Difference between revisions of "Team:Tongji China/Results"
| Line 213: | Line 213: | ||
<a name="top"></a> | <a name="top"></a> | ||
<!-- Title and Subtitle --> | <!-- Title and Subtitle --> | ||
| + | <div class="mdl-typography--text-center mobileview-title" style="height:800px; background:url('https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c2/2017tongji_wiki_image_background.png') center no-repeat; background-size:cover;"> | ||
<div class="mdl-typography--text-center" style="margin-bottom:20%"> | <div class="mdl-typography--text-center" style="margin-bottom:20%"> | ||
<div class="logo-font android-slogan" style="color:#388E3C;">Results</div> | <div class="logo-font android-slogan" style="color:#388E3C;">Results</div> | ||
| Line 220: | Line 221: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
<!-- Plasmid Construction --> | <!-- Plasmid Construction --> | ||
| Line 361: | Line 363: | ||
<div class="android-wear-band"> | <div class="android-wear-band"> | ||
<div class="android-wear-band-text"> | <div class="android-wear-band-text"> | ||
| − | <div class="mdl-typography--display-2 mdl-typography--font-thin"> | + | <div class="mdl-typography--display-2 mdl-typography--font-thin">Ignis Fly</div> |
<p class="mdl-typography--headline mdl-typography--font-thin" style="margin-bottom:0px"> | <p class="mdl-typography--headline mdl-typography--font-thin" style="margin-bottom:0px"> | ||
| − | + | 2017 Tongji_China iGEM Team | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
Revision as of 04:03, 1 November 2017
Tongji iGEM
TongJi iGEM
Results
The outcomes of our experiments.
expand_more
expand_more
Plasmid Construction
We constructed three plasmid successfully: pUAST-pleP-Gal4, pUAST-pleP-Gal80ts and pUAST-UAS-TH.
This is our digest verification map:
This is our digest verification map:
pUAST-pleP-Gal4
pUAST-pleP-Gal80ts
pUAST-UAS-TH
Behavior Tests
Experiment 1: Use real-time PCR to determine whether the expression of TH is higher at 29°C
Figure 1 - The relative expression of TH in modified fruit flies increased significantly.
Experiment 2: Detect male-male courtship when raising the temperature
Mating index (the relative time that the fruit fly use for mating):
Figure 2 - The mating index of the treated group rises significantly in at 29°C.
[time=5minutes, n=5, P<0.01]
Experiment 3: Test the modified Drosophila’ gender preferences
Comparison of time that the fruit flies use for mating male or female flies:
Figure 3 - The modified fruit flies had no preference for males and females when mating.
[time=10minutes, n=8, P>0.5]
Experiment 4: Test whether the modified fruit flies increase their appeal for males
The time that the fruit fly use for mating in five minutes:
There was no courtship in all groups.
Experiment 5: Does the co-culture of wild-type and modified fruit flies influence their courtship with wild-type females?
Comparison of time that the fruit flies use for mating male or female flies:
Figure 4 - The co-culture of wild-type and modified fruit flies did not affect the courtship of wild-type flies.
[time=5minutes, n=5, P>0.5]
Experiment 6: Is the viability of modified fruit flies affected?
The number of live flies in the absence of food and water:
Figure 5 - The survival curve of fruit flies in the absence of food and water
The number of live flies in high temperatures (37°C):
Figure 6 - The survival curve of fruit flies under high temperature
[T=37°C]
The seismo-tube experiment:
Figure 7 - The modified fruit flies crawl higher in the seismo-tube experiment
Experiment 7: The reproductive curve of the modified fruit fly.
Figure 8 - The reproduction curve of the modified fruit fly
[n=5]
Experiment 8: Does the proportion of modified flies have an impact on mating rates of population?
Figure 9 - The impact that proportion of modified flies have on mating rates of population
[n=5]
Figure 1 - The relative expression of TH in modified fruit flies increased significantly.
Experiment 2: Detect male-male courtship when raising the temperature
Mating index (the relative time that the fruit fly use for mating):
Figure 2 - The mating index of the treated group rises significantly in at 29°C.[time=5minutes, n=5, P<0.01]
Experiment 3: Test the modified Drosophila’ gender preferences
Comparison of time that the fruit flies use for mating male or female flies:
Figure 3 - The modified fruit flies had no preference for males and females when mating.[time=10minutes, n=8, P>0.5]
Experiment 4: Test whether the modified fruit flies increase their appeal for males
The time that the fruit fly use for mating in five minutes:
There was no courtship in all groups.
[time=5minutes, n=5]
Experiment 5: Does the co-culture of wild-type and modified fruit flies influence their courtship with wild-type females?
Comparison of time that the fruit flies use for mating male or female flies:
Figure 4 - The co-culture of wild-type and modified fruit flies did not affect the courtship of wild-type flies.[time=5minutes, n=5, P>0.5]
Experiment 6: Is the viability of modified fruit flies affected?
The number of live flies in the absence of food and water:
Figure 5 - The survival curve of fruit flies in the absence of food and water
Figure 6 - The survival curve of fruit flies under high temperature[T=37°C]
Figure 7 - The modified fruit flies crawl higher in the seismo-tube experiment
Experiment 7: The reproductive curve of the modified fruit fly.
Figure 8 - The reproduction curve of the modified fruit fly[n=5]
Experiment 8: Does the proportion of modified flies have an impact on mating rates of population?
Figure 9 - The impact that proportion of modified flies have on mating rates of population[n=5]
