactam biosensor, several pretests have been conducted to determine the optimal antibiotic concentration for the subsequent experiments. Therefore, we analyzed the concentration dependent effect of six different beta-lactam antibiotics on the growth of Bacillus subtilis W168 and a strain missing the functional beta-lactamase PenP (W168 penP::kanR). The beta-lactams tested in this and the following assays were: Ampicillin, Carbenicillin, Cefoperazone, Cefoxitin, Cefalexin and Penicillin G. As controls we chose water(dH2O) and the antibiotic Bacitracin, which does not belong to the group of beta-lactams.
Table 3: Antibiotic concentrations in [µg µl-1] (final concentration in well) used in the killing assay carried out in triplicates.
Several preliminary plate reader experiments have been implemented using a 96 well plate format, in which we tested at least six different concentrations of each antibiotic. These assays were not performed in triplicates. Finally, the concentrations were narrowed down to two concentrations per antibiotic (see Table 3) that would cause a slight growth inhibition, to use in the following assay performed in triplicates (see Figure 4). All tests regarding antibiotic effects were implemented with Mueller Hinton Medium. The strains were induced after 1 hour of growth at 37°C in the plate reader. The growth was followed by measuring the optical density at OD=600nm for 18 hours every 5 minutes.
We expected a higher growth inhibition at higher antibiotic concentrations and a higher sensitivity to the antibiotics of the penP mutant. Adding distilled water to the culture should not show any effect on the growth of both tested strains.
Figure 4: Growth curves of W168 (1a-f) and W168 penP::kanR(2a-f) showing an effect after treatment with the tested antibiotics indicated in the legend above the graphs. Samples were induced after 1 hour with (a) ampicillin 1 and 2, (b) carbenicillin 1 and 2, (c) cefoperazone 1 and 2, (d) cefalexin 1 and 2, (e) cefoxitin 1 and 2 as well as with (f) penicillin G 1 and 2. Every graph shows also the controls, where we induced with bacitracin 1 and 2 and dH2O. Number 1 and 2 represent the two different concentrations tested of each antibiotic. The concentrations refer to table 3.
Table4: Antibiotic concentrations in [µg µl-1] (final concentration in well) used in all further plate reader experiments.
As expected, the data from the pretest performed in triplicates in Figure 4 show, that the presence of the beta-lactamase PenP plays a key role in facilitating survival at higher antibiotic concentrations. The wild type strain B. subtilis W168 is therefore able to grow at higher antibiotic concentrations as the mutant W168 penP::kanR when treated with ampicillin, carbenicillin, cefoperazone, cefoxitin and penicillin G (see Figure 4). However, this was not the case for cefalexin and bacitracin. Here, we could not observe any difference in growth inhibition between the wild type and the penP mutant in regard to the tested concentrations (see Figure 4). Cefalexin showed a very strong inhibitory effect on the growth of both wildtype and the mutant. For this reason, we chose a relatively weak final concentration (see Table 4 below). Furthermore, we noticed a growth inhibition of the mutant W168 penP::kanR during the stationary phase, especially when treated with Carbenicillin, Cefalexin and Penicillin G (data not shown). For this reason, we selected weaker antibiotic concentrations for the upcoming experiments with this mutant.
From these first experiments, we selected the final antibiotic concentrations for the upcoming plate reader experiments with the biosensor strains (see Table 4)
2. Analysis of Detection Range and Sensitivity
2.1 Assessing the Detection Range via Plate Reader Assays
Table4: Antibiotic concentrations in [µg µl-1] (final concentration in well) used in all further plate reader experiments.
During this project, we generated several strains to investigate the functionality of the heterologous constructs constituting the biosensor in Bacillus subtilis [file strains?]. This result section though will focus on the evaluation of the strains shown in table 5 as these represent the most interesting ones.
In our first experiment, we performed plate reader assays in a 96 well plate format and measured growth (OD600) and luminescence output for 18 hours every 5 minutes. Induction with the Beta-lactam antibiotics occurred after 1 hour. All strains have been tested in triplicates under the same conditions. Strains with the genotype penP::kanR have been induced with lower concentrations compared to the wild type strain W168 (see Table 4 above).
