Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
<p>With a really straight forward experiment, including the help of the pH-indicator we were able to prove that a diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the surrounding environment is possible. We transferred Peptidosomes to water or LB-Media and measured the time it took for the colour to disappear, or in other words, the time it takes for the coloured solution inside the cage to diffuse out of it. </p> | <p>With a really straight forward experiment, including the help of the pH-indicator we were able to prove that a diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the surrounding environment is possible. We transferred Peptidosomes to water or LB-Media and measured the time it took for the colour to disappear, or in other words, the time it takes for the coloured solution inside the cage to diffuse out of it. </p> | ||
<p>Proving that diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the environment is possible, we wanted to know next if diffusion between two peptidosomes which are in direct contact is possible. For this experiment only one of the two connected peptidosomes contained coloured solution. Over the lapse of around 1.5 hours, it was possible to observe how the colour was disseminating to the non-coloured peptidosome until it reached an equilibrium (Figure X), proving that there is diffusion, or intercommunication, between the two peptidosomes. </p> | <p>Proving that diffusion between the inside of the peptidosome and the environment is possible, we wanted to know next if diffusion between two peptidosomes which are in direct contact is possible. For this experiment only one of the two connected peptidosomes contained coloured solution. Over the lapse of around 1.5 hours, it was possible to observe how the colour was disseminating to the non-coloured peptidosome until it reached an equilibrium (Figure X), proving that there is diffusion, or intercommunication, between the two peptidosomes. </p> | ||
− | <figure> | + | <figure> |
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/97/T--TU_Dresden--diffusion.png" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/97/T--TU_Dresden--diffusion.png" | ||
alt="Diffusion between Peptidosomes" | alt="Diffusion between Peptidosomes" | ||
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
<figcaption><b>Figure 5: Diffusion between Peptidosomes </b> The time sequence of the experiment is shown. The yellow peptidosome (with pH indicator) was fused with an empty peptidosome (transparent) and the change was then observed over time (1.5 h).</figcaption> | <figcaption><b>Figure 5: Diffusion between Peptidosomes </b> The time sequence of the experiment is shown. The yellow peptidosome (with pH indicator) was fused with an empty peptidosome (transparent) and the change was then observed over time (1.5 h).</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <p>Additionally, to the previous described method, we used a microinjection-technique to inject a coloured solution to the inside of the peptidosome (figure XXX). To close the hole that was probably opened on the membrane by the introducing the glass capillary, the peptidosome was exposed again for 5 min to | + | <p>Additionally, to the previous described method, we used a microinjection-technique to inject a coloured solution to the inside of the peptidosome (figure XXX). To close the hole that was probably opened on the membrane by the introducing the glass capillary, the peptidosome was exposed again for 5 min to CO<sub>2</sub>. Afterwards it was transferred to water. As shown in figure XXX D) the peptidosome was stable. </p> |
<figure> | <figure> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/be/T--TU_Dresden--microinjection.png" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/be/T--TU_Dresden--microinjection.png" | ||
Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
<figcaption><b>Figure 8: Plate reader assay, well scan mode </b> Well A6 is shown here as an example for a measurement in which no signal could be detected, which is why the entire matrix is colored green.</figcaption> | <figcaption><b>Figure 8: Plate reader assay, well scan mode </b> Well A6 is shown here as an example for a measurement in which no signal could be detected, which is why the entire matrix is colored green.</figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>In figure X examples of the well scans of different samples are displayed.</p> | ||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <img src="" | ||
+ | alt="Overview Well-scans of the Plate Reader Assay " | ||
+ | class="zoom"> | ||
+ | <figcaption><b>Figure 9: Overview of well-scans of the Plate Reader Assay e </b> The results of the well-scan measurements for the detection of fluorescence and luminescence are shown. If no signal is detected, the field of the matrix is green, otherwise red.</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p>The well scan maps appear completely green where fluorescence/luminescence is absent, i.e. water and empty peptidosome. Wells containing a sample of the day culture and lyophilized eGFP solved in water show a red colour in the whole map. However, a localized red spot over a green background is observed where the source of fluorescence/luminescence is contained: the cells trapped inside the peptidosomes. This shows that when the peptidosome with cells inside is transferred to water, bacteria cannot diffuse away, but its kept contained within the structure, resulting in a localized red signal. </p> | <p>The well scan maps appear completely green where fluorescence/luminescence is absent, i.e. water and empty peptidosome. Wells containing a sample of the day culture and lyophilized eGFP solved in water show a red colour in the whole map. However, a localized red spot over a green background is observed where the source of fluorescence/luminescence is contained: the cells trapped inside the peptidosomes. This shows that when the peptidosome with cells inside is transferred to water, bacteria cannot diffuse away, but its kept contained within the structure, resulting in a localized red signal. </p> | ||
<h4> Fluorescence microscopy</h4> | <h4> Fluorescence microscopy</h4> | ||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <figure class="makeresponsive floatleft" style="width: 50%;"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/ca/T--TU_Dresden--stereo.png" | ||
+ | alt="Peptidosome with encapsulated fluorescent bacteria" | ||
+ | class="zoom"> | ||
+ | <figcaption><b>Figure X: Peptidosome with encapsulated fluorescent bacteria </b> The picture shows a peptidosome with a high bacterial concentration of the strain expressing sfGFP. The representation is made in false colors, processed with the program ImageJ.</figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
