Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
<div class="section-text container"> | <div class="section-text container"> | ||
For this study we needed to transform 8 devices into the presupposed bacteria strain | For this study we needed to transform 8 devices into the presupposed bacteria strain | ||
− | <i>E.coli</i> DH5α</>. This included a positive control | + | <i>E.coli</i> DH5α |
+ | </>. This included a positive control | ||
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I20270">I20270</a>, the constitutive tetR repressible promoter as negativ control | <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I20270">I20270</a>, the constitutive tetR repressible promoter as negativ control | ||
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_R0040">R0040</a>, Test Device 1 | <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_R0040">R0040</a>, Test Device 1 | ||
Line 45: | Line 46: | ||
<h2 class="section-sub">Calibration Protocols</h2> | <h2 class="section-sub">Calibration Protocols</h2> | ||
<div class="section-text container"> | <div class="section-text container"> | ||
− | 1. OD<sub>600</sub> Reference point <br> Results of OD<sub>600</sub> measurement of 1 ml LUDOX and 1 ml H<sub>2</sub>O with dH<sub>2</sub>O as blank. | + | 1. OD |
− | + | <sub>600</sub> Reference point | |
− | + | <br> Results of OD | |
− | + | <sub>600</sub> measurement of 1 ml LUDOX and 1 ml H | |
− | + | <sub>2</sub>O with dH | |
− | + | <sub>2</sub>O as blank. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <img class="section-image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/7/73/Ludox.png/758px-Ludox.png" alt="LUDOX Table"> | |
− | + | <div class="section-sub-text"> | |
− | + | <b>Fig. 1:</b> OD | |
− | + | <sub>600</sub> measurement | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | 2. Protocol fluorescein fluorescence standard curve: | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <img class="section-image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5f/Fltable.png" alt="fluorescein Table"> | ||
+ | <div class="section-sub-text"> | ||
+ | <b>Fig. 2:</b> Fluorescein fluorescence plate reader measurement with gain 48 & 70 in a 96 well plate. The concentration | ||
+ | cuts in half from pure fluorescein in line 1 to 9.766*10 | ||
+ | <sup>-4</sup>> µl fluorescein diluted in PBS in line 11 and PBS only in line 12. All volumes are 100 µl. | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="section-sub-text container"> | <div class="section-sub-text container"> | ||
<p>The task was to find the optimal plate reader settings for the cell measurement on Day 3 through a fluorescein | <p>The task was to find the optimal plate reader settings for the cell measurement on Day 3 through a fluorescein | ||
Line 85: | Line 95: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="section-text container"> | <div class="section-text container"> | ||
− | <p>As values bigger than 100 000 are labeled as OVERFLOW and do not represent a usable number, the excel algorithm could | + | <p>As values bigger than 100 000 are labeled as OVERFLOW and do not represent a usable number, the excel algorithm could |
− | display them in usable curves. | + | not display them in usable curves. |
<p> | <p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 95: | Line 105: | ||
<h2 class="section-sub">Cell Measurement Protocol</h2> | <h2 class="section-sub">Cell Measurement Protocol</h2> | ||
<div class="section-text container"> | <div class="section-text container"> | ||
− | < | + | |
− | + | <p> | |
− | + | <span class="badge badge-secondary">Day 1</span> OD600 Measurement</p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <p> | |
− | + | <span class="badge badge-secondary">Day 2</span> Transformation</p> | |
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="section-text container"> | <div class="section-text container"> | ||
Line 108: | Line 119: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="section-text container"> | <div class="section-text container"> | ||
− | + | <span class="badge badge-secondary">Day 3</span> Cell growth, sampling and assay. Preparing and taking probes at T0h, T2h, T4h, T6h accordingly to the | |
− | + | dilution sheet and | |
− | + | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/85/InterLab_2017_Plate_Reader_Protocol.pdf">plate reader protocol</a>. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="section-text container"> | <div class="section-text container"> | ||
− | <img class="section-image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/ | + | <img class="section-image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a8/Fl_table.png" alt="Flourescence table"> |
+ | |||