After induction, we anticipate a strong increase in luminescence signal for strains containing the full set of constructs (PblaZ_lux or PblaR1I_lux, Pveg_blaR1 or Pxyl_blaR1, PlepA_blaI), thus representing functional biosensors. Besides the biosensor constructs, we also tested all physiological controls missing one essential composite of the biosensor`s heterologous one-component system (data not shown). The control strain W168 (wild type) and control 1, will not show any luminescence output, while the positive control 2 is expected to show a steady luminescence signal regardless of the presence of any antibiotic compound.
Table5: Strains of interest with their names and important genotype remarks for differentiation.
As the beta-lactamase PenP confers resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in B. subtilis, a rising luminescence signal is estimated for the PpenP_lux constructs post induction. Generally, the Pxyl promoter is activated by adding Xylose as an inducer to the medium. In the plate reader experiments, 0.2% xylose was added to the cells starting from the day culture step.
Further we propose biosensor strains carrying the genotype remark penP::kanR to give a stronger signal in presence of beta-lactam compounds, as they cannot be degraded by the PenP enzyme.
The bar charts in Figure 5 illustrate the best biosensor constructs identified in the plate reader experiments and compares the relative luminescence units of the strains reached 2 hours after induction.
Figure 5: RLU/OD600 values of the different biosensors and the controls at 2 hours after induction with the 6 Beta-lactams, bacitracin and dH2O. The legend above defines the coloration of the single bars in each chart. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. The text boxes illustrate the maximal RLU/OD600 reached 2 hours post induction.
As shown in figure 5, the wildtype W168 (black with white dots) shows no increase in RLU values when induced with the different beta-lactam antibiotics and controls. Control 1 (black tight stripes) behaves similarly to the wild type strain. The slight decrease of Control 2 (light grey) in the bar chart where induction with ampicillin and carbenicillin happened, is mostly explained by the higher growth inhibition caused by the chosen concentrations for W168 (with penP). Most of the times, the constitutive expression of the lux operon resulted in an RLU of over 1.3 million for control 2 (see Figure 5).
Biosensor 1 gives an overall good signal for all beta-lactam antibiotics tested, but also shows a higher basal activity in absence of the beta-lactam compounds of 40.000- 90.000 RLU (see Figure 5, bar chart with bacitracin and dH2O). Further, we could observe a difference in signal intensity dependent on the beta-lactam antibiotic tested. Therefore, biosensor 1 gives the highest signal in presence of penicillin G, cefoxitin and cefoperazone with up to 2.7 million RLU. Ampicillin and penicillin G again show a weaker increase in signal produced by biosensor 1, which could be due to the same reason as for control 2 (see Figure 5).
For Biosensor 2, the detection range and sensitivity is comparable to Biosensor 1, This strain strongly senses cefoxitin, ampicillin and cefoperazone reaching up to 2.4 million RLU. Even the basal activity of the PblaZ promoter in biosensor 2, as shown in the bar charts with bacitracin and dH2O, conforms with the one from biosensor 1.
The activity of biosensor 3 can be induced by adding Xylose (0.2% final concentration) to the sample. In absence of Xylose, the signal is very weak as can be seen in the bar with the dark blue stripes (see Figure 5). This is due to the fact, that without xylose, nearly no receptor molecules are localized at the bacteria`s cell surface and the signal cannot be detected and amplified. For induction with cefoperazone though, the weak receptor density on the surface because of the leaky expression of blaR1, seems to be enough to cause a quite powerful signal already. From this finding can be concluded, that the receptor seems to have a high affinity to cefoperazone. In the bar charts of bacitracin and dH2O (see Figure 5), Biosensor 3 shows the lowest basal promoter activity compared to the other two Biosensors tested. Here, we could also observe a high sensitivity for penicillin G, cefoxitin, cefoperazone and ampicillin. In general, all Biosensors show good performance in liquid MH-Medium. They able to detect the six beta-lactams reliably by giving a signal way stronger than the basal luminescence.