Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
− | <p>Hier muss noch eine Einleitung stehen, die dem Background angepasst ist!</p> | + | <p><b>Hier muss noch eine Einleitung stehen, die dem Background angepasst ist!</b></p> |
+ | |||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <figure class="makeresponsive floatleft" style="width: 50%;"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/0c/T--TU_Dresden--pHchange.png" | ||
+ | alt="The color change of the peptidosomes with pH indicator during production" | ||
+ | class="zoom"> | ||
+ | <figcaption><b>Figure 1: The color change of the peptidosomes with pH indicator during production</b> A) Peptidosomes before exposure to CO2, red colored are peptidosomes with pH indicator, transparent ones without, B) Peptidosomes after the exposure, only the peptidosomes with pH indicator have a discoloration (yellow).</figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <figure class="makeresponsive floatright" style="width: 50%;"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/31/T--TU_Dresden--peptidosomesizes.png" | ||
+ | alt="Different sizes of Peptidosomes" | ||
+ | class="zoom"> | ||
+ | <figcaption><b>Figure 2: Different sizes of Peptidosomes</b> </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
<p>For making the pH-drop visible and colour the peptidosomes we used the pH- indicator cresol red, which acquires a red or violet tone with pH of 7 and higher (initially the Fmoc-FF solution has a pH of 10.5), and turns yellow at pH 6 and below. The pH indicator was added to the Fmoc-FF solution and produced the peptidosomes as describes in (LINK TO DESIGN).</p> | <p>For making the pH-drop visible and colour the peptidosomes we used the pH- indicator cresol red, which acquires a red or violet tone with pH of 7 and higher (initially the Fmoc-FF solution has a pH of 10.5), and turns yellow at pH 6 and below. The pH indicator was added to the Fmoc-FF solution and produced the peptidosomes as describes in (LINK TO DESIGN).</p> | ||
<p>We created Peptidosomes with a range of 1 to 20 µL successfully. For discovering the optimal exposure time to CO2 we varied it between 30 sec and 20 min. We found out, that the ones with an exposure time of 10 min were the most stable ones, showing stability after several days, even under 37°C incubation with shaking. </p> | <p>We created Peptidosomes with a range of 1 to 20 µL successfully. For discovering the optimal exposure time to CO2 we varied it between 30 sec and 20 min. We found out, that the ones with an exposure time of 10 min were the most stable ones, showing stability after several days, even under 37°C incubation with shaking. </p> | ||
Line 94: | Line 109: | ||
<p>With a really straight forward experiment, including the help of the pH-indicator we were able to prove that a diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the surrounding environment is possible. We transferred Peptidosomes to water or LB-Media and measured the time it took for the colour to disappear, or in other words, the time it takes for the coloured solution inside the cage to diffuse out of it. </p> | <p>With a really straight forward experiment, including the help of the pH-indicator we were able to prove that a diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the surrounding environment is possible. We transferred Peptidosomes to water or LB-Media and measured the time it took for the colour to disappear, or in other words, the time it takes for the coloured solution inside the cage to diffuse out of it. </p> | ||
<p>Proving that diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the environment is possible, we wanted to know next if diffusion between two peptidosomes which are in direct contact is possible. For this experiment only one of the two connected peptidosomes contained coloured solution. Over the lapse of around 1.5 hours, it was possible to observe how the colour was disseminating to the non-coloured peptidosome until it reached an equilibrium (Figure X), proving that there is diffusion, or intercommunication, between the two peptidosomes. </p> | <p>Proving that diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the environment is possible, we wanted to know next if diffusion between two peptidosomes which are in direct contact is possible. For this experiment only one of the two connected peptidosomes contained coloured solution. Over the lapse of around 1.5 hours, it was possible to observe how the colour was disseminating to the non-coloured peptidosome until it reached an equilibrium (Figure X), proving that there is diffusion, or intercommunication, between the two peptidosomes. </p> | ||
− | |||
<p>Additionally, to the previous described method, we used a microinjection-technique to inject a coloured solution to the inside of the peptidosome (figure XXX). To close the hole that was probably opened on the membrane by the introducing the glass capillary, the peptidosome was exposed again for 5 min to CO2. Afterwards it was transferred to water. As shown in figure XXX D) the peptidosome was stable. </p> | <p>Additionally, to the previous described method, we used a microinjection-technique to inject a coloured solution to the inside of the peptidosome (figure XXX). To close the hole that was probably opened on the membrane by the introducing the glass capillary, the peptidosome was exposed again for 5 min to CO2. Afterwards it was transferred to water. As shown in figure XXX D) the peptidosome was stable. </p> | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
