|
|
| Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| | <br> | | <br> |
| | </div> | | </div> |
| − | <div class="section container">
| |
| − | <h2 class="section-sub">Temperature Sensing</h2>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="col section-text container">
| |
| − | <p>To test if the <i>ibpa</i> promoter actually promotes GFP expression dependent on cultivation temperature, we observed bacterial cultures harboring the expression vector at different temperatures over time.
| |
| − | Diagram A in figure 1 shows the fluorescence intensities we measured all 15 minutes over 6 hours. Cultivation at 28°C lead to a very slow but steady increase in fluorescence intensity, whereas cultivation at 37°C resulted in a fast and steady increase in fluorescence intensity.
| |
| − | For comparison of the different samples, we also divided the value for each sample’s fluorescence intensity by its respective OD<sub>600</sub>(= relative fluorescence) to take the cell growth into account. The results are shown in diagram B in figure 1. When cultivated at 28°C, the relative fluorescence of the bacterial culture decreased throughout the whole experiment, down to a base level of fluorescence (blue line). When cultivated at 37°C, we measured a small decrease for the first hour and afterwards a strong increase of relative fluorescence with time (yellow line). When the temperature was changed to 37°C after three hours of incubation at 28°C, the relative fluorescence started to rise significantly within less than an hour (orange line). When lowered to 28°C from 37°C the intensity of relative fluorescence decreased (grey line).</p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col section-image border border-secondary">
| |
| − | <img src="" alt="[temp diagram uno]">
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col section-image border border-secondary">
| |
| − | <img src="" alt="[temp diagram duo]">
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col image-subtext border border-secondary">
| |
| − | <font size="-2"><b>Figure 1: Change of fluorescence intensity during cultivation in four bacterial cultures.</b> Cultures 1 and 2 were incubated
| |
| − | at 28°C and cultures 3 and 4 at 37°C. After 3 hours (red line) the incubation temperature of culture 2 was
| |
| − | increased to 37° and the temperature of culture 3 is decreased to 28°C. The excitation wavelength was 485/20
| |
| − | nm and the measured emission wavelength was 531/20 nm. A) The measured fluorescence intensity is depicted.
| |
| − | B) Relative fluorescence, each measured fluorescence intensity was divided by the measured OD<sub>600</sub> of the sample.</font>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col section-text container">
| |
| − | <p>The change in relative fluorescence with change of temperature indicates that the construct is responding to induction by increase in temperature. When incubated at 37°C, there was a strong increase in overall and relative fluorescence. This result confirms the induction of the <i>ibpa</i> promoter by heat.
| |
| − | However, it was also shown that it took some time for the bacteria to adapt to the altered temperature, until a change in fluorescence could be observed. If the culture had already been incubated in the cultivation flask for 3 h at 28°C, a subsequent rise in temperature to 37°C led to a strong increase in fluorescence within less than 1 h. It must be noted though, that the cultivation flasks had to be taken out of the incubator for a short time every 15 minutes to take the samples for the measurement of fluorescence, which might have interfered with Gfp production.
| |
| − | Moreover it could be shown that a decrease in temperature from 37°C to 28°C led to lower activity of the <i>ibpa</i> promoter and consequently the production of fluorescence protein decreased. The reduction of Gfp expression happened shortly after the temperature was reduced, within about 15 min. Although the Gfp production clearly dropped, when the cultures were incubated at 28°C, there was still a small level of expression. In relation to the cell density measured by OD<sub>600</sub>, the fluorescence significantly decreased. However, the 3 h cultivation time at 28°C was not enough to reduce either fluorescence intensity or relative fluorescence to the level of the culture cultivated at 28°C over the whole experiment.</p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>It has to be noted that the <i>ibpA</i> promoter is already active at a temperature of 37°C. This corresponds to the temperature optimum of <i>E. coli</i> and may come unexpected for a heat shock promoter. However, when the bacterial culture is grown at a lower temperature like 28°C, the increase to 37°C can be used as a heat shock for induction. To further shorten the time span needed for induction of the ibpa promoter, it would be beneficial to test the expression construct at even higher temperatures. In this case, it would be important to keep an eye on cell growth as <i>E. coli</i> does not tolerate growing under extreme heat shock conditions for an unlimited amount of time. Additionally, it might be possible to further improve the promoter in the future via site-directed mutagenesis.</p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col section-image border border-secondary">
| |
| − | <img src="" alt="[inactive (28°C)]">
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col section-image border border-secondary">
| |
| − | <img src="" alt="[active (37°C)]">
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col image-subtext border border-secondary">
| |
| − | <font size="-2"><b>Figure 2: blablabla.</b> blabla.</font>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
