Difference between revisions of "Team:TU Dresden/Judging"
Stassoulas (Talk | contribs) |
Stassoulas (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
<p>✓ Improved the SpyCatcher part</p> | <p>✓ Improved the SpyCatcher part</p> | ||
<a target="_blank" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2273015" class="info">Read More</a> | <a target="_blank" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2273015" class="info">Read More</a> | ||
| − | <p>✓ We showed, with | + | <p>✓ We showed, with six different subprojects, the capabilities of Peptidosomes in synthetic biology</p> |
<a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Demonstrate" class="info">Read More</a> | <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Dresden/Demonstrate" class="info">Read More</a> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 20:28, 1 November 2017
Judging
For the iGEM competition, all teams must convince the judges of completing the requirements for achieving bronze, silver or gold. iGEMers register their teams in March and work all summer to check off these requirements and prepare to defend their claims in Boston, at the Hynes Convention Center. Teams also need to complete a poster, wiki page and present at the Giant Jamboree to get a medal as well as complete other tasks. Please see the Judging Criteria, for more information on medals.