Line 112: | Line 126: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<p>Treatment 1 was a negative control, since the strain of B. subtilis (wildtype) cannot develop in absence of nitrogen, so no growth at all was expected. Treatment 2 was the positive control: with the nitrogen supplement, B. subtilis should be able to grow. These expectations corresponded with reality: colonies grew in treatment 2 but none in treatment 1. Treatments 3 and 4 did not result in colony growth either, meaning that the Fmoc-FF cannot be used as a source of nitrogen for the bacteria. </p> | <p>Treatment 1 was a negative control, since the strain of B. subtilis (wildtype) cannot develop in absence of nitrogen, so no growth at all was expected. Treatment 2 was the positive control: with the nitrogen supplement, B. subtilis should be able to grow. These expectations corresponded with reality: colonies grew in treatment 2 but none in treatment 1. Treatments 3 and 4 did not result in colony growth either, meaning that the Fmoc-FF cannot be used as a source of nitrogen for the bacteria. </p> | ||
Line 118: | Line 134: | ||
<p>The experiment to test the tolerance was performed as follows: B. subtilis culture was divided in four treatments, varying the pH of the culture in each one; 7 (normal growth condition as a control), 8, 9, and 10. NaOH was used to induce the different changes in the pH for each treatment, and was added after one hour of cultivation. The experiment was carried out in a plate reader to follow the change of the optical density (OD 600) which correlates with bacterial growth. </p> | <p>The experiment to test the tolerance was performed as follows: B. subtilis culture was divided in four treatments, varying the pH of the culture in each one; 7 (normal growth condition as a control), 8, 9, and 10. NaOH was used to induce the different changes in the pH for each treatment, and was added after one hour of cultivation. The experiment was carried out in a plate reader to follow the change of the optical density (OD 600) which correlates with bacterial growth. </p> | ||
+ | |||
<p>The graph shows the growth of the organisms under each condition. It can be observed that from pH 7 to 9, no significant change in the growth is observed. However, under pH 10, the organism stops its growth. To check if the bacteria was still viable after the high pH treatment, it was transferred to growth plates with neutral pH. There, it was observed that B. subtilis was able to recover and growth normally, meaning that the organism can survive the process of encapsulation. </p> | <p>The graph shows the growth of the organisms under each condition. It can be observed that from pH 7 to 9, no significant change in the growth is observed. However, under pH 10, the organism stops its growth. To check if the bacteria was still viable after the high pH treatment, it was transferred to growth plates with neutral pH. There, it was observed that B. subtilis was able to recover and growth normally, meaning that the organism can survive the process of encapsulation. </p> | ||
Line 130: | Line 147: | ||
We performed a plate reader assay using the well-scan-mode. In this mode, the whole well is scanned to detect the exact position of a signal, either fluorescence or luminescence. Its absence is displayed in a map with a green colour, while the position of the fluorescence/luminescence source appears as red. </p> | We performed a plate reader assay using the well-scan-mode. In this mode, the whole well is scanned to detect the exact position of a signal, either fluorescence or luminescence. Its absence is displayed in a map with a green colour, while the position of the fluorescence/luminescence source appears as red. </p> | ||
<p>The well scan maps appear completely green where fluorescence/luminescence is absent, i.e. water and empty peptidosome. Wells containing a sample of the day culture and lyophilized eGFP solved in water show a red colour in the whole map. However, a localized red spot over a green background is observed where the source of fluorescence/luminescence is contained: the cells trapped inside the peptidosomes. This shows that when the peptidosome with cells inside is transferred to water, bacteria cannot diffuse away, but its kept contained within the structure, resulting in a localized red signal. </p> | <p>The well scan maps appear completely green where fluorescence/luminescence is absent, i.e. water and empty peptidosome. Wells containing a sample of the day culture and lyophilized eGFP solved in water show a red colour in the whole map. However, a localized red spot over a green background is observed where the source of fluorescence/luminescence is contained: the cells trapped inside the peptidosomes. This shows that when the peptidosome with cells inside is transferred to water, bacteria cannot diffuse away, but its kept contained within the structure, resulting in a localized red signal. </p> | ||
+ | |||
<h4> Fluorescence microscopy</h4> | <h4> Fluorescence microscopy</h4> | ||
<p>The encapsulation of B. subtitilis expressing sfGFP in a constitutive way was also demonstrated by the fluorescence microscopy. In this experiment, the bacteria were encapsulated as described. As seen in Figure X, the peptidosome emitted green light what proved the existence of sfGFP-expressing bacteria. </p> | <p>The encapsulation of B. subtitilis expressing sfGFP in a constitutive way was also demonstrated by the fluorescence microscopy. In this experiment, the bacteria were encapsulated as described. As seen in Figure X, the peptidosome emitted green light what proved the existence of sfGFP-expressing bacteria. </p> | ||
Line 144: | Line 162: | ||
