Line 217: | Line 217: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <h4><i><b> | + | <h4><i><b>B. subtilis</b></i> in Peptidosomes</h4> |
<p>After we have proven that <i>B. subtilis</i> can survive the designed encapsulation process, and that the organism cannot use the building block Fmoc-FF as a nitrogen source, experiments to entrap the bacteria started. </p> | <p>After we have proven that <i>B. subtilis</i> can survive the designed encapsulation process, and that the organism cannot use the building block Fmoc-FF as a nitrogen source, experiments to entrap the bacteria started. </p> | ||
Line 241: | Line 241: | ||
− | <h4 id="microscopy"> Fluorescence microscopy with <i>B. subtilis</i></h4> | + | <h4 id="microscopy"> Fluorescence microscopy with <i><b>B. subtilis</b></i></h4> |
<figure> | <figure> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive floatleft" style="width: 20%;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive floatleft" style="width: 20%;"> | ||
Line 249: | Line 249: | ||
<figcaption><b>Figure 13: Peptidosome with encapsulated fluorescent bacteria </b> Shown is a entire Peptidosome encapsulating <i>B. subtilis</i> expressing sfGFP</figcaption> | <figcaption><b>Figure 13: Peptidosome with encapsulated fluorescent bacteria </b> Shown is a entire Peptidosome encapsulating <i>B. subtilis</i> expressing sfGFP</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <p>Next, we used Fluorescence microscopy to analyse a <i>B. subtilis</i> strain encapsulated in Peptdiosomes, which constitutively expresses sfGFP (Figure 13). We could demonstrate, that the fluorescence signal was restricted to the Peptidosome - standing in line with the results obtained in the well scan experiments. This was the final proof that </p> | + | <p>Next, we used Fluorescence microscopy to analyse a <i>B. subtilis</i> strain encapsulated in Peptdiosomes, which constitutively expresses sfGFP (Figure 13). We could demonstrate, that the fluorescence signal was restricted to the Peptidosome - standing in line with the results obtained in the well scan experiments. This was the final proof that the bacteria are encapsulated in the Peptidosomes and are fully trapped.</p> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Line 255: | Line 255: | ||
<h5 id="growth"> The Growth of <i><b>B.subtilis</b></i> in Peptidosomes</h5> | <h5 id="growth"> The Growth of <i><b>B.subtilis</b></i> in Peptidosomes</h5> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>After we checked the functionality of reporters in Peptidosomes, we were also interested to observe growth of <i>B.subtilis</i> while encapsulated. Since the Peptidosomes should be liquid-filled and allow the exchange of molecules, <i>B.subtilis</i> should be able to grow. To demonstrate this, we loaded Peptidosome with a known amount of bacteria and plated them on agar plates after different time periods of incubation at 37°C. These plates were then incubated over night and we documented the colony numbers on the next day (Table 1). We expected to observe an increase of the colony forming units in correlation of longer incubation times. Peptidosomes plated after 0 hours represent the starting bacterial concentration, as these Peptidosomes were plated on agar plates immediately after their generation.</p> |
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 60%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;""> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 60%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;""> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Table 1: Results growth experiment</b></figcaption> | + | <figcaption><b>Table 1: Results of the growth-test experiment</b></figcaption> |
<table> | <table> | ||
<tr style= "border-bottom: 2px solid; padding:5px;"> | <tr style= "border-bottom: 2px solid; padding:5px;"> | ||
Line 270: | Line 270: | ||
<td style="border-right: 1px solid; padding:5px;">370.67 ± 57.42</td> | <td style="border-right: 1px solid; padding:5px;">370.67 ± 57.42</td> | ||
<td style="border-right: 1px solid; padding:5px;">593.33 ± 74.44 </td> | <td style="border-right: 1px solid; padding:5px;">593.33 ± 74.44 </td> | ||
− | <td style=" padding:5px;""> | + | <td style=" padding:5px;"">lawn </td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
− | <p>As observed on the results, the number of colonies in the plates | + | <p>As observed on the results, the number of colonies in the plates increased after 3.5 h of incubation, when compared to the starting bacterial concentration (0 hours). After 7 hours it was not possible to count the amount of colonies, cause <i>B.subtilis</i> formed a lawn. This clearly showed that <i>B.subtilis</i> was fully capable to grow inside of the Peptidosome cages. Thus, Peptidosomes are indeed suitable for the establishment of bacterial cultures. </p> |
