To test if the ibpa promoter actually promotes GFP expression dependent on the temperature, we observed bacterial cultures harboring the expression vector at different temperatures over time. Diagram A in figure 1 shows the fluorescence intensity we measured all 15 minutes over 6 hours. Cultivation at 28°C leads to a very slow but steady increase in fluorescence intensity, whereas cultivation at 37°C results in a fast and steady increase in fluorescence intensity. For comparison of the different samples, we also divided the value for each sample’s fluorescence intensity by its respective OD600 (= relative fluorescence) to take the cell growth into account. The results are shown in diagram B in figure 1. The bacterial culture showed a decrease in relative fluorescence, when cultivated at 28°C throughout the whole experiment, down to a base level of fluorescence (blue line). When cultivated at 37°C, we measured a small decrease for the first hour and afterwards a strong increase of relative fluorescence with time (yellow line). When the temperature was changed to 37°C after three hours of incubation at 28°C, the relative fluorescence started to rise significantly within less than an hour (blue line). When lowered to 28°C from 37°C the intensity of relative fluorescence decreases (grey line).

The change in relative fluorescence with change of temperature indicates that the construct is responding to induction by increase in temperature. When incubated at 37°C, there was a strong increase in overall and relative fluorescence. This result confirms the induction of the ibpa promoter by heat. However, it was also shown that it took some time for the bacteria to adapt to the altered temperature, until a change in fluorescence could be observed. If the culture had already been incubated in the cultivation flask for 3 hours at 28°C, a subsequent rise in temperature to 37°C led to a strong increase in fluorescence within less than an hour. It must be noted though, that the cultivation flasks had to be taken out of the incubator for a short amount of time every 15 minutes to take the samples for the measurement of the fluorescence, which might have interfered with GFP production. To further shorten the time span needed for induction of the ibpa promoter, it would be beneficial to test the expression construct at even higher temperatures. In this case, it would be especially important to keep an eye on cell growth as E. coli wouldn’t tolerate growing under extreme heat shock conditions for an unlimited amount of time. Additionally, in some circumstances it might be possible to further improve the promoter in the future via site-directed mutagenesis. Moreover it could be shown that a decrease in temperature from 37°C to 28°C led to inhibition of the ibpa promoter and consequently the production of fluorescence protein nearly stopped. The reduction of GFP expression happened already shortly after the temperature was reduced, within about 15 minutes. Although the GFP production clearly dropped, when the cultures were incubated at 28°C, there was still a small level of expression. However, in relation to the cell density measured by OD600, the fluorescence significantly decreased. After all, this relative fluorescence acted as the signal that was detected and processed by the associated communication devices.