Moritz P95 (Talk | contribs) m |
Moritz P95 (Talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<h2>Protein interactions in evolution context</h2> | <h2>Protein interactions in evolution context</h2> | ||
− | The proteome reflects the entirety of proteins that is expressed by a cell or an organism. Most of these proteins do not function alone. Instead, they are dependent on the interactions with a multitude of other proteins to fulfill their functions within the cell. Protein-protein interactions are responsible for almost any kind of cellular processes, such as signal transduction, cell-cell contact, transport, metabolism, cell motion or even antigen-antibody recognition </i><x-ref>Larance.2015</x-ref>. These interactions are enabled by electrostatic forces due to the different chemical characteristics of the amino acids. Nowadays, many biochemical or microscopy-based methods are available to investigate protein-protein interactions, for instance protein complex immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) or yeast two-hybrid screenings. As easy it is to detect a protein-protein interaction, as difficult it is to alter the strength of these interactions, although the magnitude of interaction can influence the cellular outcome, for example a stronger signal transduction or a higher expression rate. Phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE) allows a directed evolution of different kinds of proteins within a few days as it was for example shown for RNA polymerases, proteases or aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases | + | The proteome reflects the entirety of proteins that is expressed by a cell or an organism. Most of these proteins do not function alone. Instead, they are dependent on the interactions with a multitude of other proteins to fulfill their functions within the cell. Protein-protein interactions are responsible for almost any kind of cellular processes, such as signal transduction, cell-cell contact, transport, metabolism, cell motion or even antigen-antibody recognition </i><x-ref>Larance.2015</x-ref>. These interactions are enabled by electrostatic forces due to the different chemical characteristics of the amino acids. Nowadays, many biochemical or microscopy-based methods are available to investigate protein-protein interactions, for instance protein complex immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) or yeast two-hybrid screenings. As easy it is to detect a protein-protein interaction, as difficult it is to alter the strength of these interactions, although the magnitude of interaction can influence the cellular outcome, for example a stronger signal transduction or a higher expression rate. Phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE) allows a directed evolution of different kinds of proteins within a few days as it was for example shown for RNA polymerases, proteases or aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases <x-ref>RN37'</x-ref>,<x-ref>Dickinson.2014</x-ref>,<x-ref>Bryson.2017</x-ref>. Technically, a directed evolution towards a tighter protein-protein interaction is possible as well, as it was shown for the toxin Cry1Ac from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt toxin) that binds a cadherin-like receptor <x-ref>RN120'</x-ref>. |
<h2>Motivation</h2> | <h2>Motivation</h2> | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Based on the paper by Tiyun Han <i>et al.</i><x-ref>Han.2017</x-ref>, we created 4 different split T7 polymerase variants expressed from a ploycistronic expression cassette. In order to make sure, that the activity of our split variants is not due to skipping of a stop codon behind the first fragment and corresponding production of full-length T7 polymerase, located the C-terminal split part to the 5’ end of expression cassette (Figure 2). | Based on the paper by Tiyun Han <i>et al.</i><x-ref>Han.2017</x-ref>, we created 4 different split T7 polymerase variants expressed from a ploycistronic expression cassette. In order to make sure, that the activity of our split variants is not due to skipping of a stop codon behind the first fragment and corresponding production of full-length T7 polymerase, located the C-terminal split part to the 5’ end of expression cassette (Figure 2). | ||
− | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 46: | Line 45: | ||
Applying our phage production toolbox standard, we then produced geneIII-deficient M13 phages encoding the different T7 split variants as well as a full-length T7 as control. Next, we generated a corresponding E. coli selection strain transformed with an accessory plasmid expressing gene III form a T7 promoter. Hence, only phages encoding function split T7 variants would be able to activate expression of gene III an propagate (Figure 3). | Applying our phage production toolbox standard, we then produced geneIII-deficient M13 phages encoding the different T7 split variants as well as a full-length T7 as control. Next, we generated a corresponding E. coli selection strain transformed with an accessory plasmid expressing gene III form a T7 promoter. Hence, only phages encoding function split T7 variants would be able to activate expression of gene III an propagate (Figure 3). | ||
+ | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Contentsection|{{#tag:html| | ||
+ | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ed/Pi_pace_fragments-01-01.jpg|Figure 2: Split T7 polymerase variants generated in course of this project.|Numbers correspond to amino acid position with respect to the full-length T7 polymerase protein.|}} | ||