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
− | <h5 id="sem">Cryo- | + | <h5 id="sem">Cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy</h5> |
− | <p> | + | <p>To fully investigate how <i>B.subtilis</i> is encapsulated in the Peptidosomes, we performed Cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy (<b>Cryo-SEM</b>). By doing so, we should get inside if the surface of the Peptidosome is also covered by bacterial cells.</p> |
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
Line 311: | Line 311: | ||
class="makeresponsive zoom"> | class="makeresponsive zoom"> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <figcaption> <b>Figure 14: | + | <figcaption> <b>Figure 14: Cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy pictures</b> <b>A</b> An entire Peptidosome <b>B</b>, <b>C</b> Zoom on the Peptidosome membrane <b>D</b>, <b>E</b>, <b>F</b> Showing bacteria trapped in the Peptidosome membrane </figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
− | <p>As | + | <p>As one can clearly see in the images above, some cells are completely or only partially integrated into the membrane of the Peptidosome (Figure 14, B). These cells, which are found on the outer surface of the membrane, if released, can result in bacterial growth outside of the Peptidosome.</p> |
− | <p> | + | <p>To address this issue, we designed a second growth experiment, in which we also plated the supernatant of each Peptidosome to check the amounts of the "released" bacteria.</p> |
+ | <p>During this experiment two additional counter measurements were implemented, the first one consisted in adding “washing” step, were the Peptidosomes were transferred twice to fresh media before their incubation. We hypothesized that the bacteria on the outer membrane would be released and left behind in the course of the transfers. The second treatment that we tested consisted in pre-incubating of the Peptidosome in LB broth adjusted to an acid pH, this should guarantee an increased closing of the membrane by triggering the self-assembly of the any unreacted Fmoc-FF solution still present in the Peptidosome membrane. </p> | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 60%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 60%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | ||
Line 337: | Line 338: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
− | <p>By introducing the treatments, the number of colonies was reduced from several hundreds to an average of .7 for the washing steps and 1.7 for the low pH treatment. | + | <p>By introducing the treatments, the number of colonies was dramatically reduced from several hundreds to an average of 0.7 for the washing steps and 1.7 for the low pH treatment (Table 2). From here, we concluded that the washing steps are important to reduce the number of cells released in the supernatant, whereas the treatment with acid broth does not add a significant effect on top of this. By introducing the washing steps and also reducing the concentration of cells in the Peptidosomes, the amount of bacteria present on the outer surface of the membrane was dramatically decreased. We also confirmed this by performing a second round of cryo-SEM, showen below. </p> |
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
Line 363: | Line 364: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <figcaption> <b>Figure 15: | + | <figcaption> <b>Figure 15: Cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy pictures</b> Pictures were taken after implementing washing steps (<b>A</b>, <b>C</b>) or pH treatment (<b>B</b>, <b>D</b>) after Peptidosome generation. (A, C) Membrane shown as an overview. (C, D) Membrane shown in more detail. </figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
− | <p>In | + | <p>In this second round of cryo-SEM the number of detectable bacteria that lie or are integrated in the membrane is significantly lower. Only a few individual cells are visible and the surface is less wrinkled. (Figure 15 A), B)) </p> |
− | <p>Only on the Peptidosome with the low pH treatment, a cell that was not integrated in the membrane was observed (D). </p> | + | <p>Only on the Peptidosome with the low pH treatment, a cell that was not integrated in the membrane was observed (Figure 15, D). </p> |
− | <p>The results of the growth experiment with the additional treatments were confirmed microscopically. There was no significant improvement in the Peptidosomes treated with acid LB medium compared to the sole integration of | + | <p>The results of the growth experiment with the additional treatments were confirmed microscopically. There was no significant improvement in the Peptidosomes treated with acid LB medium compared to the sole integration of washing steps. This confirms the reduced number of colonies in the supernatant of the growth experiment when carrying out the additional treatment methods (Table 2 and Figure 15). </p> |
