Difference between revisions of "Team:TU Dresden/Judging"
Stassoulas (Talk | contribs) |
Stassoulas (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<br><br><br><br> | <br><br><br><br> | ||
Revision as of 16:49, 1 November 2017
Judging
For the iGEM competition, all teams must convince the judges of completing the requirements for achieving bronze, silver or gold. iGEMers register their teams in March and work all summer to check off these requirements and prepare to defend their claims in Boston, at the Hynes Convention Center. Teams also need to complete a poster, wiki page and present at the Giant Jamboree to get a medal as well as complete other tasks. Please see the Judging Criteria, for more information on medals.
Bronze Medal Criteria
Silver Medal Criteria
Gold Medal Criteria
Silver Medal Criteria
The PsrfA and PblaZ promoters are working as expected
Collaborated with another iGEM team in a significant way
We thought critically about the lab project's impact in the community and we engaged this issue creatively
Gold Medal Criteria
Integrated our Human Practices into the design/execution of the lab
Improved the SpyCatcher part
