Introduction
As contribution to this years iGEM Goes Green study hosted by the iGEM Team Dresden, we designed a model that provided us and will provide the iGEM community with a versatile tool to minimize the amount of medium used in the process of operating Phage-Assisted Continuous Evolution (PACE) to develop enhanced proteins. With the help of this model, it is possible for everyone to calculate the appropriate amount of medium that is needed to operate a successful implementation by tuning all parameters. We also provide information about PACE applications conducted in the past.Medium consumption model
PACE usually consumes an extraordinary amount of medium per experiment. This is due to the need for a continuous supply of host cells with a constant cell density. This can be achieved either by using a turbidostat or a chemostat. Here we provide a tool to both the community and ourselves to calculate medium consumption based on different tunable parameters of PACE. We also want to gain an understanding of how we can reduce the amount of medium needed for an experiment. Medium consumption is critical when it comes to the energy needed for an experiment especially when thinking about the amount of energy autoclaving consumes. In a turbidostat, the cell density is held constant by adjusting the medium influx to the cell density. That means the growth of the cells is not affected, instead, every new cell emerges one is put to the waste. In a Chemostat, the cell density is controlled by adjusting the influx of an essential nutrient to the cell density, which limits the growth of the culture. This may cause the host cells to be less efficient in producing the proteins needed for PACE and replicating the phage genome. Additionally, there is a constant efflux from the chemostat to the lagoons, that compensates the growth of the cells. Currently, we are using a turbidostat, probably PACE works better when the E. coli cells are allowed to grow at their maximum speed under the given conditions. So their ability to produce phage as fast as possible is not impaired. Calculation of the flow through in a turbidostat: $$ \frac{\partial V_{M} }{\partial t} = \Phi_{T} = \frac{log(2)}{t_{E} } \cdot V_{T} $$Table 1: Additional Variables and Parameters used in the numeric solution of the model List of all additional paramters and variables used in the numeric solution of this model. When possible values are given.
Symbol | Value and Unit | Explanation |
---|---|---|
\(V_{T}\) | [ml] | Volume of Turbidostat |
\(V_{M}\) | [ml] | Volume of Medium consumed |
\(t_{E} \) | [min] | E. coli generation time |
\(\Phi_{T}\) | [ml/h] | Flow rate through turbidostat |
\(t_{max}\) | [min] | Duration of the experiment |
Your experiment
You can annotate a point in the heat map by providing its coordinates \(t_{max}\) and \(\Phi_{T}\) or \(V_{T}\) and its name. If you have a turbidostat, the value for the flow rate \(\Phi_{T}\) is ignored, if you have a chemostat, the volume \(V_{T}\) is ignored. For the calculation of the flow through of the turbidostat, the value for generation time from the form above is used. Enter your specifications:Minmal Turbidostat Volume
Larger turbidostats or chemostats with a larger flow needs more medium for the same duration than smaller ones. When working with the minimal required volume or flow you can save medium and thus energy. The minimal flow that is required can be calculated using $$ V_{T} = b \cdot V_{L} \cdot N_{L} \cdot \Phi_{L} $$ In case of fluctuations in the generation time of the E. coli cells it is crucial to have a buffer so that the turbidostat is not diluted when the culture grows slower. We currently use a buffer of 50 %, so \(b\) is set to \(1.5\). For a turbidostat, the volume can be calculated from the flow using $$ V_{T} = \Phi_{T} \cdot \frac{t_{E} }{log(2)} $$ The calculation is based on whether turbidostat or chemostat is picked above.Table 2: Additional Variables and Parameters used for this calculation List of all additional paramters and variables used in the numeric solution of this model. When possible values are given.
Symbol | Value and Unit | Explanation |
---|---|---|
\(V_{L}\) | [ml] | Volume of Lagoons |
\(N_{L}\) | Number of Lagoons | |
\(\Phi_{L}\) | [ml/min] | E. coli generation time |
\(b\) | \(1.5\) | Buffer |
Minimal Lagoon Volume
Obviously smaller lagoons require smaller turbidostats or chemostats with a lower flow rate and are therefore saving medium. However, there is a lower limit to lagoon size, if the phage population is too small, the sequence space that can be covered is insufficient to find variants that are better than previous ones. Lagoon sizes used by other vary from 15 mlTable 3: Additional Variables and Parameters used for this calculation List of all additional paramters and variables used in the numeric solution of this model. When possible values are given.
Symbol | Value and Unit | Explanation |
---|---|---|
\(N_{P}\) | [pfu] | Amount of phages per lagoon |
\(c_{P}\) | [pfu/ml] | Phage concentration |
\(L_{S}\) | [bp] | Sequence length in basepairs |
\(L_{T}\) | [bp] | Total sequence length in basepairs in lagoon |
\(N_{M}\) | Number of mutations | |
\(r_{M}\) | [1/generation] | Number of mutated basepairs per basepair per generation |
\(n\) | [bp] | Number of mutated basepairs |
\(M_{n}\) | Number of real sequences with \(n\) mutations | |
\(N_{n}\) | Number of possible sequences with \(n\) mutations | |
\(t\) | Theortical coverage of double |