<p>The one loosely attached cell might be a problem for some applications where the surrounding medium is expected to be free of bacteria, therefore, the manufacturing technique of Peptidosomes should be adapted accordingly. An adequate method for this could be introducing the cells by microinjection, since there is not a chance that bacteria can be attached to the outer part of the membrane. </p> | <p>The one loosely attached cell might be a problem for some applications where the surrounding medium is expected to be free of bacteria, therefore, the manufacturing technique of Peptidosomes should be adapted accordingly. An adequate method for this could be introducing the cells by microinjection, since there is not a chance that bacteria can be attached to the outer part of the membrane. </p> | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
− | <h2 id="surface"> 3. Surface | + | <h2 id="surface"> 3. Surface Decoration </h2> |
− | <p>The properties of self-assembled Fmoc-FF membrane allow tiny objects, such as Dynabeads, to be | + | <p>The properties of self-assembled Fmoc-FF membrane allow tiny objects, such as Dynabeads, to be incorporated in the membrane of Peptidosomes. Incorporating Dynabeads enables the control of the Peptidosomes movements in a magnetic field, provides a powerful delivery tool, which can be used in various applications. </p> |
<video src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2c/T--TU_Dresden--magneticpeptidosome.mp4" controls class="makeresponsive" style="padding-left: 10%; padding-right: 10%; width: 90%;" poster= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/99/T--TU_Dresden--magnetosomevideo.png"> | <video src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/2c/T--TU_Dresden--magneticpeptidosome.mp4" controls class="makeresponsive" style="padding-left: 10%; padding-right: 10%; width: 90%;" poster= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/9/99/T--TU_Dresden--magnetosomevideo.png"> | ||
This video is not available for your browser<br/> | This video is not available for your browser<br/> | ||
Line 382: | Line 381: | ||
</video> | </video> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>Moreover, the surface of Dynabeads can be decorated with a His-Tag. For the “proof of principle” experiments His-tagged GFP were selected allowing an easy imaging procedure. First, the Invitrogen protocol was optimized for our goals and tested for Dynabeads decoration with histidine-tagged GFP (Figure 16). </p> |
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 65%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 65%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | ||
Line 388: | Line 387: | ||
alt="Dynabeads labeled with histidine-tagged GFP in the Binding/Wash buffer." | alt="Dynabeads labeled with histidine-tagged GFP in the Binding/Wash buffer." | ||
class="zoom"> | class="zoom"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure 16: Dynabeads labeled with histidine-tagged GFP | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 16: Dynabeads labeled with histidine-tagged GFP. </b> <b>A</b> transmitted light <b>B</b> fluorenscence </figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <p>To prove the surface of the Dynabeads enveloped to the Peptidosome membrane availability for the decoration the labeling procedure was applied after the Peptidosome formation in both | + | <p>To prove the surface of the Dynabeads enveloped to the Peptidosome membrane availability for the decoration the labeling procedure was applied after the Peptidosome formation in both binding/washing buffer and LB media (Figure 17). </p> |
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column;"> | ||
Line 399: | Line 398: | ||
<figcaption><b>Figure 17: Peptidosome with Dynabeads labeled with His-Tag GFP in Binding/Wash Buffer (A) or LB media (B) </b> </figcaption> | <figcaption><b>Figure 17: Peptidosome with Dynabeads labeled with His-Tag GFP in Binding/Wash Buffer (A) or LB media (B) </b> </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>Here, we clearly demonstrated the possibility of Peptidosome surface decoration with histidine-tagged GFP. Hereby the GFP serves as a proof of principle that can be exchanged with any other protein of interest and thus used for various applications where enzymatic activity of the surface of Peptidosome or Peptidosome immobilization is required. Surface decoration protocol is compatible with almost any goals due to its flexibility, as the decoration procedure can be performed before and after Peptidosome generation.</p> |
Revision as of 18:04, 1 November 2017