{{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/cf/T--Heidelberg--AP_PI_Pace-01.jpg|Figure 3: Creating a selection circuit linking (split) T7 polymerase activity to phage propagation. |The E. coli selection strain carries an accessory plasmid encoding gene III driven from a T7 promoter. Therefore, only phages encoding a functional T7 polymerase are able to propagate efficiently on the selection strain. |}} | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagebox|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/cf/T--Heidelberg--AP_PI_Pace-01.jpg|Figure 3: Creating a selection circuit linking (split) T7 polymerase activity to phage propagation. |The E. coli selection strain carries an accessory plasmid encoding gene III driven from a T7 promoter. Therefore, only phages encoding a functional T7 polymerase are able to propagate efficiently on the selection strain. |}} | ||
+ | }}}} | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
To validate, if our selection circuit is working, we infected the aforementioned E. coli selection cells with at identical multiplicity-of-infection (MOI) with the different Split-T7 encoding phage variants as well as the full-length T7 control phage (Figure 4). | To validate, if our selection circuit is working, we infected the aforementioned E. coli selection cells with at identical multiplicity-of-infection (MOI) with the different Split-T7 encoding phage variants as well as the full-length T7 control phage (Figure 4). | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a1/T--Heidelberg--Pi_pace_propagation-test.png|Figure 4: Single-round propagation of M13 phages encoding the indicated split T7 polymerase variant (see Figure 2) or a full-length T7 as control. | The propagation factor corresponds to the fold increase in phage titer ascompared to the used inoculation titer. Data are means +/- standard deviation, 3 replicates. |}} | ||
− | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 66: | Line 69: | ||
Due to the highly efficient propagation of our phage encoding the T7 split at residue 565/564, we sought out to take the challenge of using our PACE apparatus and corresponding continuous flow setup for the final evolution experiment to further improve this split T7 variant. Details are described on the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Heidelberg/Pace">PACE page</a>. In brief, we created a mutagentic selection strain by co-transforming mutagenesis-inducing plasmid MP4 (Badran et al, Nature Communication, 2015) and our pT7-geneIII accessory plasmid. Phages were propagated for 3 days with a flow rate of 1 lagoon volume/hour, followed by plague assays. The split T7 fragment of 5 clonal plagues was then amplified by PCR and sanger-sequenced. As hoped, we observed a recurrent, coding mutation (T877P) present in three out of the five sequenced split T7 variants (Figure 5). | Due to the highly efficient propagation of our phage encoding the T7 split at residue 565/564, we sought out to take the challenge of using our PACE apparatus and corresponding continuous flow setup for the final evolution experiment to further improve this split T7 variant. Details are described on the <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Heidelberg/Pace">PACE page</a>. In brief, we created a mutagentic selection strain by co-transforming mutagenesis-inducing plasmid MP4 (Badran et al, Nature Communication, 2015) and our pT7-geneIII accessory plasmid. Phages were propagated for 3 days with a flow rate of 1 lagoon volume/hour, followed by plague assays. The split T7 fragment of 5 clonal plagues was then amplified by PCR and sanger-sequenced. As hoped, we observed a recurrent, coding mutation (T877P) present in three out of the five sequenced split T7 variants (Figure 5). | ||
− | {{Heidelberg/templateus/ | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fb/T--Heidelberg--PI_Pace_Mutation_overview.png|Figure 5: Mutational pattern of the evolved split T7 variant.|Following three days of in vivo evolution with PACE (Link PACE page), a plague assay |
was performed and the split T7 insert of five individual phage clones was analyzed by sanger-sequencing. We observed a recurrent mutation (T877P) in three out of the five clones, suggesting an evolutionary advantage (i.e. increased fitness) of the corresponding split T7 mutant as compared its non-mutated counterpart. |}} | was performed and the split T7 insert of five individual phage clones was analyzed by sanger-sequencing. We observed a recurrent mutation (T877P) in three out of the five clones, suggesting an evolutionary advantage (i.e. increased fitness) of the corresponding split T7 mutant as compared its non-mutated counterpart. |}} | ||
Line 72: | Line 75: | ||
Interestingly this residue is located very close to the interaction surface of the two split T7 domains, suggesting a possible role in T7 auto-reassembly (Figure 6). | Interestingly this residue is located very close to the interaction surface of the two split T7 domains, suggesting a possible role in T7 auto-reassembly (Figure 6). | ||
− | {{Heidelberg/templateus/ | + | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Imagesection|https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/da/T--Heidelberg--PI_pace_structure.png|Figure 6: Structure of T7 polymerase. |The color coding corresponds to the T7 split at residues 564/565 in Figure 2. Cyan color indicates the N-terminal split domain, blue the C-terminal split domain. Residue T877 is stained in red. |}} |
− | + | }}}} | |
+ | {{Heidelberg/templateus/Contentsection|{{#tag:html| | ||
<h1>Discussion</h1> | <h1>Discussion</h1> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:38, 1 November 2017