<p>By introducing the treatments, the number of colonies was reduced from several hundreds to an average of .7 for the washing steps and 1.7 for the low pH treatment. After analysing the results, we concluded that the washing steps are important to reduce the number of cells released in the supernatant, whereas the treatment with acid broth does not add a significant effect on this. In that way, by introducing the washing steps and also reducing the concentration of cells in the peptidosomes, the amount of bacteria present on the outer surface of the membrane was importantly diminished, fact that was corroborated by performing a second cryo-SEM and showed below. </p> | <p>By introducing the treatments, the number of colonies was reduced from several hundreds to an average of .7 for the washing steps and 1.7 for the low pH treatment. After analysing the results, we concluded that the washing steps are important to reduce the number of cells released in the supernatant, whereas the treatment with acid broth does not add a significant effect on this. In that way, by introducing the washing steps and also reducing the concentration of cells in the peptidosomes, the amount of bacteria present on the outer surface of the membrane was importantly diminished, fact that was corroborated by performing a second cryo-SEM and showed below. </p> | ||
+ | |||
<p>In the second measurement the number of detectable bacteria that lie or are integrated on the membrane is significantly lower. Only a few individual fibers are visible and the surface is wrinkled. (figure XX A), B)) </p> | <p>In the second measurement the number of detectable bacteria that lie or are integrated on the membrane is significantly lower. Only a few individual fibers are visible and the surface is wrinkled. (figure XX A), B)) </p> | ||
<p>Only on the peptidosome with the low pH treatment, a cell that was not integrated in the membrane was observed (D). </p> | <p>Only on the peptidosome with the low pH treatment, a cell that was not integrated in the membrane was observed (D). </p> | ||
<p>The results of the growth experiment with the additional treatments were confirmed microscopically. There was no significant improvement in the peptidosomes treated with acid LB medium compared to the sole integration of wash steps. Only a single cell, which could relieve from the peptidosome, was detected. This confirms the reduced number of colonies in the supernatant of the growth experiment when carrying out the additional treatment methods. </p> | <p>The results of the growth experiment with the additional treatments were confirmed microscopically. There was no significant improvement in the peptidosomes treated with acid LB medium compared to the sole integration of wash steps. Only a single cell, which could relieve from the peptidosome, was detected. This confirms the reduced number of colonies in the supernatant of the growth experiment when carrying out the additional treatment methods. </p> | ||
+ | |||
<p>The one loosely attached cell might be a problem for some applications where the surrounding medium is expected to be free of bacteria, therefore, the manufacturing technique of peptidosomes should be adapted accordingly. An adequate method for this could be introducing the cells by microinjection, since there is not a chance that bacteria can be attached to the outer part of the membrane. </p> | <p>The one loosely attached cell might be a problem for some applications where the surrounding medium is expected to be free of bacteria, therefore, the manufacturing technique of peptidosomes should be adapted accordingly. An adequate method for this could be introducing the cells by microinjection, since there is not a chance that bacteria can be attached to the outer part of the membrane. </p> | ||
Line 154: | Line 174: | ||
<p>Nevertheless, the surface of DynaBeads can be decorated with His-Tag protein. For the “proof of principle” experiments His-Tag GFP were selected due to its availability and easy imaging procedure. First, the Invitrogen Protocol was optimized for our goals and tested for DynaBeads decoration with histidine-tagged GFP (Picture 1). </p> | <p>Nevertheless, the surface of DynaBeads can be decorated with His-Tag protein. For the “proof of principle” experiments His-Tag GFP were selected due to its availability and easy imaging procedure. First, the Invitrogen Protocol was optimized for our goals and tested for DynaBeads decoration with histidine-tagged GFP (Picture 1). </p> | ||
<p>To prove the surface of the Dynabeads enveloped to the Peptidosome membrane availability for the decoration the labeling procedure was applied after the Peptidosome formation in both Binding/Wash Buffer and LB media (Picture 2). </p> | <p>To prove the surface of the Dynabeads enveloped to the Peptidosome membrane availability for the decoration the labeling procedure was applied after the Peptidosome formation in both Binding/Wash Buffer and LB media (Picture 2). </p> | ||
− | <p>In conclusion, here we proved the possibility of Peptidosome surface decoration with histidine-tagged molecules that can be used for various applications where enzymatic activity of the surface of Peptidosome or Peptidosome immobilization is required. Surface decoration protocol is compatible with almost any goals due to its flexibility, as the | + | <p>In conclusion, here we proved the possibility of Peptidosome surface decoration with histidine-tagged molecules that can be used for various applications where enzymatic activity of the surface of Peptidosome or Peptidosome immobilization is required. Surface decoration protocol is compatible with almost any goals due to its flexibility, as the decoration procedure can be performed before and after Peptidosome formation in the specific Binding/Washing buffer or just in the LB media. </p> |
− | decoration procedure can be performed before and after Peptidosome formation in the specific Binding/Washing buffer or just in the LB media. </p> | + | |
Revision as of 19:29, 30 October 2017