Team:CPU CHINA/Results


The construction and expressing validation of SynNotch and CAR system

To engineer our regulatory T cells, we designed a three-plasmid expressing system for genes of SynNotch and CAR. We chose PLVX-IRES-Puro, PLVX-IRES-Neo and pcDNA3.1 as backbones for the plasmid vectors that carry the SynNotch fusion protein gene, the CAR-CD20 fusion protein gene and the UAS-USP7-promoter-USP7 sequence individually (these three genes were synthesized and connected to their vectors by Genscript). Find more details about the design of the fusion protein and the plasmid vector in Parts section.

To test the feasibility of transfecting multiple plasmids into Treg cells, we acquired the Flag-FOXP3-Jurkat cell line from Shanghai Institute of Immunology, Medical College, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. As a stable transfection strain with high expression of Flag-FOXP3 obtained by transfecting Flag-FOXP3 fusion protein into Jurkat T cells, it is a decent model to simulate the Treg status in human body. In our experiment, we introduced our three-plasmid expressing system into the Flag-FOXP3-Jurkat cells by lentiviral transfection and electroporation respectively. The expression of both SynNotch and CAR system in Flag-FOXP3-Jurkat cells were confirmed by western blot and quantitative real-time PCR (Figure 1).

Figure1. The expression of SynNotch and CAR system in Flag-FOXP3-Jurkat cell line introduced by lentiviral transfection and electroporation

The functioning validation of SynNotch and CAR system

To test SynNotch’s stabilization function on FOXP3 in Treg cells under inflammatory conditions, inflammatory factor IL-6 was added into the culture medium to simulate the microenvironment in RA patients, then western blot and quantitative real-time PCR were performed. Without IL-17A, the expression of FOXP3 was significantly reduced compared to normal one due to the inactivation of SynNotch. However, with the addition of IL-17A, the FOXP3 level was greatly uplifted (Figure 2), indicating that the SynNotch system stabilized FOXP3 in Treg cells with the presence of IL-6.

To explore the effect of IL-17A concentration on the function of SynNotch with the presence of IL-6, various concentrations of IL-17A were given and the expression of USP7 and FOXP3 was tested. With a higher concentration of IL-17A, a higher expression of USP7 and FOXP3 was detected, indicating that the concentration of IL-17A played an important role in the expression level of SynNotch.

Figure2. The SynNotch system stabilizing FOXP3 in Treg under inflammatory conditions


1.Roybal KT, Williams JZ, et al. Engineering T Cells with Customized Therapeutic Response Programs Using Synthetic Notch Receptors. Cell 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.011.

2.Klebanoff CA, Restifo NP. Customizing Functionality and Payload Delivery for Receptor-Engineered T Cells. Cell 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.033.

3.Ellebrecht CT, Bhoj VG, et al. Reengineering chimeric antigen receptor T cells for targeted therapy of autoimmune disease. Science 2016. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6756.

4.Fransson M, Piras E, et al. CAR/FoxP3-engineered T regulatory cells target the CNS and suppress EAE upon intranasal delivery. J Neuroinflammation. 2012. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-112.

5.MacDonald KG, Hoeppli RE, et al. Alloantigen-specific regulatory T cells generated with a chimeric antigen receptor. J Clin Invest. 2016. doi: 10.1172/JCI82771. Epub 2016 Mar 21.

6.Roybal KT, Rupp LJ. et al. Precision Tumor Recognition by T Cells With Combinatorial Antigen-Sensing Circuits. Cell. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.011.

7.Kononenko AV, Lee NC. et al. Generation of a conditionally self-eliminating HAC gene delivery vector through incorporation of a tTAVP64 expression cassette. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv124.

8.Müller K, Zurbriggen MD, Weber W. An optogenetic upgrade for the Tet-OFF system. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015. doi: 10.1002/bit.25562.

9.Khalil DN, Smith EL, et al. The future of cancer treatment: immunomodulation, CARs and combination immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 May. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.25.

10.Chen Z, Barbi J, et al. The ubiquitin ligase Stub1 negatively modulates regulatory T cell suppressive activity by promoting degradation of the transcription factor Foxp3. Immunity. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.006.

11.Van Loosdregt J, Fleskens V, et al. Stabilization of the transcription factor Foxp3 by the deubiquitinase USP7 increases Treg-cell-suppressive capacity. Immunity. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.018.

12.Wang L, Kumar S, et al. Ubiquitin-specific Protease-7 Inhibition Impairs Tip60-dependent Foxp3+ T-regulatory Cell Function and Promotes Antitumor Immunity. EBioMedicine. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.10.018.

13.Chen X, Oppenheim JJ. Th17 cells and Tregs: unlikely allies. J Leukoc Biol. 2014 May;95(5):723-731. Epub 2014 Feb 21

14. Ren J, Li B. The Functional Stability of FOXP3 and RORγt in Treg and Th17 and Their Therapeutic Applications. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol.2017;107:155-189. doi: 10.1016/ bs.apcsb.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

15. Chen X, Oppenheim JJ. Th17 cells and Tregs: unlikely allies. J Leukoc Biol. 2014 May;95(5):723-731. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

16.Brudno JN, Kochenderfer JN. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies for lymphoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 31. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.128.

17.Miossec P, Kolls JK. Targeting IL-17 and TH17 cells in chronic inflammation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012 Oct;11(10):763-76. doi: 10.1038/nrd3794.

18.Mills KH. TLR-dependent T cell activation in autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011 Nov 18;11(12):807-22. doi: 10.1038/nri3095.

19.Burzyn D, Benoist C, Mathis D. Regulatory T cells in nonlymphoid tissues. Nat Immunol. 2013 Oct;14(10):1007-13. doi: 10.1038/ni.2683. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

20.Sakaguchi S, Yamaguchi T, Nomura T, Ono M. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell. 2008 May 30;133(5):775-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.009.