<div class="section-sub-text"> | <div class="section-sub-text"> | ||
<b>Tab. 3: </b>Raw readings of fluorescence measurement of the day 2 ONC at 0 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours. | <b>Tab. 3: </b>Raw readings of fluorescence measurement of the day 2 ONC at 0 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours. | ||
Line 130: | Line 139: | ||
<command class="colibot" /> project experiments. | <command class="colibot" /> project experiments. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="section- | + | <div class="row"> |
− | <img class="section-image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/ | + | <div class="col"> |
− | <p>Even though device 2 has the strongest fluorescence, device 4 grew better resulting in a higher OD<sub>600</sub>.</p> | + | <img class="section-image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/1f/Raw_fluorescence.png" alt="Flourescence table"> |
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="col"> | ||
+ | <img class="section-image" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/53/Od600.png" alt="OD600 measurement"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="section-sub-text container"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Even though device 2 has the strongest fluorescence, device 4 grew better resulting in a higher OD | ||
+ | <sub>600</sub>.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 140: | Line 159: | ||
<div class="section container"> | <div class="section container"> | ||
<h2 class="section-sub">Measurement Procedure Details</h2> | <h2 class="section-sub">Measurement Procedure Details</h2> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="section-text container"> | <div class="section-text container"> | ||
96 well plate, black, flat, transparent bottom Read: Fluorescence Endpoint Excitation: 485 Emission: 531 Band width: 20.0 | 96 well plate, black, flat, transparent bottom Read: Fluorescence Endpoint Excitation: 485 Emission: 531 Band width: 20.0 | ||
− | Optics: Top, Gain: 70 Read speed: Normal, Delay: 100 ms, Measurements/Data Point: 10 Read Height: 8 mm <br> Temperature: | + | Optics: Top, Gain: 70 Read speed: Normal, Delay: 100 ms, Measurements/Data Point: 10 Read Height: 8 mm |
− | + | <br> Temperature: 28,8 °C (no preset) | |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 166: | Line 186: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
</html> | </html> | ||
{{NAWI_Graz:footer}} | {{NAWI_Graz:footer}} |
Revision as of 23:46, 1 November 2017
INTERLAB MEASUREMENT STUDY
Reliable and repeatable measurement is key to compare and analyse data from different labs all over the world. To support the effort to create detailed protocols to measure fluorescence and improve the possibility of comparing data, the iGEM Team NAWI_Graz 2017 decided to participate in the Fourth International InterLaboratory Measurement Study in synthetic biology. The goal is to establish a GFP measurement protocol based on engineering principles.
Our tasks were to follow exactly the iGEM Plate Reader Protocol , fill in the prepared excel sheets and send the results to the iGEM headquarter.Results
Calibration Protocols
Results of OD 600 measurement of 1 ml LUDOX and 1 ml H 2O with dH 2O as blank.
The task was to find the optimal plate reader settings for the cell measurement on Day 3 through a fluorescein dilution in PBS and a 485 excitation & 531 emission fluorescence measurement. We came up with the problem, that the same gain settings could not be used for both, fluorescein and cell measurement as in each case one of the measurement only displayed 50% usable outcomes. Additionally, only a gain of 48 or less displayed a complete set of fluorescein values. But the producing company of our plate reader only recommends a gain range for 50-150. So not even gain 48 displays “usable" values. We found the possibility for wider detection ranges in the product help documents, but our plate reader model Synergy MX from BioTek did not offer this option. Problems with the dilution by pipetting could be excluded.
As values bigger than 100 000 are labeled as OVERFLOW and do not represent a usable number, the excel algorithm could not display them in usable curves.
Cell Measurement Protocol
Day 1 OD600 Measurement
Day 2 Transformation
The standard dilution sheet only calculates volumes for a target of 10 ml. The official InterLab protocol wants a target volume of 12 ml but also the use of the dilution calculation sheet, so we made a decision and sticked clearly to the protocol and did not decide to change the sheet algorithm.
Even though device 2 has the strongest fluorescence, device 4 grew better resulting in a higher OD 600.
Measurement Procedure Details
Temperature: 28,8 °C (no preset)