(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<h3 class="ar-title"><span class="dg"> </span>The functioning validation of SynNotch and CAR system</h3> | <h3 class="ar-title"><span class="dg"> </span>The functioning validation of SynNotch and CAR system</h3> | ||
− | <h4><br>To test SynNotch’s stabilization function on FOXP3 in Treg cells under inflammatory conditions, inflammatory factor IL-6 was added into the culture medium to simulate the microenvironment in RA patients, then western blot and quantitative real-time PCR were performed. Without IL-17A, the expression of FOXP3 was significantly reduced compared to normal one due to the inactivation of SynNotch. However, with the addition of IL-17A, the FOXP3 level was greatly uplifted (Figure | + | <h4><br>To test SynNotch’s stabilization function on FOXP3 in Treg cells under inflammatory conditions, inflammatory factor IL-6 was added into the culture medium to simulate the microenvironment in RA patients, then western blot and quantitative real-time PCR were performed. Without IL-17A, the expression of FOXP3 was significantly reduced compared to normal one due to the inactivation of SynNotch. However, with the addition of IL-17A, the FOXP3 level was greatly uplifted (Figure 2), indicating that the SynNotch system stabilized FOXP3 in Treg cells with the presence of IL-6. </h4> |
<br> | <br> | ||
<h4><br>To explore the effect of IL-17A concentration on the function of SynNotch with the presence of IL-6, various concentrations of IL-17A were given and the expression of USP7 and FOXP3 was tested. With a higher concentration of IL-17A, a higher expression of USP7 and FOXP3 was detected, indicating that the concentration of IL-17A played an important role in the expression level of SynNotch.</h4> | <h4><br>To explore the effect of IL-17A concentration on the function of SynNotch with the presence of IL-6, various concentrations of IL-17A were given and the expression of USP7 and FOXP3 was tested. With a higher concentration of IL-17A, a higher expression of USP7 and FOXP3 was detected, indicating that the concentration of IL-17A played an important role in the expression level of SynNotch.</h4> | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
<h3 class="ar-title">Reference:</h3> | <h3 class="ar-title">Reference:</h3> | ||
− | + | <h4>1.Roybal KT, Williams JZ, et al. Engineering T Cells with Customized Therapeutic Response Programs Using Synthetic Notch Receptors. Cell 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.011.</h4><h4> | |
− | + | 2.Klebanoff CA, Restifo NP. Customizing Functionality and Payload Delivery for Receptor-Engineered T Cells. Cell 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.033.</h4><h4> | |
− | + | 3.Ellebrecht CT, Bhoj VG, et al. Reengineering chimeric antigen receptor T cells for targeted therapy of autoimmune disease. Science 2016. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6756.</h4><h4> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | 4.Fransson M, Piras E, et al. CAR/FoxP3-engineered T regulatory cells target the CNS and suppress EAE upon intranasal delivery. J Neuroinflammation. 2012. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-112.</h4><h4> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | 5.MacDonald KG, Hoeppli RE, et al. Alloantigen-specific regulatory T cells generated with a chimeric antigen receptor. J Clin Invest. 2016. doi: 10.1172/JCI82771. Epub 2016 Mar 21.</h4><h4> | |
− | + | 6.Roybal KT, Rupp LJ. et al. Precision Tumor Recognition by T Cells With Combinatorial Antigen-Sensing Circuits. Cell. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.011.</h4><h4> | |
− | + | 7.Kononenko AV, Lee NC. et al. Generation of a conditionally self-eliminating HAC gene delivery vector through incorporation of a tTAVP64 expression cassette. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv124.</h4><h4> | |
− | + | 8.Müller K, Zurbriggen MD, Weber W. An optogenetic upgrade for the Tet-OFF system. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015. doi: 10.1002/bit.25562. </h4><h4> | |
− | + | 9.Khalil DN, Smith EL, et al. The future of cancer treatment: immunomodulation, CARs and combination immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 May. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.25. </h4><h4> | |
− | + | 10.Chen Z, Barbi J, et al. The ubiquitin ligase Stub1 negatively modulates regulatory T cell suppressive activity by promoting degradation of the transcription factor Foxp3. Immunity. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.006.</h4><h4> | |
− | + | 11.Van Loosdregt J, Fleskens V, et al. Stabilization of the transcription factor Foxp3 by the deubiquitinase USP7 increases Treg-cell-suppressive capacity. Immunity. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.018.</h4><h4> | |
− | + | 12.Wang L, Kumar S, et al. Ubiquitin-specific Protease-7 Inhibition Impairs Tip60-dependent Foxp3+ T-regulatory Cell Function and Promotes Antitumor Immunity. EBioMedicine. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.10.018.</h4><h4> | |
− | + | 13.Chen X, Oppenheim JJ. Th17 cells and Tregs: unlikely allies. J Leukoc Biol. 2014 May;95(5):723-731. Epub 2014 Feb 21</h4><h4> | |
+ | 14. Ren J, Li B. The Functional Stability of FOXP3 and RORγt in Treg and Th17 and Their Therapeutic Applications. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol.2017;107:155-189. doi: 10.1016/ bs.apcsb.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Dec 15.</h4><h4> | ||
+ | 15. Chen X, Oppenheim JJ. Th17 cells and Tregs: unlikely allies. J Leukoc Biol. 2014 May;95(5):723-731. Epub 2014 Feb 21.</h4><h4> | ||
+ | 16.Brudno JN, Kochenderfer JN. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies for lymphoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 31. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.128.</h4><h4> | ||
+ | 17.Miossec P, Kolls JK. Targeting IL-17 and TH17 cells in chronic inflammation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012 Oct;11(10):763-76. doi: 10.1038/nrd3794.</h4><h4> | ||
+ | 18.Mills KH. TLR-dependent T cell activation in autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011 Nov 18;11(12):807-22. doi: 10.1038/nri3095.</h4><h4> | ||
+ | 19.Burzyn D, Benoist C, Mathis D. Regulatory T cells in nonlymphoid tissues. Nat Immunol. 2013 Oct;14(10):1007-13. doi: 10.1038/ni.2683. Epub 2013 Sep 18.</h4><h4> | ||
+ | 20.Sakaguchi S, Yamaguchi T, Nomura T, Ono M. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell. 2008 May 30;133(5):775-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.009.</h4> | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:38, 1 November 2017