Difference between revisions of "Team:Groningen/Overview"
Fmeier1994 (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<h5>Human Practises</h5> | <h5>Human Practises</h5> | ||
| − | <p>Our final product is geared towards the dairy industry, towards making a product that would essentially help to increase the yield and efficiency of for example cheese. In order to create a relevant product which would actually be useful in the current industry, we discussed with some of the biggest stakeholders in the dairy industries, mainly within the Netherlands. We also | + | <p>Our final product is geared towards the dairy industry, towards making a product that would essentially help to increase the yield and efficiency of for example cheese production. In order to create a relevant product which would actually be useful in the current industry, we discussed with some of the biggest stakeholders in the dairy industries, mainly within the Netherlands. We also received critical feedback from ethics experts, government organizations and communication experts. |
| + | Throughout this process with the stakeholders and experts, we did not only debate relevance of our product for the dairy industry, we also tried to assess and improve the safety of our product. For further details on these discussion please refer to our our <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Groningen/HP/Silver">Human Practices Silver page.</a></p> | ||
| − | <p>Based on | + | <p>Based on the continued feedback, we tried to enhance our product model and tweak parts in order to ensure that the final product is safe, does not contaminate food products with GMOs and lives up to our and stakeholder expectations. Evaluations from industry stakeholders helped shape our vision for the best possible implementation. To see the exact details of each interaction, and how it influenced our product please see our <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Groningen/HP/Gold_Integrated">Integrated Human Practices page.</a></p> |
| − | <p>In addition to | + | <p>In addition to trying to adjust our design we also tried to inform the general public about our project as well as trying to make the sometimes confusing world of synthetic biology more accessible. For this, we were present during multiple public events and educated many different groups in society. In collaboration with the RIVM (Dutch Government Institute for Health and Environment), we designed a game ‘Thinking Before Doing’ regarding synthetic biology. For further details refer to <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Groningen/Engagement">Public Engagement page.</a></p> |
| − | <p>Originally, our Human practices began as a way to fulfill the iGEM requirement of considering the implications of our product beyond the lab. Somewhere along the line, we | + | <p>Originally, our Human practices began as a way to fulfill the iGEM requirement of considering the implications of our product beyond the lab. Somewhere along the line, we take pleasure in doing it, looking forward to the conversations, engagements, and going beyond the bare minimum to actually form connections and maximize the potential of our product for industry, public and other stakeholders. We hope you will fancy the journey as much as we did.</p> |
</div> <!-- main-col --> | </div> <!-- main-col --> | ||
Revision as of 12:35, 16 October 2017
Overview
Human Practises
Our final product is geared towards the dairy industry, towards making a product that would essentially help to increase the yield and efficiency of for example cheese production. In order to create a relevant product which would actually be useful in the current industry, we discussed with some of the biggest stakeholders in the dairy industries, mainly within the Netherlands. We also received critical feedback from ethics experts, government organizations and communication experts. Throughout this process with the stakeholders and experts, we did not only debate relevance of our product for the dairy industry, we also tried to assess and improve the safety of our product. For further details on these discussion please refer to our our Human Practices Silver page.
Based on the continued feedback, we tried to enhance our product model and tweak parts in order to ensure that the final product is safe, does not contaminate food products with GMOs and lives up to our and stakeholder expectations. Evaluations from industry stakeholders helped shape our vision for the best possible implementation. To see the exact details of each interaction, and how it influenced our product please see our Integrated Human Practices page.
In addition to trying to adjust our design we also tried to inform the general public about our project as well as trying to make the sometimes confusing world of synthetic biology more accessible. For this, we were present during multiple public events and educated many different groups in society. In collaboration with the RIVM (Dutch Government Institute for Health and Environment), we designed a game ‘Thinking Before Doing’ regarding synthetic biology. For further details refer to Public Engagement page.
Originally, our Human practices began as a way to fulfill the iGEM requirement of considering the implications of our product beyond the lab. Somewhere along the line, we take pleasure in doing it, looking forward to the conversations, engagements, and going beyond the bare minimum to actually form connections and maximize the potential of our product for industry, public and other stakeholders. We hope you will fancy the journey as much as we did.