Protein Interaction
Improving Split Protein Auto-Reassembly
Introduction
Protein interactions in evolution context
The proteome reflects the entirety of proteins that is expressed by a cell or an organism. Most of these proteins do not function alone. Instead, they are dependent on the interactions with a multitude of other proteins to fulfill their functions within the cell. Protein-protein interactions are responsible for almost any kind of cellular processes, such as signal transduction, cell-cell contact, transport, metabolism, cell motion or even antigen-antibody recognitionMotivation
A special type of a protein-protein interaction are split enzymes that allow an auto-reassembly. They usually consist of two enzyme fragments (an N‑terminal and C‑terminal fragment) that are expressed separately, and fuse post translation. This protein fragment complementation is advantageous for any kind of application where the size of an expression cassette is a limiting factor, for instance for the packaging of DNA into virus capsids. For many enzymes auto-reassembly split sites are known, however the efficiency of the joined fragments usually does not reach wildtype efficiency, as it was shown for Cas9 enzymesResults
Based on the paper by Tiyun Han et al.Applying our phage production toolbox standard, we then produced geneIII-deficient M13 phages encoding the different T7 split variants as well as a full-length T7 as control. Next, we generated a corresponding E. coli selection strain transformed with an accessory plasmid expressing gene III form a T7 promoter. Hence, only phages encoding function split T7 variants would be able to activate expression of gene III an propagate (Figure 3).
To validate, if our selection circuit is working, we infected the aforementioned E. coli selection cells with at identical multiplicity-of-infection (MOI) with the different Split-T7 encoding phage variants as well as the full-length T7 control phage (Figure 4).
As hoped, all phages were able to propagate on the selection strain, albeit to different degrees. Remarkably, the degree of phage propagation almost perfectly represented the efficiency of the underlying split T7 variants as reported by Tiyun Han et al.
Importantly, the full-length T7 polymerase control phage was weaker as compared to all split variants in this particular experiment. A possible explanation for this seemingly contradictory observation is, that the split T7 variants might be simply more quickly and efficiently translated (due to the smaller size of the two split T7 polypeptides as compared to the full-length T7 and the presence of individual RBSs driving translation). While this expression kinetics effect might average out in long-term experiments running over several hours, it certainly has a major impact in context of this PREDCEL experiment, where phage propagation time is limited to 1 h.
Due to the highly efficient propagation of our phage encoding the T7 split at residue 565/564, we sought out to take the challenge of using our PACE apparatus and corresponding continuous flow setup for the final evolution experiment to further improve this split T7 variant. Details are described on the PACE page. In brief, we created a mutagentic selection strain by co-transforming mutagenesis-inducing plasmid MP4 (Badran et al, Nature Communication, 2015) and our pT7-geneIII accessory plasmid. Phages were propagated for 3 days with a flow rate of 1 lagoon volume/hour, followed by plague assays. The split T7 fragment of 5 clonal plagues was then amplified by PCR and sanger-sequenced. As hoped, we observed a recurrent, coding mutation (T877P) present in three out of the five sequenced split T7 variants (Figure 5).
Interestingly this residue is located very close to the interaction surface of the two split T7 domains, suggesting a possible role in T7 auto-reassembly (Figure 6).
Discussion
Here, we employed our evolution toolbox to engineer split T7 polymerase variants with improved efficiency due to improved auto-reassembly capability. Therefore, we generated split T7 encoding, gene III deficient M13 phages and propagated them on corresponding, mutagenic selection cells carrying encoding a pT7-geneIII accessory plasmid. After three days of continuous evolution in PACE, we observed a recurrent point mutation (T877P) in three out of five analyzed plagues. This striking result suggests a strong evolutionary advantage of the T877P mutant, split T7 encoding phages as compared to their wild type counterparts.Although we can at this point not precisely elucidate the mechanism, by which this mutation improves the T7 function, our structural analysis indicates that the T877P mutation is located right at the interface of the split T7 domains. More precisely, the mutation is located at the C-terminal end of the C-terminal T7 helix. It is particularly interesting to note, that the threonine to proline mutation will likely affect the helical conformation, as proline has the lowest helix propensity of all amino acids. At this point we can only speculate, that the induced change in conformation may improve non-covalent interactions of amino acids located close at the split interface close to the mutated site.
To characterize our wild type split T7 and improved split T7 (T877P mutant) in further detail, we plan to clone these variants onto regular plasmid and compare their ability to activate T7-driven fluorescence or luminescence reporters.
Taken together, our results demonstrate the successful application of our in vivo directed evolution toolbox for improving protein-protein interactions, as demonstrated here for auto-reassembly of split T7 polymerase.