Difference between revisions of "Team:Aachen/Applied Design"

The theoretical approach of reverse osmosis is rather simple: A high external pressure is applied to the contaminated solution resulting in water moving to the permeate side while diluted substances even on molecular basis are hold back. Since this application is used in an extensive way worldwide, it is necessary to talk about this method in detail. We want to showcase some of the disadvantages of reverse osmosis and some applications where reverse osmosis might not be a good method to clean water from certain contaminants. Summed up, there are three main disadvantages to reverse osmosis:

Reverse Osmosis plant

1. Energy consumption and Maintenance

Energy consumption and maintenance are responsible for up to 95% of the running costs of a reverse osmosis plant [1]. Not considered in this are the high building costs of such a plant. Most plants experience severe maintenance problems caused by fouling or breakage of pumps and compressors [1]. As a result most plants run with only 40-80% of their maximum performance and cause increasing water costs due to low productivity [1]. When plants struggle with their productivity production costs for water can rise up to more than $3.50/m³ [1]. A water distributor in Aachen, as a comparison, produces its drinking water from surface water with production costs of $0.8/m³.

2. Desalination

Reverse osmosis guarantees complete purification of water from solvents, making it best suited for seawater desalination. However, water, free from every solvent is not needed for ecological applications. Therefore, important ions and solvents are resolved in the right concentrations after treatment, making reverse osmosis unspecific and the application inefficient. Organisms on the other hand express highly specific transporters, making our Salt Vaults specific for differing ions. In conclusion, resolving of solvents needed for households or agriculture is not needed, making the process significantly more straight-lined.

3. Effluents

Reverse osmosis plants consist of multiple treatment steps that all produce different effluents. The biggest part of these effluents is the concentrate from the reverse osmosis lines [2]. Its volume is huge and varies between 40 and 60% of the feed flow rate [2]. Resulting from the principle of reverse osmosis, the concentrate has a highly increased salt load (up to 9g/l of chloride [3]) making its discharge, at least in the inland, complicated and expensive. As reverse osmosis is commonly used in salt water desalination plants at the coast it is obvious to discharge the salt concentrate back into the marine environment without treating it, which was the common method for many years [3]. This practice has been clearly linked to a list of detrimental effects on some of the ecosystems around the outlets of the salt concentrate [4], like massive losses of coral, plankton and fish in regions of the red sea [5] or reductions in the abundance of plankton, sessile invertebrates and echinoderms [6]. Because of these negative effects the concentrates are a potentially serious threat to marine ecosystem making environmentally friendly alternatives necessary [3,2].

At the moment it is established to dilute these concentrates with other waste water to lower the salt concentration [2,4]. But there are also problems with chemical burden from agents to enhance flocculation, prevent foaming or to avoid membrane deterioration [7].

When reverse osmotic plants are located inland there is no possibility to pump the concentrate into seawater, making it even more complicated to discharge it [3]. The cost of this process increases the total production costs for inland desalination plants up to 33%, making it an inefficient solution for e.g. industries or municipal sewage treatment plants [8,9]. There are alternative possibilities to discharge the concentrate into the sea but these methods often have low productivity, need high chemical dosages and have high investment costs combined with high energy consumption [3].

References

[1] A. Cipollina, G. Micale, and L. Rizzuti, “A critical assessment of desalination operations in Sicily,” Desalination, vol. 182, 1-3, pp. 1–12, 2005.

[2] G. Mauguin and P. Corsin, “Concentrate and other waste disposals from SWRO plants: Characterization and reduction of their environmental impact,” Desalination, vol. 182, 1-3, pp. 355–364, 2005.

[3] A. Pérez-González, A. M. Urtiaga, R. Ibáñez et al., “State of the art and review on the treatment technologies of water reverse osmosis concentrates,” Water research, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 267–283, 2012.

[4] D. A. Roberts, E. L. Johnston, and N. A. Knott, “Impacts of desalination plant discharges on the marine environment: A critical review of published studies,” Water research, vol. 44, no. 18, pp. 5117–5128, 2010.

[5] B. Mabrook, “Environmental impact of waste brine disposal of desalination plants, Red Sea, Egypt,” Desalination, vol. 97, 1-3, pp. 453–465, 1994.

[6] R. H. Chesher, “Chapter 6. Biological Impact of a Large-Scale Desalination Plant at Key West, Florida,” in Tropical marine pollution, E. J. F. Wood, Ed., vol. 12, pp. 99–153, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1975.

[7] G. L. Meerganz von Medeazza, ““Direct” and socially-induced environmental impacts of desalination,” Desalination, vol. 185, 1-3, pp. 57–70, 2005.

[8] M. Ahmed, W. H. Shayya, D. Hoey et al., “Brine disposal from reverse osmosis desalination plants in Oman and the United Arab Emirates,” Desalination, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 135–147, 2001.

[9] J. M. Arnal, M. Sancho, I. Iborra et al., “Concentration of brines from RO desalination plants by natural evaporation,” Desalination, vol. 182, 1-3, pp. 435–439, 2005.

We conducted measurements of the salt uptake capabilities of different mutants by inoculating a diluted pre-culture in growth medium containing 0.6 M of NaCl. The mutants which showed high ion uptake did not show significant growth. In application, a preculture has to be inoculated separately before desalinization of wastewater, which means another installation for breeding the preculture has to be built. Nevertheless, the yeast is a self- renewing desalination method, which has low maintenance costs. In comparison to the maintenance-intensive reverse osmosis, this depicts another advantage.

The relative cell mass over time measured by a growth profiler 960 (EnzyScreen) in 0,6 M NaCl YPDGal.

A specific nutrition-plan is important to check if by-products of industrial processes could be reused or external sugar must be bought from food industry. The cooperation with Sitech has shown that industrial wastewater treatment plants buy cheap sugar from food industry to feed their bacterial mix and do not assume it to be a big cost factor. (Link: NL) Use of a C-source which is by-product of a corresponding industrial process is an optimal solution to confirm the general trend of industries towards a recycling economy.

In conventional plants the bacterial sludge is drained and fouled in fouling towers over weeks. There, methane is produced, which can be transferred into electrical energy. A wastewater treatment plant like the one in Düren, Germany, is capable of producing up to 60% of their energy household with fouling. (See Sewage Treatment plant)

Yeast is an optimal nutrient for these bacteria. Cases in wastewater treatment plants in Germany have shown that yeast added to the fouling tower significantly enhanced the energy production. We take advantage of the high nutritional value of Salt Vaults to enhance energy production. Substances like H₂S disturb the gas production of bacteria, NaCl or heavy metals on the other side do not have impact on the fouling. These effects support our application for enhanced energy production. However, with our vision of microbial supercollectors for various kinds of pollutants, the possibility of fouling should be discussed for every specific kind of pollutant.

Most wastewater treatment plants, like the one in Aachen (Link: IHP sewage treatment plant), have traces of heavy metals in their fouling sludge, therefore the sludge is burned after fouling. Industrial plants, like the one at the Chemelot Industrial Site in the Netherlands (Link: sewage treatment plant) burn the sludge directly without fouling, telling us that burning is a well-established method to handle the cells after water treatment. Burning of Salt Vaults leaves behind dry salt. This salt, like heavy metals, has to be stored permanently after burning. Depending on the purity of the salt, it could be re-used for industrial processes. An example is chloride chemistry, where chloride is needed as a central molecule.