Difference between revisions of "Team:Edinburgh OG/Results/Lambda"
(Created page with "{{Edinburgh_OG}} <html> <div class="column full_size"> <a class="btn-back" data-wow-delay=".9s" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh_OG/Results" style="visibility: vis...") |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<div class="column full_size"> | <div class="column full_size"> | ||
<a class="btn-back" data-wow-delay=".9s" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh_OG/Results" style="visibility: visible; animation-delay: 0.9s;">Back to results</a> | <a class="btn-back" data-wow-delay=".9s" href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh_OG/Results" style="visibility: visible; animation-delay: 0.9s;">Back to results</a> | ||
| − | <h1 class="subtitle text-center">Production of | + | <h1 class="subtitle text-center">Production of Lambda phage with SaCas9/FnCpf1</h1> |
<p>Electroporation was used to introduce the engineered λ (SaCas9-λ and FnCpf1-λ) into our testing <em>E. coli </em>platform (MoClo). The electroporation was optimised beforehand by varying the voltage, incubation period, exposure time, media but none of them resulted in an optimisation of the technique. During the electroporation optimisation with λ (not engineered), a single plaque was found in different replicates/optimisation steps (Figure 1) suggesting the inconsistency of the technique. When performing the electroporation with both the engineered λ, no viable recombinant phages were obtained and this part of the project could not be completed. The overall failure of the electroporation was probably due to the presence of active restriction systems in <em>E. coli</em> JM1 which destroyed the λ genome upon infection. Moreover, λ purchased was produced from a different strain of <em>E. coli </em>(GM33). Phages are sensible to the change of host and different chassis can be incompatible. Finally, the JM1 strain carries several mutations which make this strain fragile thus hindering the capability to uptake DNA and produce exogenous proteins.</p> | <p>Electroporation was used to introduce the engineered λ (SaCas9-λ and FnCpf1-λ) into our testing <em>E. coli </em>platform (MoClo). The electroporation was optimised beforehand by varying the voltage, incubation period, exposure time, media but none of them resulted in an optimisation of the technique. During the electroporation optimisation with λ (not engineered), a single plaque was found in different replicates/optimisation steps (Figure 1) suggesting the inconsistency of the technique. When performing the electroporation with both the engineered λ, no viable recombinant phages were obtained and this part of the project could not be completed. The overall failure of the electroporation was probably due to the presence of active restriction systems in <em>E. coli</em> JM1 which destroyed the λ genome upon infection. Moreover, λ purchased was produced from a different strain of <em>E. coli </em>(GM33). Phages are sensible to the change of host and different chassis can be incompatible. Finally, the JM1 strain carries several mutations which make this strain fragile thus hindering the capability to uptake DNA and produce exogenous proteins.</p> | ||
<div class="div-fig" style="width:800px;"> | <div class="div-fig" style="width:800px;"> | ||
Revision as of 09:41, 1 November 2017
Production of Lambda phage with SaCas9/FnCpf1
Electroporation was used to introduce the engineered λ (SaCas9-λ and FnCpf1-λ) into our testing E. coli platform (MoClo). The electroporation was optimised beforehand by varying the voltage, incubation period, exposure time, media but none of them resulted in an optimisation of the technique. During the electroporation optimisation with λ (not engineered), a single plaque was found in different replicates/optimisation steps (Figure 1) suggesting the inconsistency of the technique. When performing the electroporation with both the engineered λ, no viable recombinant phages were obtained and this part of the project could not be completed. The overall failure of the electroporation was probably due to the presence of active restriction systems in E. coli JM1 which destroyed the λ genome upon infection. Moreover, λ purchased was produced from a different strain of E. coli (GM33). Phages are sensible to the change of host and different chassis can be incompatible. Finally, the JM1 strain carries several mutations which make this strain fragile thus hindering the capability to uptake DNA and produce exogenous proteins.
Figure 1: Electroporation optimisation: only one plaque (red circle) was found in two conditions (1.5 kV - plate 1- and 1.75 kV - plate 2)
Want more results?