<p>The encapsulation of B. subtitilis expressing sfGFP in a constitutive way was also demonstrated by the fluorescence microscopy. In this experiment, the bacteria were encapsulated as described. As seen in Figure X, the peptidosome emitted green light what proved the existence of sfGFP-expressing bacteria. </p> | <p>The encapsulation of B. subtitilis expressing sfGFP in a constitutive way was also demonstrated by the fluorescence microscopy. In this experiment, the bacteria were encapsulated as described. As seen in Figure X, the peptidosome emitted green light what proved the existence of sfGFP-expressing bacteria. </p> | ||
Line 195: | Line 210: | ||
<p>When performing that experiment, we discovered bacterial growth in the supernatant where the peptidosomes were incubated. To figure out the reason for this, cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy (cryo-SEM) was used to image bacteria-loaded peptidosomes. The results are showed below. </p> | <p>When performing that experiment, we discovered bacterial growth in the supernatant where the peptidosomes were incubated. To figure out the reason for this, cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy (cryo-SEM) was used to image bacteria-loaded peptidosomes. The results are showed below. </p> | ||
− | + | <figure> | |
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/53/T--TU_Dresden--sem1.png" | ||
+ | alt="SEM pictures " | ||
+ | class="zoom"> | ||
+ | <figcaption><b>Figure 9: SEM pictures</b> A) whole peptidosome, B); C); D) Details of the membrane, E); F); G); H) Details of the bacteria in the peptidosome membrane</figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
<p>As observed in the images, some cells are completely or only partially integrated into the membrane, composed by a mesh of fibers. This cells found on the outer surface of the membrane, if released, can be responsible for the bacterial growth on the supernatant. Therefore we designed a second growth experiment, in which also the whole supernatant of each peptidosome was plated with the purpose of observing the amount of bacteria released there. </p> | <p>As observed in the images, some cells are completely or only partially integrated into the membrane, composed by a mesh of fibers. This cells found on the outer surface of the membrane, if released, can be responsible for the bacterial growth on the supernatant. Therefore we designed a second growth experiment, in which also the whole supernatant of each peptidosome was plated with the purpose of observing the amount of bacteria released there. </p> | ||
<p>Two extra treatments were tested, the first one consisted in adding “washing” steps, meaning that the peptidosomes were transferred twice to fresh media before their incubation. We hypothesized that the bacteria on the outer membrane would be released and left behind after the transfers. The second treatment that we tested consisted in pre-incubating the peptidosome in LB broth adjusted to have an acid pH, this with the finality of closing the membrane to entrap even more the cells, triggering the self-assembly of the unreacted Fmoc-FF solution still present in the peptidosome. </p> | <p>Two extra treatments were tested, the first one consisted in adding “washing” steps, meaning that the peptidosomes were transferred twice to fresh media before their incubation. We hypothesized that the bacteria on the outer membrane would be released and left behind after the transfers. The second treatment that we tested consisted in pre-incubating the peptidosome in LB broth adjusted to have an acid pH, this with the finality of closing the membrane to entrap even more the cells, triggering the self-assembly of the unreacted Fmoc-FF solution still present in the peptidosome. </p> | ||
<p>By introducing the treatments, the number of colonies was reduced from several hundreds to an average of .7 for the washing steps and 1.7 for the low pH treatment. After analysing the results, we concluded that the washing steps are important to reduce the number of cells released in the supernatant, whereas the treatment with acid broth does not add a significant effect on this. In that way, by introducing the washing steps and also reducing the concentration of cells in the peptidosomes, the amount of bacteria present on the outer surface of the membrane was importantly diminished, fact that was corroborated by performing a second cryo-SEM and showed below. </p> | <p>By introducing the treatments, the number of colonies was reduced from several hundreds to an average of .7 for the washing steps and 1.7 for the low pH treatment. After analysing the results, we concluded that the washing steps are important to reduce the number of cells released in the supernatant, whereas the treatment with acid broth does not add a significant effect on this. In that way, by introducing the washing steps and also reducing the concentration of cells in the peptidosomes, the amount of bacteria present on the outer surface of the membrane was importantly diminished, fact that was corroborated by performing a second cryo-SEM and showed below. </p> | ||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/ce/T--TU_Dresden--sem2.png" | ||
+ | alt="SEM pictures " | ||
+ | class="zoom"> | ||
+ | <figcaption><b>Figure 10: SEM pictures</b> A), B) Membrane overview C),D) Membrane details; A), C) washings steps B), D) pH treatment </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
<p>In the second measurement the number of detectable bacteria that lie or are integrated on the membrane is significantly lower. Only a few individual fibers are visible and the surface is wrinkled. (figure XX A), B)) </p> | <p>In the second measurement the number of detectable bacteria that lie or are integrated on the membrane is significantly lower. Only a few individual fibers are visible and the surface is wrinkled. (figure XX A), B)) </p> | ||
Line 213: | Line 239: | ||
<p>To prove the surface of the Dynabeads enveloped to the Peptidosome membrane availability for the decoration the labeling procedure was applied after the Peptidosome formation in both Binding/Wash Buffer and LB media (Picture 2). </p> | <p>To prove the surface of the Dynabeads enveloped to the Peptidosome membrane availability for the decoration the labeling procedure was applied after the Peptidosome formation in both Binding/Wash Buffer and LB media (Picture 2). </p> | ||
<p>In conclusion, here we proved the possibility of Peptidosome surface decoration with histidine-tagged molecules that can be used for various applications where enzymatic activity of the surface of Peptidosome or Peptidosome immobilization is required. Surface decoration protocol is compatible with almost any goals due to its flexibility, as the decoration procedure can be performed before and after Peptidosome formation in the specific Binding/Washing buffer or just in the LB media. </p> | <p>In conclusion, here we proved the possibility of Peptidosome surface decoration with histidine-tagged molecules that can be used for various applications where enzymatic activity of the surface of Peptidosome or Peptidosome immobilization is required. Surface decoration protocol is compatible with almost any goals due to its flexibility, as the decoration procedure can be performed before and after Peptidosome formation in the specific Binding/Washing buffer or just in the LB media. </p> | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 22:12, 30 October 2017